| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Semiárido. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/07/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/07/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MELO, D. C. D.; ANACHE, J. A. A.; BORGES, V. P.; MIRALLES, D. G.; MARTENS, B.; FISHER, J. B.; NÓBREGA, R. L. B.; MORENO, A.; CABRAL, O. M. R.; RODRIGUES, T. R.; BEZERRA, B.; SILVA, C. M. S.; MEIRA NETO, A. A.; MOURA, M. S. B. de; MARQUES, T. V.; CAMPOS, S.; NOGUEIRA, J. S.; ROSOLEM, R.; SOUZA, R. M. S.; ANTONINO, A. C. D.; HOLL, D.; GALLEGUILLOS, M.; PEREZ-QUEZADA, J. F.; VERHOEF, A.; KUTZBACH, L.; LIMA, J. R. S.; SOUZA, E. S.; GASSMAN, M. I.; PEREZ, C. F.; TONTI, N.; POSSE, G.; RAINS, D.; OLIVEIRA, P. T. S.; WENDLAND, E. |
|
Afiliação: |
D. C. D. MELO, UFPB; J. A. A. ANACHE, UFMS; V. P. BORGES, UFPB; D. G. MIRALLES, Hydro-Climate Extremes Lab (H-CEL), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; B. MARTENS, Hydro-Climate Extremes Lab (H-CEL), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; J. B. FISHER, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA; R. L. B. NÓBREGA, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London; A. MORENO, Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana, Missoula, MT; OSVALDO MACHADO RODRIGUES CABRAL, CNPMA; T. R. RODRIGUES, UFMS; B. BEZERRA, UFRN; C. M. S. SILVA, UFRN; A. A. MEIRA NETO, Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; MAGNA SOELMA BESERRA DE MOURA, CPATSA; T. V. MARQUES, UFRN; S. CAMPOS, UFRN; J. S. NOGUEIRA, UFMT; R. ROSOLEM, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; R. M. S. SOUZA, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; A. C. D. ANTONINO, UFPE; D. HOLL, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; M. GALLEGUILLOS, Department of Environmental Science and Renewable Natural Resources, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; J. F. PEREZ-QUEZADA, Department of Environmental Science and Renewable Natural Resources, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; A. VERHOEF, Department of Geography and Environmental Science, The University of Reading, Reading, UK; L. KUTZBACH, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; J. R. S. LIMA, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, PE; E. S. SOUZA, UFRPE, Garanhuns, PE; M. I. GASSMAN, Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences, FCEN — UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina; C. F. PEREZ, Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences, FCEN ? UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina; N. TONTI, Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences, FCEN — UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina; G. POSSE, INTA; D. RAINS, Hydro-Climate Extremes Lab (H-CEL), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; P. T. S. OLIVEIRA, UFMS; E. WENDLAND, Department of Hydraulics and Sanitary Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP. |
|
Título: |
Are remote sensing evapotranspiration models reliable across South American ecoregions? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Water Resources Research, v. 57, n. 11, e2020WR028752, 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028752 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Many remote sensing-based evapotranspiration (RSBET) algorithms have been proposed in the past decades and evaluated using flux tower data, mainly over North America and Europe. Model evaluation across South America has been done locally or using only a single algorithm at a time. Here, we provide the first evaluation of multiple RSBET models, at a daily scale, across a wide variety of biomes, climate zones, and land uses in South America. We used meteorological data from 25 flux towers to force four RSBET models: Priestley?Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), Penman?Monteith Mu model (PM-MOD), and Penman?Monteith Nagler model (PM-VI). E ET was predicted satisfactorily by all four models, with correlations consistently higher (?20.6ER) for GLEAM and PT-JPL, and PM-MOD and PM-VI presenting overall better responses in terms of percent bias (?? ?1010EPBIAS%). As for PM-VI, this outcome is expected, given that the model requires calibration with local data. Model skill seems to be unrelated to land-use but instead presented some dependency on biome and climate, with the models producing the best results for wet to moderately wet environments. Our findings show the suitability of individual models for a number of combinations of land cover types, biomes, and climates. At the same time, no model outperformed the others for all conditions, which emphasizes the need for adapting individual algorithms to take into account intrinsic characteristics of climates and ecosystems in South America. MenosMany remote sensing-based evapotranspiration (RSBET) algorithms have been proposed in the past decades and evaluated using flux tower data, mainly over North America and Europe. Model evaluation across South America has been done locally or using only a single algorithm at a time. Here, we provide the first evaluation of multiple RSBET models, at a daily scale, across a wide variety of biomes, climate zones, and land uses in South America. We used meteorological data from 25 flux towers to force four RSBET models: Priestley?Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), Penman?Monteith Mu model (PM-MOD), and Penman?Monteith Nagler model (PM-VI). E ET was predicted satisfactorily by all four models, with correlations consistently higher (?20.6ER) for GLEAM and PT-JPL, and PM-MOD and PM-VI presenting overall better responses in terms of percent bias (?? ?1010EPBIAS%). As for PM-VI, this outcome is expected, given that the model requires calibration with local data. Model skill seems to be unrelated to land-use but instead presented some dependency on biome and climate, with the models producing the best results for wet to moderately wet environments. Our findings show the suitability of individual models for a number of combinations of land cover types, biomes, and climates. At the same time, no model outperformed the others for all conditions, which emphasizes the need for adapting individual algorithms to take into account int... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
MODIS; Penman-Monteith; Priestley-Taylor. |
|
Thesagro: |
Evapotranspiração; Sensoriamento Remoto; Vegetação. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Remote sensing. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03247naa a2200613 a 4500
001 2144450
005 2022-07-04
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028752$2DOI
100 1 $aMELO, D. C. D.
245 $aAre remote sensing evapotranspiration models reliable across South American ecoregions?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aMany remote sensing-based evapotranspiration (RSBET) algorithms have been proposed in the past decades and evaluated using flux tower data, mainly over North America and Europe. Model evaluation across South America has been done locally or using only a single algorithm at a time. Here, we provide the first evaluation of multiple RSBET models, at a daily scale, across a wide variety of biomes, climate zones, and land uses in South America. We used meteorological data from 25 flux towers to force four RSBET models: Priestley?Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), Penman?Monteith Mu model (PM-MOD), and Penman?Monteith Nagler model (PM-VI). E ET was predicted satisfactorily by all four models, with correlations consistently higher (?20.6ER) for GLEAM and PT-JPL, and PM-MOD and PM-VI presenting overall better responses in terms of percent bias (?? ?1010EPBIAS%). As for PM-VI, this outcome is expected, given that the model requires calibration with local data. Model skill seems to be unrelated to land-use but instead presented some dependency on biome and climate, with the models producing the best results for wet to moderately wet environments. Our findings show the suitability of individual models for a number of combinations of land cover types, biomes, and climates. At the same time, no model outperformed the others for all conditions, which emphasizes the need for adapting individual algorithms to take into account intrinsic characteristics of climates and ecosystems in South America.
650 $aRemote sensing
650 $aEvapotranspiração
650 $aSensoriamento Remoto
650 $aVegetação
653 $aMODIS
653 $aPenman-Monteith
653 $aPriestley-Taylor
700 1 $aANACHE, J. A. A.
700 1 $aBORGES, V. P.
700 1 $aMIRALLES, D. G.
700 1 $aMARTENS, B.
700 1 $aFISHER, J. B.
700 1 $aNÓBREGA, R. L. B.
700 1 $aMORENO, A.
700 1 $aCABRAL, O. M. R.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, T. R.
700 1 $aBEZERRA, B.
700 1 $aSILVA, C. M. S.
700 1 $aMEIRA NETO, A. A.
700 1 $aMOURA, M. S. B. de
700 1 $aMARQUES, T. V.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, S.
700 1 $aNOGUEIRA, J. S.
700 1 $aROSOLEM, R.
700 1 $aSOUZA, R. M. S.
700 1 $aANTONINO, A. C. D.
700 1 $aHOLL, D.
700 1 $aGALLEGUILLOS, M.
700 1 $aPEREZ-QUEZADA, J. F.
700 1 $aVERHOEF, A.
700 1 $aKUTZBACH, L.
700 1 $aLIMA, J. R. S.
700 1 $aSOUZA, E. S.
700 1 $aGASSMAN, M. I.
700 1 $aPEREZ, C. F.
700 1 $aTONTI, N.
700 1 $aPOSSE, G.
700 1 $aRAINS, D.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, P. T. S.
700 1 $aWENDLAND, E.
773 $tWater Resources Research$gv. 57, n. 11, e2020WR028752, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/02/2012 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/05/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PARANHOS, B. A. J.; MCINNIS, D.; MORELLI, R.; CASTRO, R. M.; GARZIERA, L.; PARANHOS, L. G.; COSTA, K.; GAVA, C. A. T.; COSTA, M. L. Z.; WALDER, J. M. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
BEATRIZ AGUIAR JORDAO PARANHOS, CPATSA; USDA-ARS Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Honolulu, HI, USA; Department of Entomology and Acarology – USP/ESALQ, Piracicaba-SP, Brazil; Laboratory of Food Irradiation and Radio-Entomology, CENA – University of São Paulo, Piracicaba-SP, Brazil; CARLOS ALBERTO TUAO GAVA, CPATSA; Laboratory of Food Irradiation and Radio-Entomology, CENA – University of São Paulo, Piracicaba-SP, Brazil; Laboratory of Food Irradiation and Radio-Entomology, CENA – University of São Paulo, Piracicaba-SP, Brazil. |
|
Título: |
Optimum dose of ginger root oil to treat sterile Mediterranean fruit fly males (Diptera: Tephritidae) |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Applied Entomology, Hamburg, v. 137, p. 83-90, 2013. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Supplement 1. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The sterile insect technique (SIT) is widely used as part of an integrated approach to reduce field populations of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata, Diptera: Tephritidae). Aromatherapy based on exposure to ginger root oil (GRO) volatiles is known as a method to significantly improve the sexual performance of sterile medfly males, and is being used in many mass-rearing facilities around the world. However, the optimum dose of GRO is not well defined. This work evaluated in laboratory cages four different doses of GRO and a control (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 ml/m3), and two different methods to hold flies prior to release (paper bags and plastic cages). The objective was to find the lowest dose that provides optimal improvement in mating performance of sterile males when competing with wild males for wild females and optimal reduction in fertility of wild females. Egg hatch, copula duration, the Relative Sterility Index (RSI), and a Competitiveness (C) value (based on RSI) were calculated for each treatment to assess male sexual performance and induction of sterility. The method used to hold flies did not influence the aromatherapy effect. The mean time spent by wild females in copula with wild males was significantly longer than with sterile males for all treatments, except when sterile males were treated with 0.1 ml of GRO/m3. Amongst all doses studied, it is recommended to apply the lowest dose, 0.1 ml of GRO/m3, since at this dose both the RSI and induced sterility reached the highest levels, and were not statistically different from the 0.25 and 0.5 GRO/m3 doses. Indeed, this dose showed a very significant improvement in the mating competitiveness of sterile males aromatically treated with GRO. MenosThe sterile insect technique (SIT) is widely used as part of an integrated approach to reduce field populations of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata, Diptera: Tephritidae). Aromatherapy based on exposure to ginger root oil (GRO) volatiles is known as a method to significantly improve the sexual performance of sterile medfly males, and is being used in many mass-rearing facilities around the world. However, the optimum dose of GRO is not well defined. This work evaluated in laboratory cages four different doses of GRO and a control (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 ml/m3), and two different methods to hold flies prior to release (paper bags and plastic cages). The objective was to find the lowest dose that provides optimal improvement in mating performance of sterile males when competing with wild males for wild females and optimal reduction in fertility of wild females. Egg hatch, copula duration, the Relative Sterility Index (RSI), and a Competitiveness (C) value (based on RSI) were calculated for each treatment to assess male sexual performance and induction of sterility. The method used to hold flies did not influence the aromatherapy effect. The mean time spent by wild females in copula with wild males was significantly longer than with sterile males for all treatments, except when sterile males were treated with 0.1 ml of GRO/m3. Amongst all doses studied, it is recommended to apply the lowest dose, 0.1 ml of GRO/m3, since at this dose both the RSI and induced s... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Aromatherapy; Fruit fly; Inseto estéril; Mosca-das-frutas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Ceratitis Capitata; Entomologia; Inseto. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/93744/1/Beatriz-5.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02663naa a2200325 a 4500
001 1916858
005 2017-05-25
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPARANHOS, B. A. J.
245 $aOptimum dose of ginger root oil to treat sterile Mediterranean fruit fly males (Diptera$bTephritidae)$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
500 $aSupplement 1.
520 $aThe sterile insect technique (SIT) is widely used as part of an integrated approach to reduce field populations of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata, Diptera: Tephritidae). Aromatherapy based on exposure to ginger root oil (GRO) volatiles is known as a method to significantly improve the sexual performance of sterile medfly males, and is being used in many mass-rearing facilities around the world. However, the optimum dose of GRO is not well defined. This work evaluated in laboratory cages four different doses of GRO and a control (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 ml/m3), and two different methods to hold flies prior to release (paper bags and plastic cages). The objective was to find the lowest dose that provides optimal improvement in mating performance of sterile males when competing with wild males for wild females and optimal reduction in fertility of wild females. Egg hatch, copula duration, the Relative Sterility Index (RSI), and a Competitiveness (C) value (based on RSI) were calculated for each treatment to assess male sexual performance and induction of sterility. The method used to hold flies did not influence the aromatherapy effect. The mean time spent by wild females in copula with wild males was significantly longer than with sterile males for all treatments, except when sterile males were treated with 0.1 ml of GRO/m3. Amongst all doses studied, it is recommended to apply the lowest dose, 0.1 ml of GRO/m3, since at this dose both the RSI and induced sterility reached the highest levels, and were not statistically different from the 0.25 and 0.5 GRO/m3 doses. Indeed, this dose showed a very significant improvement in the mating competitiveness of sterile males aromatically treated with GRO.
650 $aCeratitis Capitata
650 $aEntomologia
650 $aInseto
653 $aAromatherapy
653 $aFruit fly
653 $aInseto estéril
653 $aMosca-das-frutas
700 1 $aMCINNIS, D.
700 1 $aMORELLI, R.
700 1 $aCASTRO, R. M.
700 1 $aGARZIERA, L.
700 1 $aPARANHOS, L. G.
700 1 $aCOSTA, K.
700 1 $aGAVA, C. A. T.
700 1 $aCOSTA, M. L. Z.
700 1 $aWALDER, J. M. M.
773 $tJournal of Applied Entomology, Hamburg$gv. 137, p. 83-90, 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
