|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pecuária Sul; Embrapa Roraima; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. MenosEmbrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pecuária Sul; Embrapa Roraima... Mostrar Todas |
Data corrente: |
01/10/2004 |
Data da última atualização: |
22/11/2017 |
Título: |
MANUAL de segurança e qualidade para a cultura do amendoim. |
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: CampoPAS: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004. |
Páginas: |
39 p. |
Série: |
(Qualidade e Segurança dos Alimentos). |
ISBN: |
85-7383-231-2 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Notas: |
Convênio: CNI/SENAI/SEBRAE/EMBRAPA. |
Conteúdo: |
Sistema de produção. Etapa de pré-colheita. Etapa de pós-colheita. Fluxogramas de produção. Perigos na produção. Perigos químicos. Micotoxinas. Resíduos de defensivos agrotóxicos. Perigos físicos, biológicos. Aplicação do sistema APPCC. Formulários para caracterização da Empresa/Produto. Formulários A, B, C, D e E. Análise de perigos (Formulário G). Determinação dos PC/PCC (Formulário H). Resumo do plano APPCC (Formulário I). Glossário. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Amendoim - Cultura - Segurança dos alimentos - Brasil; Cultivo; Cultura; Groundnuts; Oil palms; Segurança. |
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Amendoim; Arachis Hypogaea; Planta Oleaginosa; Produção; Qualidade; Segurança Alimentar; Sistema de Produção. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
food safety; peanuts. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/18213/1/MANUALSEGURANCAQUALIDADEParaaculturadoamendoim.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01423nam a2200337 a 4500 001 1111848 005 2017-11-22 008 2004 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 020 $a85-7383-231-2 245 $aMANUAL de segurança e qualidade para a cultura do amendoim. 260 $aBrasília, DF: CampoPAS: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica$c2004 300 $a39 p. 490 $a(Qualidade e Segurança dos Alimentos). 500 $aConvênio: CNI/SENAI/SEBRAE/EMBRAPA. 520 $aSistema de produção. Etapa de pré-colheita. Etapa de pós-colheita. Fluxogramas de produção. Perigos na produção. Perigos químicos. Micotoxinas. Resíduos de defensivos agrotóxicos. Perigos físicos, biológicos. Aplicação do sistema APPCC. Formulários para caracterização da Empresa/Produto. Formulários A, B, C, D e E. Análise de perigos (Formulário G). Determinação dos PC/PCC (Formulário H). Resumo do plano APPCC (Formulário I). Glossário. 650 $afood safety 650 $apeanuts 650 $aAgricultura 650 $aAmendoim 650 $aArachis Hypogaea 650 $aPlanta Oleaginosa 650 $aProdução 650 $aQualidade 650 $aSegurança Alimentar 650 $aSistema de Produção 653 $aAmendoim - Cultura - Segurança dos alimentos - Brasil 653 $aCultivo 653 $aCultura 653 $aGroundnuts 653 $aOil palms 653 $aSegurança
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amapá. |
Data corrente: |
20/09/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
NEGREIROS, L. P.; NEVES, L. R.; TAVARES-DIAS, M. |
Afiliação: |
LUCIANO P. NEGREIROS, INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE EDUCAÇÃO, CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA DO ACRE; LIGIA R. NEVES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO AMAPÁ; MARCOS TAVARES DIAS, CPAF-AP. |
Título: |
Parasites in Leporinus macrocephalus (Anostomidae) of four fish farms from the western Amazon (Brazil). |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 93, n. 3, e20190988, 2021. |
ISSN: |
0001-3765 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120190988 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
This study evaluated the presence of metazoan parasites in Leporinus macrocephalus from four fi sh farms from the western Amazon (Brazil). In 160 fish examined, prevalence was 61.9%, and parasites found were: Urocleidoides paradoxus, Urocleidoides eremitus, Tereancistrum parvus, Jainus leporini, Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus, Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) acuminata, Dolops discoidalis and Ergasilus sp., but U. paradoxus was the dominant parasite. Jainus leporini and Ergasilus sp. occurred only in L. macrocephalus from one fi sh farm, while U. paradoxus, U. eremitus and T. parvus were found in fi sh from three fi sh farms. Dolops discoidalis, P. (S.) inopinatus and R. (R.) acuminata occurred only in L. macrocephalus from two fi sh farms. Higher infection levels were caused by U. paradoxus, U. eremitus and P. (S.) inopinatus, which had an aggregated dispersion. There was positive correlation between abundance of parasites and the length of hosts. No difference in the condition factor of parasitized and non-parasitized fi sh were found. Such differences between fish farms were attributed to differences in management and quality of cultivation environments, and data indicate the need to adopt prophylactic measures in the fish farms to prevent diseases in the future. This was the fi rst report of D. discoidalis and Ergasilus sp. for L. macrocephalus.The in vitro efficacy of the essential oil of Piper callosum, Piper hispidum and Piper marginatum against monogeneans and the tolerance of Colossoma macropomum to these oils was assessed. Concentrations of these essential oils were tested, and two control groups were used: one with water from the cultivation tank only and the other with water from the cultivation tank + 70% alcohol, the solvent for these essential oils. For all the concentrations of P. callosum, 100% efficacy against Anacanthorus spathulatus, Notozothecium janauachensis, Mymarothecium boegeri and Linguadactyloides brinkmanni occurred after 5 min of exposure. At concentrations of 600 and 800 mg/L of P. hispidum, 100% in vitro efficacy occurred after 20 min of exposure. At concentrations of 200, 300 and 400 mg/L of P. marginatum, 100% efficacy occurred after 1 h of exposure. In the control groups using water from the tank + alcohol, the total immobilization of the monogeneans varied, while in the control groups with water from the cultivation tank, the total immobilization of monogeneans only occurred after 9 h of exposure. Little structural damage to the tegument of the parasites exposed to P. callosum, P. hispidum and P. marginatum was observed on scanning electron microscopy. The tolerance of C. macropomum for P. callosum, P. hispidum and P. marginatum was assessed and discussed. The results suggest that the essential oils of P. callosum, P. hispidum and P. marginatum possess high in vitro efficacy against monogeneans of C. macropomum and thus require testing in therapeutant baths for use in aquaculture. MenosThis study evaluated the presence of metazoan parasites in Leporinus macrocephalus from four fi sh farms from the western Amazon (Brazil). In 160 fish examined, prevalence was 61.9%, and parasites found were: Urocleidoides paradoxus, Urocleidoides eremitus, Tereancistrum parvus, Jainus leporini, Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus, Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) acuminata, Dolops discoidalis and Ergasilus sp., but U. paradoxus was the dominant parasite. Jainus leporini and Ergasilus sp. occurred only in L. macrocephalus from one fi sh farm, while U. paradoxus, U. eremitus and T. parvus were found in fi sh from three fi sh farms. Dolops discoidalis, P. (S.) inopinatus and R. (R.) acuminata occurred only in L. macrocephalus from two fi sh farms. Higher infection levels were caused by U. paradoxus, U. eremitus and P. (S.) inopinatus, which had an aggregated dispersion. There was positive correlation between abundance of parasites and the length of hosts. No difference in the condition factor of parasitized and non-parasitized fi sh were found. Such differences between fish farms were attributed to differences in management and quality of cultivation environments, and data indicate the need to adopt prophylactic measures in the fish farms to prevent diseases in the future. This was the fi rst report of D. discoidalis and Ergasilus sp. for L. macrocephalus.The in vitro efficacy of the essential oil of Piper callosum, Piper hispidum and Piper marginatum against monogeneans and t... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Parasitose; Peixe. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Anostomidae. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/240704/1/CPAF-AP-2022-Parasites-in-Leoporinus.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03631naa a2200205 a 4500 001 2146627 005 2022-11-10 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0001-3765 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120190988$2DOI 100 1 $aNEGREIROS, L. P. 245 $aParasites in Leporinus macrocephalus (Anostomidae) of four fish farms from the western Amazon (Brazil).$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 520 $aThis study evaluated the presence of metazoan parasites in Leporinus macrocephalus from four fi sh farms from the western Amazon (Brazil). In 160 fish examined, prevalence was 61.9%, and parasites found were: Urocleidoides paradoxus, Urocleidoides eremitus, Tereancistrum parvus, Jainus leporini, Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus, Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) acuminata, Dolops discoidalis and Ergasilus sp., but U. paradoxus was the dominant parasite. Jainus leporini and Ergasilus sp. occurred only in L. macrocephalus from one fi sh farm, while U. paradoxus, U. eremitus and T. parvus were found in fi sh from three fi sh farms. Dolops discoidalis, P. (S.) inopinatus and R. (R.) acuminata occurred only in L. macrocephalus from two fi sh farms. Higher infection levels were caused by U. paradoxus, U. eremitus and P. (S.) inopinatus, which had an aggregated dispersion. There was positive correlation between abundance of parasites and the length of hosts. No difference in the condition factor of parasitized and non-parasitized fi sh were found. Such differences between fish farms were attributed to differences in management and quality of cultivation environments, and data indicate the need to adopt prophylactic measures in the fish farms to prevent diseases in the future. This was the fi rst report of D. discoidalis and Ergasilus sp. for L. macrocephalus.The in vitro efficacy of the essential oil of Piper callosum, Piper hispidum and Piper marginatum against monogeneans and the tolerance of Colossoma macropomum to these oils was assessed. Concentrations of these essential oils were tested, and two control groups were used: one with water from the cultivation tank only and the other with water from the cultivation tank + 70% alcohol, the solvent for these essential oils. For all the concentrations of P. callosum, 100% efficacy against Anacanthorus spathulatus, Notozothecium janauachensis, Mymarothecium boegeri and Linguadactyloides brinkmanni occurred after 5 min of exposure. At concentrations of 600 and 800 mg/L of P. hispidum, 100% in vitro efficacy occurred after 20 min of exposure. At concentrations of 200, 300 and 400 mg/L of P. marginatum, 100% efficacy occurred after 1 h of exposure. In the control groups using water from the tank + alcohol, the total immobilization of the monogeneans varied, while in the control groups with water from the cultivation tank, the total immobilization of monogeneans only occurred after 9 h of exposure. Little structural damage to the tegument of the parasites exposed to P. callosum, P. hispidum and P. marginatum was observed on scanning electron microscopy. The tolerance of C. macropomum for P. callosum, P. hispidum and P. marginatum was assessed and discussed. The results suggest that the essential oils of P. callosum, P. hispidum and P. marginatum possess high in vitro efficacy against monogeneans of C. macropomum and thus require testing in therapeutant baths for use in aquaculture. 650 $aAnostomidae 650 $aParasitose 650 $aPeixe 700 1 $aNEVES, L. R. 700 1 $aTAVARES-DIAS, M. 773 $tAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências$gv. 93, n. 3, e20190988, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amapá (CPAF-AP) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|