|
|
Registros recuperados : 518 | |
61. | | WASKOW, V. H.; NAVA, D. E.; MELO, M. Índice de infestação de moscas-das-frutas e biodiversidade de parasitoides em pessegueiro conduzidos sob diferentes sistemas de produção. In: CONGRESSO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 19.; MOSTRA DE PÓS GRADUAÇÃO, 9.; CONGRESSO DE EXTENSÃO, 2., 2010, Pelotas, Anais... Pelotas: UCPel, 2010. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
70. | | NUNES, A. M.; GARCIA, M. S.; NAVA, D. E. Parasitóides associados à anastrepha fraterculus em frutíferas nativas, na localidade de Pelotas, RS. In: CONGRESSO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 2.; ENCONTRO DE PÓS GRADUAÇÃO DA EMBRAPA CLIMA TEMPERADO, 2., 2008, Pelotas. anais... Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2008. P. 49-52 Volume 2. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
79. | | ONGARATTO, S.; PONCIO, S.; MULLER, F. A.; NAVA, D. E. Sobrevivência de adultos de Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) oriundos de larvas de Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) criadas em diferentes dietas. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 26.; CONGRESSO LATINO-AMERICANO DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 9., 2016, Maceió. Anais... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 518 | |
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
07/05/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
31/10/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
PARANHOS, B. A. J.; NAVA, D. E.; MALAVASI, A. |
Afiliação: |
BEATRIZ AGUIAR GIORDANO PARANHOS, CPATSA; DORI EDSON NAVA, CPACT; Aldo Malavasi, International Atomic Energy Agency/Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. |
Título: |
Biological control of fruit flies in Brazil. |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 54, e26037, 2019. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Título em português: Controle biológico de moscas-das-frutas no Brasil. |
Conteúdo: |
Fruit flies are the main pests of fruit growing in Brazil. They have been managed predominantly with the use of insecticides applied as cover spray and/or as toxic baits. Currently, the trend of management strategies is toward the adoption of methods that cause the lowest environmental impact in large areas. In this context, biological control is an excellent option to be used together with other management strategies, such as sterile insects, because it leaves no residues, does not disturb nontarget pests, and can be permanent if the natural enemy establishes itself in the field. This review paper addresses the current knowledge on the biological control of fruit flies in Brazil, highlighting the great biodiversity of its natural enemies, especially parasitoids, its biology and ecology. The classical biological control programs in Brazil are also reported, from the introduction of Tetrastichus giffardianus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), in 1937, for the control of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), to that of Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), in 2012, for the control of Bactrocera carambolae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Finally, the obtained advances are pointed out, as well as the main bottlenecks and perspectives for the effective use of biological control programs against fruit flies. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Biological control programs; Classical biological control; Controle biológico natural; Natural biological control; Programas de controle biológico. |
Thesagro: |
Díptera; Mosca das Frutas. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Braconidae; Figitidae; Fruit flies. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/204010/1/Biological-control-of-fruit-2019.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/197064/1/Biological-control-of-fruit-flies.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02180naa a2200277 a 4500 001 2113605 005 2019-10-31 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPARANHOS, B. A. J. 245 $aBiological control of fruit flies in Brazil.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 500 $aTítulo em português: Controle biológico de moscas-das-frutas no Brasil. 520 $aFruit flies are the main pests of fruit growing in Brazil. They have been managed predominantly with the use of insecticides applied as cover spray and/or as toxic baits. Currently, the trend of management strategies is toward the adoption of methods that cause the lowest environmental impact in large areas. In this context, biological control is an excellent option to be used together with other management strategies, such as sterile insects, because it leaves no residues, does not disturb nontarget pests, and can be permanent if the natural enemy establishes itself in the field. This review paper addresses the current knowledge on the biological control of fruit flies in Brazil, highlighting the great biodiversity of its natural enemies, especially parasitoids, its biology and ecology. The classical biological control programs in Brazil are also reported, from the introduction of Tetrastichus giffardianus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), in 1937, for the control of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), to that of Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), in 2012, for the control of Bactrocera carambolae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Finally, the obtained advances are pointed out, as well as the main bottlenecks and perspectives for the effective use of biological control programs against fruit flies. 650 $aBraconidae 650 $aFigitidae 650 $aFruit flies 650 $aDíptera 650 $aMosca das Frutas 653 $aBiological control programs 653 $aClassical biological control 653 $aControle biológico natural 653 $aNatural biological control 653 $aProgramas de controle biológico 700 1 $aNAVA, D. E. 700 1 $aMALAVASI, A. 773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira$gv. 54, e26037, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|