| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 79 | |
| 30. |  | COSTA, N. P.; FRANÇA-NETO, J. B.; KRZYZANOWSKI, F. C.; HENNING, A. A.; MESQUITA, C. M. Antecipacao de colheita de sementes de soja. Informativo ABRATES, Londrina, v.11, n.2, p.96, set. 2001. Numero especial, ref. 101. Edicao de Resumos do XII Congresso Brasileiro de Sementes, 17 a 20 de Setembro de 2001, Curitiba, PR.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|    |
| 31. | | COSTA, N. P.; MESQUITA, C. M.; ANDRADE, J. G. M.; MAURINA, A. C.; PEREIRA, J. E. Controle de qualidade da soja brasileira na prevencao e na reducao de desperdicios de sementes e graos de soja. In: REUNIAO DE PESQUISA DA SOJA DA REGIAO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 20., 1998, Londrina. Ata e resumos. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo, 1998. p.405-406. (EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Documentos, 121).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 32. | | MESQUITA, C. M.; COSTA, N. P.; MAURINA, A. C.; ANDRADE, J. G. M.; PEREIRA, J. E. Colheita mecanica da soja: reducao de perdas em vinte anos. Engenharia Agricola, Jaboticabal, v.18, n.2., p.71-80, dez. 1998.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 33. | | COSTA, N. P. da; MESQUITA, C. M.; MAURINA, A. C.; PORTUGAL, F. F. Avaliação das perdas de sementes na colheita mecânica da soja, através do concurso municipal de Cambé, PR. Informativo ABRATES, Pelotas, v. 16, n.1/3, p. 27, mar. 2006. Edição dos Resumos do XIV Congresso Brasileiro de Sementes, Foz do Iguaçu, ago. 2005.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 35. | | MESQUITA, C. M.; COSTA, N. P.; PEREIRA, J. E.; MAURINA, A. C.; ANDRADE, J. G. M. Avaliacao da colheita mecanica da soja no Parana quanto a qualidade fisica do grao. In: REUNIAO DE PESQUISA DA SOJA DA REGIAO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 20., 1998, Londrina. Ata e Resumos. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo, 1998. p.176-177. (EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Documentos, 121).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 39. | | MESQUITA, C. M.; COSTA, N. P.; MAURINA, A. C.; ANDRADE, J. G. M.; PEREIRA, J. E. Levantamento e prevencao de perdas na colheita de soja no Parana durante vinte safras. In: REUNIAO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIAO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 20., 1998, Londrina. Ata e resumos. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo, 1998. p.176. (EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Documentos, 121).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 79 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/11/2005 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/10/2007 |
|
Autoria: |
MESQUITA, C. M.; HANNA, M. A.; COSTA, N. P. |
|
Título: |
Self-propelled prototype soybean harvester. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2005 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Transactions of the Asae, St. Joseph, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1301-1310, 2005. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
A four-row self-propelled prototype of a new and simplified concept soybean harvester was built and fied tested as part of a major project acrried out for several years. The prototype threshes soybeans from standing, uncut plants using impact energy provided by plastic fingers mounted on opposite rotating shafts, and uses a pneumatic system for capturing, separating, cleaning, and transporting the beans. Compared to ten different combines from each of three brands with conventional tangentially fed threshing systems, and ten different combines from a brand with an axial-flow threshing system, the prototype-harvested seeds were significantly better with respect to broken/split beans and seed coat damage than all the combines with tangentially fed threshing systems. The amounts of material-other-than-grain (MOG) in the sample harvested with the prototype were significantly less than for all conventional brands. The seed vigor of the sample from the prototype was significantly better than those from one of the combine brands with a tangentially fed threshing system. Invisible mechanical damage, germination, and grain field losses were not statistically different between the prototype and all combine brands evaluated. The overall results confirmed the better quality of the collected beans, including that obtained with previous versions of the prototype. It also showed that the harvesting module, initially designed for small and medium-size farms, was adaptable to a sel-propelled unit and therefore to larger-scale operations. MenosA four-row self-propelled prototype of a new and simplified concept soybean harvester was built and fied tested as part of a major project acrried out for several years. The prototype threshes soybeans from standing, uncut plants using impact energy provided by plastic fingers mounted on opposite rotating shafts, and uses a pneumatic system for capturing, separating, cleaning, and transporting the beans. Compared to ten different combines from each of three brands with conventional tangentially fed threshing systems, and ten different combines from a brand with an axial-flow threshing system, the prototype-harvested seeds were significantly better with respect to broken/split beans and seed coat damage than all the combines with tangentially fed threshing systems. The amounts of material-other-than-grain (MOG) in the sample harvested with the prototype were significantly less than for all conventional brands. The seed vigor of the sample from the prototype was significantly better than those from one of the combine brands with a tangentially fed threshing system. Invisible mechanical damage, germination, and grain field losses were not statistically different between the prototype and all combine brands evaluated. The overall results confirmed the better quality of the collected beans, including that obtained with previous versions of the prototype. It also showed that the harvesting module, initially designed for small and medium-size farms, was adaptable to a sel-propelled... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Colheita; Dano Mecânico; Soja. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02020naa a2200181 a 4500
001 1468604
005 2007-10-05
008 2005 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aMESQUITA, C. M.
245 $aSelf-propelled prototype soybean harvester.
260 $c2005
520 $aA four-row self-propelled prototype of a new and simplified concept soybean harvester was built and fied tested as part of a major project acrried out for several years. The prototype threshes soybeans from standing, uncut plants using impact energy provided by plastic fingers mounted on opposite rotating shafts, and uses a pneumatic system for capturing, separating, cleaning, and transporting the beans. Compared to ten different combines from each of three brands with conventional tangentially fed threshing systems, and ten different combines from a brand with an axial-flow threshing system, the prototype-harvested seeds were significantly better with respect to broken/split beans and seed coat damage than all the combines with tangentially fed threshing systems. The amounts of material-other-than-grain (MOG) in the sample harvested with the prototype were significantly less than for all conventional brands. The seed vigor of the sample from the prototype was significantly better than those from one of the combine brands with a tangentially fed threshing system. Invisible mechanical damage, germination, and grain field losses were not statistically different between the prototype and all combine brands evaluated. The overall results confirmed the better quality of the collected beans, including that obtained with previous versions of the prototype. It also showed that the harvesting module, initially designed for small and medium-size farms, was adaptable to a sel-propelled unit and therefore to larger-scale operations.
650 $aColheita
650 $aDano Mecânico
650 $aSoja
700 1 $aHANNA, M. A.
700 1 $aCOSTA, N. P.
773 $tTransactions of the Asae, St. Joseph$gv. 48, n. 4, p. 1301-1310, 2005.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
