| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 11 | |
| 5. |  | MALAVASI, M. M.; DAVIDE, A. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. M.; MACHADO, C. F.; TONETTI, O. A. O. Avaliacao da qualidade fisiologica de sementes de tingui (Magonia pubescens St. Hil. Sapindaceae), atraves do teste de tetrazolio. Informativo ABRATES, Brasilia, v.7, n.1/2, p.217, 1997. Trabalho apresentado no 10o. Congresso Brasileiro de Sementes, 1997. Resumo.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
|   |
| 8. | | DAVIDE, A. C.; MALAVASI, M. M.; OLIVEIRA, L. M.; MACHADO, C. F.; TONETTI, O. A. O. Uso do teste de tetrazolio para avaliar a qualidade de sementes de pau-santo (Kielmeyera coricea (Spr.) Mart.) - Guttiferae. Informativo ABRATES, Brasilia, v.7, n.1/2, p.219, 1997. Trabalho apresentado no 10o. Congresso Brasileiro de Sementes, 1997. Resumo.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| 9. | | MALAVASI, M. M.; DAVIDE, A. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. M.; TONETTI, O. A. O.; MACHADO, C. F.; CARVALHO, L. R. Avaliacao da viabilidade de sementes de pau-santo (Kielmeyera coriacea (Spr.) Mart. - Guttiferae), submetidas a diferentes niveis de dessecacao, atraves do teste de tetrazolio. Informativo ABRATES, Brasilia, v.7, n.1/2, p.216, 1997. Trabalho apresentado no 10o. Congresso Brasileiro de Sementes, 1997. Resumo.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| 10. | | BARIONI, L. G.; WOODWARD, S. J. R.; TEDESCHI, L. O.; MACHADO, C. F.; OLTJEN, J. W.; MARTHA JÚNIOR, G. B.; SAINZ, R. D. Current and potential contributions of mathematical modeling to management of grazing systems. In: GRASSLAND ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND GRAZING ECOLOGY, 2., 2004, Curitiba. [Anais...]. Curitiba: UFPR, 2004. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 11 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpms.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/09/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
FLAUSINO, B. F.; MACHADO, C. F. M.; SILVA, J. H. C.; RONCHI, C. P.; PIMENTEL, M. A. G.; GONTIJO, L. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
BRUNO F. FLAUSINO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; CAROLINA F. M. MACHADO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; JOSÉ HIAGO C. SILVA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; CLÁUDIO P. RONCHI, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MARCO AURELIO GUERRA PIMENTEL, CNPMS; LESSANDO M. GONTIJO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa. |
|
Título: |
Intercropping maize with brachiaria can be adouble-edged sword strategy. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pest Management Science, v. 78, p. 5243-5250, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
http://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7143 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
BACKGROUND: Intercropping is commonly implemented as a way of promoting sustainable agriculture. Some of the benefits of intercropping include improving resource-use efficiency and soil quality as well as promoting pest control. As for pest control, intercropping can often engender pest repellency/confusion and promote natural biological control. Nevertheless, intercropping is not always a win?win strategy for pest management, with chances of sometimes either favoring or hampering pests and their natural enemies. Brazilian farmers commonly row-intercrop maize with brachiaria with the intent of forming a grass pasture for the feeding of livestock after maize harvest. However, very little is known about whether this intercropping can influence key pests and natural enemies in the maize agroecosystem. The overall aim of this study was to investigate how multiple groups of maize pests and natural enemies respond in terms of temporal abundance to this intercropping. RESULTS: Defoliation caused by caterpillars was higher in the intercropping treatment. Intercropping appeared to promote Dalbulus maidis while hampering aphids and Diabrotica speciosa. In general, the abundance of natural enemies was favored by intercropping. There was a reduction in maize productivity (i.e. fresh weight) in the intercropping treatment. Most results were season dependent. CONCLUSION: We believe that by considering together the pros and cons of intercropping maize and brachiaria in terms of pest management and soil conservation/fertility, the benefits of implementing this intercropping shall still outweigh its potential challenges. Nevertheless, the results and ensuing recommendations should be considered under the context of time and arthropod species. MenosBACKGROUND: Intercropping is commonly implemented as a way of promoting sustainable agriculture. Some of the benefits of intercropping include improving resource-use efficiency and soil quality as well as promoting pest control. As for pest control, intercropping can often engender pest repellency/confusion and promote natural biological control. Nevertheless, intercropping is not always a win?win strategy for pest management, with chances of sometimes either favoring or hampering pests and their natural enemies. Brazilian farmers commonly row-intercrop maize with brachiaria with the intent of forming a grass pasture for the feeding of livestock after maize harvest. However, very little is known about whether this intercropping can influence key pests and natural enemies in the maize agroecosystem. The overall aim of this study was to investigate how multiple groups of maize pests and natural enemies respond in terms of temporal abundance to this intercropping. RESULTS: Defoliation caused by caterpillars was higher in the intercropping treatment. Intercropping appeared to promote Dalbulus maidis while hampering aphids and Diabrotica speciosa. In general, the abundance of natural enemies was favored by intercropping. There was a reduction in maize productivity (i.e. fresh weight) in the intercropping treatment. Most results were season dependent. CONCLUSION: We believe that by considering together the pros and cons of intercropping maize and brachiaria in terms of pest manage... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Milho; Praga de Planta. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Dalbulus maidis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02463naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2146980
005 2022-11-10
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7143$2DOI
100 1 $aFLAUSINO, B. F.
245 $aIntercropping maize with brachiaria can be adouble-edged sword strategy.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aBACKGROUND: Intercropping is commonly implemented as a way of promoting sustainable agriculture. Some of the benefits of intercropping include improving resource-use efficiency and soil quality as well as promoting pest control. As for pest control, intercropping can often engender pest repellency/confusion and promote natural biological control. Nevertheless, intercropping is not always a win?win strategy for pest management, with chances of sometimes either favoring or hampering pests and their natural enemies. Brazilian farmers commonly row-intercrop maize with brachiaria with the intent of forming a grass pasture for the feeding of livestock after maize harvest. However, very little is known about whether this intercropping can influence key pests and natural enemies in the maize agroecosystem. The overall aim of this study was to investigate how multiple groups of maize pests and natural enemies respond in terms of temporal abundance to this intercropping. RESULTS: Defoliation caused by caterpillars was higher in the intercropping treatment. Intercropping appeared to promote Dalbulus maidis while hampering aphids and Diabrotica speciosa. In general, the abundance of natural enemies was favored by intercropping. There was a reduction in maize productivity (i.e. fresh weight) in the intercropping treatment. Most results were season dependent. CONCLUSION: We believe that by considering together the pros and cons of intercropping maize and brachiaria in terms of pest management and soil conservation/fertility, the benefits of implementing this intercropping shall still outweigh its potential challenges. Nevertheless, the results and ensuing recommendations should be considered under the context of time and arthropod species.
650 $aDalbulus maidis
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aMilho
650 $aPraga de Planta
700 1 $aMACHADO, C. F. M.
700 1 $aSILVA, J. H. C.
700 1 $aRONCHI, C. P.
700 1 $aPIMENTEL, M. A. G.
700 1 $aGONTIJO, L. M.
773 $tPest Management Science$gv. 78, p. 5243-5250, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
