|
|
Registros recuperados : 60 | |
1. | | MERCADO, L.; LLOYD, J.; CARSWELL, F.; MALHI, Y.; MEIR, P.; NOBRE, A. D. Modelling Amazonian forest eddy covariance data: a comparison of big leaf versus sun/shade medels for the C-14 tower at Manaus I. Canopy photosynthesis. Acta Amazonica, Manaus, v. 36, n. 1, p. 69-82, mar. 2006. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
2. | | BARRETO, J. R.; BERENGUER, E.; FERREIRA, J. N.; JOLY, C. A.; MALHI, Y.; SEIXAS, M. M. M. de; BARLOW, J. Assessing invertebrate herbivory in human-modified tropical forest canopies. Ecology and Evolution, v. 11, n. 9, p. 4012-4022, 2021. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
3. | | COSTA, R. F. da; PEREIRA, A. R.; FISCH, G.; CULF, A.; MALHI, Y.; NOBRE, C. A.; NOBRE, A. D. A mitigação do CO² atmosférico na Amazônia brasileira central durante um período seco. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, Santa Maria, v. 8, n. 2, p. 275-281, 2000. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
4. | | BERENGUER, E.; MALHI, Y.; BRANDO, P.; CORDEIRO, A. C. N.; FERREIRA, J. N.; FRANÇA, F.; ROSSI, L. C.; SEIXAS, M. M. M. de; BARLOW, J. Tree growth and stem carbon accumulation in human-modified Amazonian forests following drought and fire. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, v. 373, n. 1760, p. 1-8, Nov. 2018. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
5. | | MORAIS, T. M. O. de; BERENGUER, E.; BARLOW, J.; FRANÇA, F.; LENNOX, G. D.; MALHI, Y.; ROSSI, L. C.; SEIXAS, M. M. M. de; FERREIRA, J. N. Leaf-litter production in human-modified Amazonian forests following the El Niño-mediated drought and fires of 2015-2016. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 496, Article 119441, 2021. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
6. | | ANDRADE, V. S.; COSTA, J. N.; COSTA, A. L.; FERREIRA, W. M.; SILVA, M. A.; GONÇALVES, P. H.; ATAYDES JUNIOR, J.; MALHI, Y. Variação do dióxido de carbono no interior de um manguezal na Amazônia legal. In: CONFERÊNCIA CIENTÍFICA INTERNACIONAL AMAZÔNIA EM PERSPECTIVA, 2008, Manaus. ciência integrada para um futuro sustentável: conference abstracts. Manaus: LBA/GEOMA/PPBIo, 2008. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
7. | | WU, J.; CHAVANA-BRYANT, C.; PROHASKA, N.; SERBIN, S. P.; GUAN, K.; ALBERT, L. P.; YANG, X.; LEEUWEN, W. J. D. van; GARNELLO, A. J.; MARTINS, G.; MALHI, Y.; GERARD, F.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de; SALESKA, S. R. Convergence in relationships between leaf traits, spectra and age across diverse canopy environments and two contrasting tropical forests. New Phytologist, v. 214, n. 3, p. 1033-1048, May 2017. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
8. | | MALHI, Y.; MELACK, J.; GATTI, L. V.; OMETTO, J.; KESSELMEIER, J.; WOLFF, S.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O.; COSTA, M.; SALESKA, S.; PANGALA, S. R.; BASSO, L. S.; RIZZO, L.; ARAUJO, A. C. de; RESTREPO-COUPE, N. Biogeochemical cycles of the Amazon. In: SCIENCE panel for the Amazon: Amazon assessment report 2021: part I: The Amazon as a regional entity of the Earth system. New York, NY: United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2021. Cap. 6, pag. irregular. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
9. | | OLIVEIRA, P. J. de; COSTA, R. F. da; COSTA, A. C. L. da; COSTA, J. M. N. da; MALHI, Y.; MEIR, P.; SILVA, R. B. C.; ANDRADE, V. M. S.; SILVA JÚNIOR, J. A.; BRAGA, A.; GONÇALVES, P. H. L. Fechamento do balanço de energia em um ecossistema de manguezal paraense. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE AGROMETEOROLOGIA, 13., 2003, Santa Maria. Situação atual e perspectivas da agrometeorologia: anais... Santa Maria: UNIFRA: SBA: UFSM, 2003. p. 141-142. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
10. | | COSTA, R. F. da; SILVA, V. de P. R. da; RUIVO, M. L. P.; MEIR, P.; COSTA, A. C. L.; MALHI, Y. S.; BRAGA, A. P.; GONÇALVES, P. H. L.; SILVA JUNIOR, J. de A.; GRACE, J. Transpiração em espécie de grande porte na Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã, Pará. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, v.11, n.2,p.180-189, mar/abr.2007. 1 CD ROM. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Algodão. |
| |
11. | | RESTREPO-COUPE, N.; LEVINE, N. M.; CHRISTOFFERSEN, B. O.; ALBERT, L. P.; WU, J.; COSTA, M. H.; GALBRAITH, D.; IMBUZEIRO, H.; MARTINS, G.; ARAUJO, A. C. da; MALHI, Y. S.; ZENG, X.; MOORCROFT, P.; SALESKA, S. R. Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison. Global Change Biology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 191-208, Jan. 2017. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
12. | | WITHEY, K.; BERENGUER, E.; PALMEIRA, A. F.; ESPÍRITO-SANTO, F. D. B.; LENNOX, G. D.; SILVA, C. V. J.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; FERREIRA, J. N.; FRANÇA, F.; MALHI, Y.; ROSSI, L. C.; BARLOW, J. Quantifying immediate carbon emissions from El Ninõ-mediated wildfires in humid tropical forests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, v. 373, n. 1760, p. 1-11, Nov. 2018. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
13. | | ALVALA, R. C. S.; MANZI, A. O.; SA, L. D. A; MURTY, P. R. V. K.; GIELOW, R.; ARLINO, P. R. A.; ALVALA, P. C.; LIMA, I. D. T.; MARQUES FILHO, E. P. M.; SAMBATTI, S. B. M.; RANDOW, C. von; SOUZA, A. de S; KASSAR, E.; MALHI, Y. S.; KRUIJT, B.; MEIRELLES, M. L. Projeto interdisciplinar do Pantanal - fase umida (IPE - 1). In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE METEOROLOGIA, 10.; CONGRESSO DA FLISMET, 8., 1998, Brasilia, DF. [Anais]. [S.l.: s.n., 1998?]. n.p. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
14. | | BAKER, T. R.; PHILLIPS, O. L.; MALHI, Y.; ALMEIDA, S.; ARROYO, L.; DI FIORE, A.; ERWIN, T.; HIGUCHI, N.; KILLEEN, T. J.; LAURENCE, S. G.; LAURENCE, W. F.; LEWIS, S. L.; MONTEAGUDO, A.; NEILL, D. A.; NÚNEZ VARGAS, P.; PITMAN, N. C. A.; SILVA, J. N. M.; VÁSQUEZ MARTÍNEZ, R. Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, v. 359, n. 1443, p. 353-365, Mar. 2004. il. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
15. | | POWELL, T. I.; GALBRAITH, D. R.; CHRISTOFFERSEN, B. O.; HARPER, A.; IMBUZEIRO, H. M. A.; ROWLAND, L.; ALMEIDA, S.; BRANDO, P. M.; COSTA, A. C. L. da; COSTA, M. H.; LEVINE, N. M.; MALHI, Y.; SALESKA, S. R.; SOTTA, E.; WILLIAMS, M.; MEIR, P.; MOORCROFT, P. R. Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. New Phytologist, Cambridge, Jul. 2013. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amapá. |
| |
16. | | LEWIS, S. L.; PHILLIPS, O. L.; BAKER, T. R.; LLOYD, J.; MALHI, Y.; ALMEIDA, S.; HIGUCHI, N.; LAURANCE, W. F.; NEILL, D. A.; SILVA, J. N. M.; TERBORGH, J.; LEZAMA, A. T.; VÁSQUEZ MARTÍNEZ, R.; BROWN, S.; CHAVE, J.; KUEBLER, C.; NÚÑEZ VARGAS, P.; VINCETI, B. Concerted changes in tropical forest structure and dynamics: evidence from 50 South American long-term plots. Philippine Transactions of Royal Society of London, B, v. 359, n. 1443, p. 421-436, 2004. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
17. | | ROWLAND, L.; COSTA, A. C. L. da; GALBRAITH, D. R.; OLIVEIRA, R. S.; BINKS, O. J.; OLIVEIRA, A. A. R.; PULLEN, A. M.; DOUGHTY, C. E.; METCALFE, D. B.; VASCONCELOS, S. S.; FERREIRA, L. V.; MALHI, Y.; GRACE, J.; MENCUCCINI, M.; MEIR, P. Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature, v. 528, N. 7580, p. 119-122, 3 Dec. 2015. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
18. | | MALHI, Y.; WOOD, D.; BAKER, T. R.; WRIGHT, J.; PHILLIPS, O. L.; COCHRANE, T.; MEIR, P.; CHAVE, J.; ALMEIDA, S.; ARROYO, L.; HIGUCHI, N.; KILLEEN, T. J.; LAURANCE, S. G.; LEWIS, S. L.; MONTEAGUDO, A.; NEILL, D. A.; VARGAS, P. N.; PITMAN, N. C. A.; QUESADA, C. A.; SALOMÃO, R.; SILVA, J. N. M.; LEZAMA, A. T.; TERBORGH, J.; MARTÍNEZ, R. V.; VINCETI, B. The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old-growth Amazonian forests. Global Change Biology, v. 12, n. 7, p. 1107-1138, July 2006. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
19. | | COSTA, A. C. L. da; ALMEIDA, S. S. de; CARVALHO, C. R.; MEIR, P.; MALHI, Y.; COSTA, R. F. da; SILVA JUNIOR, J. de A. da; COSTA, M. C. da; TANAKA, B. T.; FISHER, R. A.; SOTTA, E. D.; OLIVEIRA, L. L.; GONÇALVES, P. H. L.; BRAGA, A. P.; BARRETO, P. N. Experimento Esecaflor-LBA em Caxiuanã. In: LISBOA, P. L. B. (Org.). Caxiuanã: desafios para a conservação de uma Floresta Nacional na Amazônia. Belém, PA: Museu Paraense Emílio Goedi, 2009. p. 45-90. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
20. | | BERENGUER, E.; LENNOX, G. D.; FERREIRA, J. N.; MALHI, Y.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; BARRETO, J. R.; ESPÍRITO-SANTO, F. del B.; FIGUEIREDO, A. E. S.; FRANÇA, F.; GARDNER, T. A.; JOLY, C. A.; PALMEIRA, A. F.; QUESADA, C. A.; ROSSI, L. C.; SEIXAS, M. M. M. de; SMITH, C. C.; WITHEY, K.; BARLOW, J. Tracking the impacts of El Niño drought and fire in human-modified Amazonian forests. PNAS, v. 118, n. 30, e201937711, 2021. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 60 | |
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amapá. |
Data corrente: |
04/09/2013 |
Data da última atualização: |
04/09/2013 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
POWELL, T. I.; GALBRAITH, D. R.; CHRISTOFFERSEN, B. O.; HARPER, A.; IMBUZEIRO, H. M. A.; ROWLAND, L.; ALMEIDA, S.; BRANDO, P. M.; COSTA, A. C. L. da; COSTA, M. H.; LEVINE, N. M.; MALHI, Y.; SALESKA, S. R.; SOTTA, E.; WILLIAMS, M.; MEIR, P.; MOORCROFT, P. R. |
Afiliação: |
Thomas L. Powell, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; David R. Galbraith, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK; Bradley O. Christoffersen, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; Anna Harper, College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK; Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; Hewlley M. A. Imbuzeiro, Grupo de Pesquisas em Interação Atmosfera-Biosfera, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, CEP 36570-000, Minas Gerias, Brazil; Lucy Rowland, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK; Samuel Almeida, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, CEP 66077-530, Para, Brazil; Paulo M. Brando, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, CEP 71503-505, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa, Centro de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Para, Belem, CEP 66017-970, Para, Brazil; Marcos Heil Costa, Grupo de Pesquisas em Interac~ao Atmosfera-Biosfera, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, CEP 36570-000, Minas Gerias, Brazil; Naomi M. Levine, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Yadvinder Malhi, Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK; Scott R. Saleska, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; ELENEIDE DOFF SOTTA, CPAF-AP; Mathew Williams, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK; Patrick Meir, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK; Paul R. Moorcroft, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. |
Título: |
Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. |
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
New Phytologist, Cambridge, Jul. 2013. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Considerable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil?Plant?Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought. MenosConsiderable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil?Plant?Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenolog... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Ciclo do cabono; Modelo de biosfera terrestre; Terrestrial biosphere model; Tropical rainforest. |
Thesagro: |
Floresta tropical. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
carbon cycle. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/89031/1/CPAFAP-2013-Confronting-model-predictions-of-carbon.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02802naa a2200385 a 4500 001 1965567 005 2013-09-04 008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPOWELL, T. I. 245 $aConfronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2013 520 $aConsiderable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil?Plant?Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought. 650 $acarbon cycle 650 $aFloresta tropical 653 $aCiclo do cabono 653 $aModelo de biosfera terrestre 653 $aTerrestrial biosphere model 653 $aTropical rainforest 700 1 $aGALBRAITH, D. R. 700 1 $aCHRISTOFFERSEN, B. O. 700 1 $aHARPER, A. 700 1 $aIMBUZEIRO, H. M. A. 700 1 $aROWLAND, L. 700 1 $aALMEIDA, S. 700 1 $aBRANDO, P. M. 700 1 $aCOSTA, A. C. L. da 700 1 $aCOSTA, M. H. 700 1 $aLEVINE, N. M. 700 1 $aMALHI, Y. 700 1 $aSALESKA, S. R. 700 1 $aSOTTA, E. 700 1 $aWILLIAMS, M. 700 1 $aMEIR, P. 700 1 $aMOORCROFT, P. R. 773 $tNew Phytologist, Cambridge, Jul. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amapá (CPAF-AP) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|