| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
| 1. |  | PIRES, C. S. S.; GAZZONI, D. L.; NOCELLI, R. C. F.; MALASPINA, O. Agentes estressores. In: DRUMOND, P. M.; CARVALHO-ZILSE, G. A.; WITTER, S.; ALVES, R. M. de O.; DRUMMOND, M. S. (ed.). Meliponicultura: o produtor pergunta, a Embrapa responde. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2024. Cap. 7. p. 75-84| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Soja. |
|    |
| 3. | | PIRES, C. S. S.; PEREIRA, F. de M.; LOPES, M. T. do R.; NOCELLI, R. C. F.; MALASPINA, Q.; PETTIS, J. S.; TEIXEIRA, E. W. Enfraquecimento e perda de colônias de abelhas no Brasil: há casos de CCD? Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília v. 51, n. 5, p. 422-442, maio 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 4. | | NOCELLI, R. C. F.; PIRES, C.; TOREZANI, K.; CIONE, A. P.; SHIWA, A.; TONELLI, C.; MARCONDES, C.; BELCHIOR, C.; VIANA-SILVA, F.; GUIMARÃES, G.; TEIXEIRA, I.; CHAM, K.; BORGES, L.; MALASPINA, O. Matrix of selection for Brazilian bee species to risk assessement. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM HAZARDS OF PESTICIDES TO BEES, 13., 2017, Valencia. [Abstracts...]Ontario: International Commission for Plant Pollinator Relationships (ICPPR), 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|  |
| 5. | | GUIMARÃES-CESTARO, L.; SERRÃO, J. E.; MARTINS, M. F.; MARTÍNEZ, L. C.; ALVES, M. L. T. M. F.; LAZZARINI, K. R. G.; NOCELLI, R. C. F.; MALASPINA, O.; EVANS, J. D.; TEIXEIRA, E. W. Viruses, microsporidia and glyphosate residues in Africanized honey bees Apis mellifera, under field conditions. Journal of Apicultural Research, v. 63, n. 2, p. 245-255, 2024.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 6. | | VALK, H. van der; KOOMEN, I.; NOCELLI, R. C. F.; RIBEIRO, M. de F.; FREITAS, B. M.; CARVALHO, S.; KASINA, J. M.; MARTINS, D.; MUTISO, M.; ODHIAMBO, C.; KINUTHIA, W.; GIKUNGU, M.; NGARUIYA, P.; MAINA, G.; KIPYAB, P.; BLACQUIERE, T.; STEEN, J. van der; ROESSINK, I.; WASSENBER, J.; HERREN, B. G. Aspects determining the risk of pesticides to wild bees: risk profiles for focal crops on three continents. Julius Kühn Archiv, n. 437, p. 142-158, 2012. Edição dos Proceedings of the 11 International Symposium Hazards of Pesticides to Bees, Wageningen, nov. 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 7. | | CHAM, K. O.; NOCELLI, R. C. F.; BORGES, L. O.; VIANA-SILVA, F. E. C.; TONELLI, C. A. M.; MALASPINA, O.; MENEZES, C.; ROSA-FONTANA, A. S.; BLOCHTEIN, B.; FREITAS, B. M.; PIRES, C. S. S.; OLIVEIRA, F. F.; CONTRERA, F. A. L.; TOREZANI, K. R. S.; RIBEIRO, M. de F.; SIQUEIRA, M. A. L.; ROCHA, M. C. L. S. A. Pesticide exposure assessment paradigm for stingless bees. Environmental Entomology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 36-48, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 8. | | NUNES, C. E. P.; MATOS, C. R. A. de; SANTOS, C. F. dos; MENEZES, C.; PAULA, D. P.; ALVES, D. A.; PEREIRA, F. de M.; OLIVEIRA, F. F. de; BARONIO, G. J.; RESENDE, H. C.; ROMANOWSKI, H. P.; SANTOS JÚNIOR, J. E. dos; HIPÓLITO, J.; FREITAS, L.; CASTRO, L. B. de; CARVALHEIRO, L. G.; CASTRO, M. S. de; MARTINS, M. B.; MARINI FILHO, O. J.; TAVARES, P. F.; NOCELLI, R. C. F.; ANTONINI, Y.; RECH, A. R. Por que não transportar e criar espécies de abelhas-sem-ferrão fora de suas regiões de ocorrência natural?. Mensagem Doce, n. 175, p. 56-67, 2024.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Semiárido. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/12/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/04/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
CHAM, K. O.; NOCELLI, R. C. F.; BORGES, L. O.; VIANA-SILVA, F. E. C.; TONELLI, C. A. M.; MALASPINA, O.; MENEZES, C.; ROSA-FONTANA, A. S.; BLOCHTEIN, B.; FREITAS, B. M.; PIRES, C. S. S.; OLIVEIRA, F. F.; CONTRERA, F. A. L.; TOREZANI, K. R. S.; RIBEIRO, M. de F.; SIQUEIRA, M. A. L.; ROCHA, M. C. L. S. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
KARINA O. CHAM, IBAMA; ROBERTA C. F. NOCELLI, UFSCAR; LEANDRO O. BORGES, IBAMA; FLÁVIA ELIZABETH C. VIANA-SILVA, IBAMA; CARLOS AUGUSTO M. TONELLI, IBAMA; OSMAR MALASPINA, UNESP; CRISTIANO MENEZES, CNPMA; ANNELISE S. ROSA-FONTANA, UNESP; BETINA BLOCHTEIN, PUCRS; BRENO M. FREITAS, UFC; CARMEN SILVIA SOARES PIRES, Cenargen; FAVÍZIA F. OLIVEIRA, UFBA; FELIPE ANDRES L. CONTRERA, UFPA; KAROLINE R. S. TOREZANI, UNB; MARCIA DE FATIMA RIBEIRO, CPATSA; MARIA A. L. SIQUEIRA, UFV; MARIA CECÍLIA L. S. A. ROCHA, UFBA. |
|
Título: |
Pesticide exposure assessment paradigm for stingless bees. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Entomology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 36-48, 2019. |
|
DOI: |
10.1093/ee/nvy137 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Although the importance of bees as the pollinators responsible for maintaining gene flow for many native and cultivated plants in ecosystems around the world is recognized, much of their biodiversity and behavior remains to be discovered. Stingless bees are considered key pollinators for several plant species in tropical and subtropical ecosystems and they also provide pollination services for economically important agricultural crops. Many countries are using the honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a surrogate to evaluate the risk of pesticides to all species of bees. However, there is uncertainty regarding the extent to which honey bees can serve as surrogates for non-Apis bee species in the risk assessment for pesticides. This paper provides a short overview of the life history traits relevant in risk assessment of stingless bees. It summarizes what is known about stingless bee exposure to pesticides compared to that of honey bees and presents criteria for potential candidate species from Brazil for use in pesticide risk assessment in tropical environments. This paper also identifies gaps in knowledge of bee biology and pesticide exposure routes not covered by the current honey bee exposure assessment paradigm. Based on these gaps, research is needed on life history traits, estimates of nectar and pollen consumption, mud, resin, and water collection and available protocols to adequately assess toxic effects of pesticides to stingless bees. This review is part of a series of papers on the risk of exposure of non-Apis bees to pesticides. MenosAlthough the importance of bees as the pollinators responsible for maintaining gene flow for many native and cultivated plants in ecosystems around the world is recognized, much of their biodiversity and behavior remains to be discovered. Stingless bees are considered key pollinators for several plant species in tropical and subtropical ecosystems and they also provide pollination services for economically important agricultural crops. Many countries are using the honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a surrogate to evaluate the risk of pesticides to all species of bees. However, there is uncertainty regarding the extent to which honey bees can serve as surrogates for non-Apis bee species in the risk assessment for pesticides. This paper provides a short overview of the life history traits relevant in risk assessment of stingless bees. It summarizes what is known about stingless bee exposure to pesticides compared to that of honey bees and presents criteria for potential candidate species from Brazil for use in pesticide risk assessment in tropical environments. This paper also identifies gaps in knowledge of bee biology and pesticide exposure routes not covered by the current honey bee exposure assessment paradigm. Based on these gaps, research is needed on life history traits, estimates of nectar and pollen consumption, mud, resin, and water collection and available protocols to adequately assess toxic effects of pesticides to stingless bees. T... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Abelha sem ferrão; Meliponini; Non-Apis bees; Trigonini. |
|
Thesagro: |
Abelha; Biodiversidade; Biologia Animal; Polinização. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Melipona; Risk assessment. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02814naa a2200445 a 4500
001 2131190
005 2021-04-09
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1093/ee/nvy137$2DOI
100 1 $aCHAM, K. O.
245 $aPesticide exposure assessment paradigm for stingless bees.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aAlthough the importance of bees as the pollinators responsible for maintaining gene flow for many native and cultivated plants in ecosystems around the world is recognized, much of their biodiversity and behavior remains to be discovered. Stingless bees are considered key pollinators for several plant species in tropical and subtropical ecosystems and they also provide pollination services for economically important agricultural crops. Many countries are using the honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a surrogate to evaluate the risk of pesticides to all species of bees. However, there is uncertainty regarding the extent to which honey bees can serve as surrogates for non-Apis bee species in the risk assessment for pesticides. This paper provides a short overview of the life history traits relevant in risk assessment of stingless bees. It summarizes what is known about stingless bee exposure to pesticides compared to that of honey bees and presents criteria for potential candidate species from Brazil for use in pesticide risk assessment in tropical environments. This paper also identifies gaps in knowledge of bee biology and pesticide exposure routes not covered by the current honey bee exposure assessment paradigm. Based on these gaps, research is needed on life history traits, estimates of nectar and pollen consumption, mud, resin, and water collection and available protocols to adequately assess toxic effects of pesticides to stingless bees. This review is part of a series of papers on the risk of exposure of non-Apis bees to pesticides.
650 $aMelipona
650 $aRisk assessment
650 $aAbelha
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aBiologia Animal
650 $aPolinização
653 $aAbelha sem ferrão
653 $aMeliponini
653 $aNon-Apis bees
653 $aTrigonini
700 1 $aNOCELLI, R. C. F.
700 1 $aBORGES, L. O.
700 1 $aVIANA-SILVA, F. E. C.
700 1 $aTONELLI, C. A. M.
700 1 $aMALASPINA, O.
700 1 $aMENEZES, C.
700 1 $aROSA-FONTANA, A. S.
700 1 $aBLOCHTEIN, B.
700 1 $aFREITAS, B. M.
700 1 $aPIRES, C. S. S.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, F. F.
700 1 $aCONTRERA, F. A. L.
700 1 $aTOREZANI, K. R. S.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO, M. de F.
700 1 $aSIQUEIRA, M. A. L.
700 1 $aROCHA, M. C. L. S. A.
773 $tEnvironmental Entomology$gv. 48, n. 1, p. 36-48, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
