| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 8.263 | |
| 5161. |  | SILVA, V. C. P. da; NONDILLO, A.; GALZER, E. C. W.; BOTTON, M. Effect of host plants on the development, survivorship, and reproduction of Pseudococcus viburni (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Florida Entomologist, v. 100, n. 4, p. 718-724, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|    |
| 5162. | | PESSOA, M. C. P. Y.; MINGOTI, R.; MORIYA, L. M.; PIVA, P. L. B.; DIOGO, M. de S. Estimativas do desenvolvimento de Amblypelta nitida por demandas térmicas em área de macadâmia de São Paulo. In: OLIVEIRA-JUNIOR, J. M. B.; CALVÃO, L. B. (org.). Entomologia: estudos sobre a biodiversidade, fisiologia, controle e importância médica dos insetos 2. Ponta Grossa, PR: Atena, 2022. cap. 1. p. 1-13.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| 5164. | | SOUZA, J. R. de; PEREIRA, F. A. da S.; LIMA, M. H. F.; M. NETO, A. J. de; SANTIAGO, C. M.; ABREU, G. B.; BARRIGOSSI, J. A. F. Estratégias de manejo integrado para Rupela albinella Cramer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) na cultura do arroz na região da Baixada Maranhense, Brasil. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 28., 2022, Fortaleza. Anais... Fortaleza: SEB, 2022. p. 705.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| 5165. | | MACHOTA JUNIOR, R.; BORTOLI, L. C.; LOECK, A. E.; GARCIA, F. R. M.; BOTTON, M. Estratégia atrativa. Cultivar Hortaliças e Frutas, Pelotas, v. 11, n. 81, p.20-23, ago./set. 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 5180. | | CONTE, O.; OLIVEIRA, F. T. de; HARGER, N.; CORRÊA-FERREIRA, B. S.; ROGGIA, S.; PRANDO, A. M.; POSSAMAI, E. J.; REIS, E. A.; MARX, E. F. Resultados do manejo integrado de pragas da soja na safra 2018/19 no Paraná. Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 2019. 63 p. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 416).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 8.263 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/09/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/09/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, J. N.; LENNOX, G. D.; GARDNER, T. A.; THOMSON, J. R.; BERENGUER, E.; LEES, A. C.; MAC BALLY, R.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; FERRAZ, S. F. B.; LOUZADA, J.; MOURA, N. G.; OLIVEIRA, V. H. F.; PARDINI, R.; SOLAR, R. R. C.; VIEIRA, I. C. G.; BARLOW, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; Gareth D. Lennox, Lancaster University; Toby A. Gardner, Stockholm Environment Institute / International Institute for Sustainability; James R. Thomson, University of Canberra / Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research; Erika Berenguer, Lancaster University / University of Oxford; Alexander C. Lees, Manchester Metropolitan University / Cornell University; Ralph Mac Nally, University of Canberra / Sunrise Ecological Research Institute; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, INPE / University of Exeter; Silvio F. B. Ferraz, ESALQ/USP; Julio Louzada, UFLA; Nárgila G. Moura, MPEG; Victor H. F. Oliveira, UFLA; Renata Pardini, UFLA; Ricardo R. C. Solar, UFLA; Ima C. G. Vieira, MPEG; Jos Barlow, Lancaster University / UFLA / MPEG. |
|
Título: |
Carbon-focused conservation may fail to protect the most biodiverse tropical forests. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature Climate Change, v. 8, n. 8, p. 744-749, Aug. 2018. |
|
DOI: |
10.1038/s41558-018-0225-7 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
As one of Earth's most carbon-dense regions, tropical forests are central to climate change mitigation efforts. Their unparalleled species richness also makes them vital for safeguarding biodiversity. However, because research has not been conducted at management-relevant scales and has often not accounted for forest disturbance, the biodiversity implications of carbon conservation strategies remain poorly understood. We investigated tropical carbon?biodiversity relationships and trade-offs along a forest-disturbance gradient, using detailed and extensive carbon and biodiversity datasets. Biodiversity was positively associated with carbon in secondary and highly disturbed primary forests. Positive carbon?biodiversity relationships dissipated at around 100 MgC ha?1, meaning that in less disturbed forests more carbon did not equal more biodiversity. Simulated carbon conservation schemes therefore failed to protect many species in the most species-rich forests. These biodiversity shortfalls were sensitive to opportunity costs and could be decreased for small carbon penalties. To ensure that the most ecologically valuable forests are protected, biodiversity needs to be incorporated into carbon conservation planning. |
|
Thesagro: |
Carbono; Conservação; Floresta Tropical. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02231naa a2200349 a 4500
001 2095095
005 2018-09-05
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1038/s41558-018-0225-7$2DOI
100 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N.
245 $aCarbon-focused conservation may fail to protect the most biodiverse tropical forests.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aAs one of Earth's most carbon-dense regions, tropical forests are central to climate change mitigation efforts. Their unparalleled species richness also makes them vital for safeguarding biodiversity. However, because research has not been conducted at management-relevant scales and has often not accounted for forest disturbance, the biodiversity implications of carbon conservation strategies remain poorly understood. We investigated tropical carbon?biodiversity relationships and trade-offs along a forest-disturbance gradient, using detailed and extensive carbon and biodiversity datasets. Biodiversity was positively associated with carbon in secondary and highly disturbed primary forests. Positive carbon?biodiversity relationships dissipated at around 100 MgC ha?1, meaning that in less disturbed forests more carbon did not equal more biodiversity. Simulated carbon conservation schemes therefore failed to protect many species in the most species-rich forests. These biodiversity shortfalls were sensitive to opportunity costs and could be decreased for small carbon penalties. To ensure that the most ecologically valuable forests are protected, biodiversity needs to be incorporated into carbon conservation planning.
650 $aCarbono
650 $aConservação
650 $aFloresta Tropical
700 1 $aLENNOX, G. D.
700 1 $aGARDNER, T. A.
700 1 $aTHOMSON, J. R.
700 1 $aBERENGUER, E.
700 1 $aLEES, A. C.
700 1 $aMAC BALLY, R.
700 1 $aARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.
700 1 $aFERRAZ, S. F. B.
700 1 $aLOUZADA, J.
700 1 $aMOURA, N. G.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, V. H. F.
700 1 $aPARDINI, R.
700 1 $aSOLAR, R. R. C.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I. C. G.
700 1 $aBARLOW, J.
773 $tNature Climate Change$gv. 8, n. 8, p. 744-749, Aug. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
