| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 247 | |
| 164. |  | PALHARES, J. C. P.; PRADO, R. B.; VIGNA, B. B. Z.; SOUSA, S. M. de. Cost-effective natural resources management. In: PALHARES, J. C. P.; OLIVEIRA, V. B. V.; FREIRE JUNIOR, M.; CERDEIRA, A. L.; PRADO, H. A. do (Ed.). Responsible consumption and production: contributions of Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2020. cap. 3, p. 23-29. (Sustainable development goals, 12).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste; Embrapa Solos. |
|    |
| 166. | | CORREA, J. C.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; CURIOLETTI, F.; MULINARI, M. R. Soil fertility in riparian zone of Pinhal watershed, Concórdia, Brasil. In: CENTURY WATERSHED TECHNOLOGY: IMPROVING WATER QULITY AND ENVIRONMENT COFERENCE, 21., 2010, Costa Rica. Proceedings... Costa Rica: Universidad EARTH, 2010. Projeto/Plano de Ação: 01.09.10102-03.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|  |
| 175. | | PALHARES, J. C. P.; MULLER, S.; MATTEI, R. M.; KICH, J. D.; SIGUA, G. C. Microbiological water quality assessment of watershed associated with swine production in Santa Catarina, Brazil. In: INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL MEETINGS, 2007, New Orleans. A century of integrating crops, soils and environment: abstracts. News Orleans: ASA / CSSA / SSSA, 2007. 1 CD-ROM. Projeto n. 03.06.52.000-03.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| 176. | | PALHARES, J. C. P.; PRADO, R. B.; ARAUJO, G. P. de. Realidades ambientais e consumo sustentável. In: PALHARES, J. C. P.; OLIVEIRA, V. B. V.; FREIRE JUNIOR, M.; CERDEIRA, A. L.; PRADO, H. A. do (Ed.). Consumo e produção responsáveis: contribuições da Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. cap. 1. E-book. (Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 12).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 177. | | PALHARES, J. C. P.; BONEZ, G.; MIRANDA, C. R. de; LIMA, J.; KLEIN, J.; MULLER, S. Rede de monitoramento participativo da qualidade da água no Alto Uruguai Catarinense. In: SIMPÓSIO GAÚCHO DE EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL, 4.; FÓRUM ESTADUAL SOBRE CONSERVAÇÃO E USO SUSTENTÁVEL DA ÁGUA, 1.; SEMANA ALTO URUGUAI DO MEIO AMBIENTE, 16., 2007, Erechim. Anais. Erechim: URI, 2007. 1 CD-ROM. Projeto n. 03.06.52.000-03.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 247 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/12/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/12/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
CARRA, S. H. Z.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; DRASTIG, K.; SCHNEIDER, V. E. |
|
Afiliação: |
Sofia Helena Zanella Carra, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bio-economy; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; Katrin Drastig, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bio-economy; Vania Elisabete Schneider, University of Caxias do Sul. |
|
Título: |
The effect of best crop practices in the pig and poultry production on water productivity in a Southern Brazilian Watershed. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Water, v. 12, n. 11, e3014, p. 1-27, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
10.3390/w12113014 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study analyzes the relation between Brazilian broiler and pig production and water productivity using recently developed reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. Dierent rainfed crop arrangements, in dierent scenarios and producer regions in Brazil, were assessed. Water productivity of broiler feed consumption ranged from 0.63 to 1.38 kg perm3 water input to rainfed summer maize (safra) and from 1.20 to 2.21 kg perm3 water input to winter maize (safrinha) while it ranged from 0.28 to 0.95 kg perm3 water input to rainfed soy. For pig feed consumption, rainfed maize ranged from 0.68 to 1.49 kg per m3 water input (safra) and from 1.30 to 2.38 kg perm3 water input (safrinha) while it ranged from 0.30 to 1.03 kg per m3 water input to rainfed soy. A potential amount of water saving of 0.0336 km3 year-1 and 0.0202 km3 year-1 could be attained for producing broiler and pig feed, respectively, depending on the crop rotation and producer region. The results showed that the evapotranspiration of animal feed production represents more than 99% of the total water consumption for broiler and pig production in the study area. The implementation of best crop practices resulted in higher water productivity values of chicken and pork meat and also improved the rainfall water-saving in comparison to conventional agriculture. Hence, the water productivity of the animal production chain in tropical regions demands a close relation to agriculture in order to attain a better understanding and improvement of rainfall water productivity for animal feed production. MenosThis study analyzes the relation between Brazilian broiler and pig production and water productivity using recently developed reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. Dierent rainfed crop arrangements, in dierent scenarios and producer regions in Brazil, were assessed. Water productivity of broiler feed consumption ranged from 0.63 to 1.38 kg perm3 water input to rainfed summer maize (safra) and from 1.20 to 2.21 kg perm3 water input to winter maize (safrinha) while it ranged from 0.28 to 0.95 kg perm3 water input to rainfed soy. For pig feed consumption, rainfed maize ranged from 0.68 to 1.49 kg per m3 water input (safra) and from 1.30 to 2.38 kg perm3 water input (safrinha) while it ranged from 0.30 to 1.03 kg per m3 water input to rainfed soy. A potential amount of water saving of 0.0336 km3 year-1 and 0.0202 km3 year-1 could be attained for producing broiler and pig feed, respectively, depending on the crop rotation and producer region. The results showed that the evapotranspiration of animal feed production represents more than 99% of the total water consumption for broiler and pig production in the study area. The implementation of best crop practices resulted in higher water productivity values of chicken and pork meat and also improved the rainfall water-saving in comparison to conventional agriculture. Hence, the water productivity of the animal production chain in tropical regions demands a close relation to agr... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Blue water; Farm; Green water; Rainfed; Soil evaporation. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Crop rotation. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/219559/1/EffectBestCrop.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02337naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2128576
005 2020-12-22
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3390/w12113014$2DOI
100 1 $aCARRA, S. H. Z.
245 $aThe effect of best crop practices in the pig and poultry production on water productivity in a Southern Brazilian Watershed.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThis study analyzes the relation between Brazilian broiler and pig production and water productivity using recently developed reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. Dierent rainfed crop arrangements, in dierent scenarios and producer regions in Brazil, were assessed. Water productivity of broiler feed consumption ranged from 0.63 to 1.38 kg perm3 water input to rainfed summer maize (safra) and from 1.20 to 2.21 kg perm3 water input to winter maize (safrinha) while it ranged from 0.28 to 0.95 kg perm3 water input to rainfed soy. For pig feed consumption, rainfed maize ranged from 0.68 to 1.49 kg per m3 water input (safra) and from 1.30 to 2.38 kg perm3 water input (safrinha) while it ranged from 0.30 to 1.03 kg per m3 water input to rainfed soy. A potential amount of water saving of 0.0336 km3 year-1 and 0.0202 km3 year-1 could be attained for producing broiler and pig feed, respectively, depending on the crop rotation and producer region. The results showed that the evapotranspiration of animal feed production represents more than 99% of the total water consumption for broiler and pig production in the study area. The implementation of best crop practices resulted in higher water productivity values of chicken and pork meat and also improved the rainfall water-saving in comparison to conventional agriculture. Hence, the water productivity of the animal production chain in tropical regions demands a close relation to agriculture in order to attain a better understanding and improvement of rainfall water productivity for animal feed production.
650 $aCrop rotation
653 $aBlue water
653 $aFarm
653 $aGreen water
653 $aRainfed
653 $aSoil evaporation
700 1 $aPALHARES, J. C. P.
700 1 $aDRASTIG, K.
700 1 $aSCHNEIDER, V. E.
773 $tWater$gv. 12, n. 11, e3014, p. 1-27, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
