| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
| 1. |  | DA SILVA, C. J.; CARNIELO, M. A.; GUARIN NETO, G.; SANTOS, S. A.; ISHII, I.; DAMASCENO, G.; POTT, A.; RESENDE, E. K. de; T. IRIGARAY; Y. GALDINO. Human dimensions of the biodiversity in the Pantanal wetland. In: INTECOL INTERNATIONAL WETLANDS CONFERENCE, 8., Cuiabá, 2008. Big wetlands, big concerns: abstracts. [Sl.: s.n], 2008. p.66| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
|   |
| 2. | | POTT, A.; POTT, V. J.; NUNES DA CUNHA, C.; DAMASCENO, G.; SALIS, S. M.; SANTOS, S. A.; DIAS, E. S.; SARTORI, A.; GUARIN NETO, G.; M. A. SCARNIELLO; ISHII, I. H. Flora the Pantanal wetland. In: INTECOL INTERNATIONAL WETLANDS CONFERENCE, 8., Cuiabá, 2008. Big wetlands, big concerns: abstracts. [Sl.: s.n], 2008. p.172| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Territorial. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/10/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/05/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
VICTORIA, D. de C.; MELLO, J. S. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
DANIEL DE CASTRO VICTORIA, CNPM; JULIA SANGUINETTI DE MELLO, Bolsista/CNPM. |
|
Título: |
Avaliação de diferentes métodos para estimativa de áreas marginais de cursos d'água na bacia do rio Ji-Paraná (RO). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO, 15., 2011, Curitiba. Anais... São José dos Campos: INPE, 2011. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 3890-3897. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Brazilian legislation considers river margins as environmental preservation areas that should not be used for agricultural production or other commercial activities. For small areas, were detailed cartographic data is available, the definition of these areas are simpler tasks however, Country wide estimates of protected area is still a mater of debate. For large area estimates, two mains uncertainties occur. The lack of detailed cartographic data at suitable scales under-represents the river channels and thus, makes it difficult to estimate total river length. Also, marginal preservation areas are a function of channel width, an information often lacking but crucial for the correct estimation of protected areas in large river basins. Here, three methods for estimating marginal preservation areas are applied to the Ji-Paraná river basin (RO, Brazil) in order to evaluate the importance of channel width. The first considers a constant width along the entire river network for estimating preserved area. The second divides the basin according to the location of fluviometric stations and prescribes different widths for each sub-basin while the third estimates channel width based on an area:width relationship. Total protected area for the three methods ranges from 2% to 21% of basin area, making it clear that channel width should be taken into account when estimating protected areas for large regions and that the methods and assumption used in defining such areas should be clearly stated in order to avoid precipitated conclusions. MenosBrazilian legislation considers river margins as environmental preservation areas that should not be used for agricultural production or other commercial activities. For small areas, were detailed cartographic data is available, the definition of these areas are simpler tasks however, Country wide estimates of protected area is still a mater of debate. For large area estimates, two mains uncertainties occur. The lack of detailed cartographic data at suitable scales under-represents the river channels and thus, makes it difficult to estimate total river length. Also, marginal preservation areas are a function of channel width, an information often lacking but crucial for the correct estimation of protected areas in large river basins. Here, three methods for estimating marginal preservation areas are applied to the Ji-Paraná river basin (RO, Brazil) in order to evaluate the importance of channel width. The first considers a constant width along the entire river network for estimating preserved area. The second divides the basin according to the location of fluviometric stations and prescribes different widths for each sub-basin while the third estimates channel width based on an area:width relationship. Total protected area for the three methods ranges from 2% to 21% of basin area, making it clear that channel width should be taken into account when estimating protected areas for large regions and that the methods and assumption used in defining such areas should be clearly s... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Área de preservação permanente; Lesgislação ambiental; Margem de rio. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/42864/1/DanielV1-SBSR.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02173nam a2200169 a 4500
001 1902343
005 2019-05-03
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aVICTORIA, D. de C.
245 $aAvaliação de diferentes métodos para estimativa de áreas marginais de cursos d'água na bacia do rio Ji-Paraná (RO).
260 $aIn: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO, 15., 2011, Curitiba. Anais... São José dos Campos: INPE$c2011
300 $ap. 3890-3897.
520 $aBrazilian legislation considers river margins as environmental preservation areas that should not be used for agricultural production or other commercial activities. For small areas, were detailed cartographic data is available, the definition of these areas are simpler tasks however, Country wide estimates of protected area is still a mater of debate. For large area estimates, two mains uncertainties occur. The lack of detailed cartographic data at suitable scales under-represents the river channels and thus, makes it difficult to estimate total river length. Also, marginal preservation areas are a function of channel width, an information often lacking but crucial for the correct estimation of protected areas in large river basins. Here, three methods for estimating marginal preservation areas are applied to the Ji-Paraná river basin (RO, Brazil) in order to evaluate the importance of channel width. The first considers a constant width along the entire river network for estimating preserved area. The second divides the basin according to the location of fluviometric stations and prescribes different widths for each sub-basin while the third estimates channel width based on an area:width relationship. Total protected area for the three methods ranges from 2% to 21% of basin area, making it clear that channel width should be taken into account when estimating protected areas for large regions and that the methods and assumption used in defining such areas should be clearly stated in order to avoid precipitated conclusions.
653 $aÁrea de preservação permanente
653 $aLesgislação ambiental
653 $aMargem de rio
700 1 $aMELLO, J. S. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Territorial (CNPM) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
