| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 429 | |
| 84. |  | LIMA, G. J. M. M. de; SOBESTIANSKY, J.; DALLA COSTA, O. A. Manejo da alimentacao de porcas em lactacao. In: SIMPOSIO DO COLEGIO BRASILEIRO DE NUTRICAO ANIMAL, 3., 1990, Campinas, SP. Anais... Campinas: CBNA, 1990. p.109-130 SEMINARIO SOBRE TECNOLOGIA DA PRODUCAO DE RACOES, 2., 1990, Campinas, SP.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|   |
| 85. | | VIOLA, E. S.; VIOLA, T. H.; LIMA, G. J. M. M. de; AVILA, V. S. de. Água na avicultura: importância, qualidade e exigências. In: PALHARES, J. C. P.; KUNZ, A. (Ed.). Manejo ambiental na avicultura, 2011. Concórdia: Embrapa Suínos e Aves, 2011. p. 35-124. (Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Documentos, 149).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|  |
| 89. | | NONES, K. LIMA, G. J. M. M. de, SCHMIDT, A. KLEIN, C. H. Avaliaçao bromatológica de híbridos comerciais de milho produzidos nos estados do Paraná e Santa Catarina, Brasil, na safra 1999/2000.\n In: CONGRESSO MERCOSUL DE PRODUÇAO SUINA, 2000, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Memória... Buenos Aires, 2000. p.NA10. Parceria: CNPq / FUNDAGRO.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| 98. | | LIMA, G. J. M. M. de; PAES, M. C. D.; QUEIROZ, V. A. V. O milho na nutrição animal e humana. In: CRUZ, J. C.; MAGALHAES, P. C.; PEREIRA FILHO, I. A.; MOREIRA, J. A. A. (Ed.). Milho: o produtor pergunta, a Embrapa responde. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Sete Lagoas: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, 2011. cap. 16, p. 239-267. (Coleção 500 perguntas, 500 respostas).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| 100. | | GORAGA, Z.; BEKELE, A.; DEGEFA, T.; ALWI, M.; MENGESHA, M.; LIMA, G. J. M. M. de. Live pigs marketing and buyers' characteristics in Ethiopia. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, v. 5, n. 4, p. 244-254, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 429 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/12/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MANZKE, N. E.; GOMES, B. K.; XAVIER, E. G.; LIMA, G. J. M. M. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
NAIANA EINHARDT MANZKE, UFPel; BRUNA KUHN GOMES, UFPel; EDUARDO GONÇALVES XAVIER, UFPel; GUSTAVO JULIO MELLO M DE LIMA, CNPSA. |
|
Título: |
Efficacy of energy supplementation on growth performance and immune response of suckling pigs. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Animal Science, v. 96, n.8, p. 4723-4730, 2018. |
|
DOI: |
10.1093/jas/sky335. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Three studies were performed to determine the effects of oral energy sources on the performance, immune status, and intestinal morphology of piglets. In Exp. 1, 50 litters were selected based on genotype and parity order to determine the optimum amount of supplemental energy for neonatal pigs. They were distributed according to a 5 × 5 Latin square design, in which columns were represented by 5 sows and rows were represented by 5 newborn weight categories. Treatments consisted of 2 oral doses of 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16 mL of rice bran oil (RBO). There was a positive response of RBO on BW with a numerical difference (P = 0.12) and a significant linear effect (P = 0.04) at weaning. In Exp. 2, litters (n = 340) were randomly allotted to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: RBO supplemented either through oral doses (without supplementation or with 2 mL of RBO) or through prestarter feed (without supplementation or with 2% of RBO replacing 2% of soybean oil). Piglets orally receiving RBO showed a numerical increase in BW at weaning (P = 0.101) compared with the control group. Moreover, piglets supplemented by prestarter feed tended to increase feed intake (P = 0.084). In Exp. 3, litters (n = 245) were selected based on genotype and parity order and they were distributed according to a 7 × 7 Latin square design planed in the same way as in Exp. 1. Each neonatal pig within a litter was randomly assigned to 1 of 7 treatments: 1) control (no supplementation), 2) 2 mL of RBO enriched with omega-3 fatty acids, 3) 2.33 mL of pure glycerin, 4) 1.3 mL of soybean oil, 5) 1.4 mL of linseed oil, 6) 1.68 mL of coconut oil, and 7) 2 mL of RBO. Animal performance was analyzed using 2 data sets: all data (average initial BW of 1.479 kg) and low birth weight (LBW) piglet data (?1.220 kg initial BW with average of 0.985 kg). Body weight or BW gain (BWG) were not different among treatments (P > 0.10) when all data were analyzed. However, LBW piglets fed coconut oil tended to increase BW (P = 0.099) during the first week. In conclusion, the oral use of RBO may increase BW at weaning and the supplementation by prestarter feed may enhance the feed intake of piglets. In addition, coconut oil may increase BW of LBW piglets in the first week of life without affecting mortality, immune response, or gut morphology. The routine practice of oral supplementation of energy for newborn pigs could be an important tool in swine production. MenosAbstract: Three studies were performed to determine the effects of oral energy sources on the performance, immune status, and intestinal morphology of piglets. In Exp. 1, 50 litters were selected based on genotype and parity order to determine the optimum amount of supplemental energy for neonatal pigs. They were distributed according to a 5 × 5 Latin square design, in which columns were represented by 5 sows and rows were represented by 5 newborn weight categories. Treatments consisted of 2 oral doses of 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16 mL of rice bran oil (RBO). There was a positive response of RBO on BW with a numerical difference (P = 0.12) and a significant linear effect (P = 0.04) at weaning. In Exp. 2, litters (n = 340) were randomly allotted to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: RBO supplemented either through oral doses (without supplementation or with 2 mL of RBO) or through prestarter feed (without supplementation or with 2% of RBO replacing 2% of soybean oil). Piglets orally receiving RBO showed a numerical increase in BW at weaning (P = 0.101) compared with the control group. Moreover, piglets supplemented by prestarter feed tended to increase feed intake (P = 0.084). In Exp. 3, litters (n = 245) were selected based on genotype and parity order and they were distributed according to a 7 × 7 Latin square design planed in the same way as in Exp. 1. Each neonatal pig within a litter was randomly assigned to 1 of 7 treatments: 1) control (no supplementation), 2) 2 mL of ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Leitão recém-nascido; Neonatal; Óleo de côco; Óleo de farelo de arroz; Óleo de linhaça; Óleo de soja. |
|
Thesagro: |
Dieta; Glicerina; Leitão; Nutrição Animal; Óleo Vegetal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Animal nutrition; Coconut oil; Linseed oil; Neonates; Piglet feeding; Rice bran oil; Soybean oil. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03537naa a2200385 a 4500
001 2100816
005 2018-12-05
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1093/jas/sky335.$2DOI
100 1 $aMANZKE, N. E.
245 $aEfficacy of energy supplementation on growth performance and immune response of suckling pigs.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aAbstract: Three studies were performed to determine the effects of oral energy sources on the performance, immune status, and intestinal morphology of piglets. In Exp. 1, 50 litters were selected based on genotype and parity order to determine the optimum amount of supplemental energy for neonatal pigs. They were distributed according to a 5 × 5 Latin square design, in which columns were represented by 5 sows and rows were represented by 5 newborn weight categories. Treatments consisted of 2 oral doses of 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16 mL of rice bran oil (RBO). There was a positive response of RBO on BW with a numerical difference (P = 0.12) and a significant linear effect (P = 0.04) at weaning. In Exp. 2, litters (n = 340) were randomly allotted to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: RBO supplemented either through oral doses (without supplementation or with 2 mL of RBO) or through prestarter feed (without supplementation or with 2% of RBO replacing 2% of soybean oil). Piglets orally receiving RBO showed a numerical increase in BW at weaning (P = 0.101) compared with the control group. Moreover, piglets supplemented by prestarter feed tended to increase feed intake (P = 0.084). In Exp. 3, litters (n = 245) were selected based on genotype and parity order and they were distributed according to a 7 × 7 Latin square design planed in the same way as in Exp. 1. Each neonatal pig within a litter was randomly assigned to 1 of 7 treatments: 1) control (no supplementation), 2) 2 mL of RBO enriched with omega-3 fatty acids, 3) 2.33 mL of pure glycerin, 4) 1.3 mL of soybean oil, 5) 1.4 mL of linseed oil, 6) 1.68 mL of coconut oil, and 7) 2 mL of RBO. Animal performance was analyzed using 2 data sets: all data (average initial BW of 1.479 kg) and low birth weight (LBW) piglet data (?1.220 kg initial BW with average of 0.985 kg). Body weight or BW gain (BWG) were not different among treatments (P > 0.10) when all data were analyzed. However, LBW piglets fed coconut oil tended to increase BW (P = 0.099) during the first week. In conclusion, the oral use of RBO may increase BW at weaning and the supplementation by prestarter feed may enhance the feed intake of piglets. In addition, coconut oil may increase BW of LBW piglets in the first week of life without affecting mortality, immune response, or gut morphology. The routine practice of oral supplementation of energy for newborn pigs could be an important tool in swine production.
650 $aAnimal nutrition
650 $aCoconut oil
650 $aLinseed oil
650 $aNeonates
650 $aPiglet feeding
650 $aRice bran oil
650 $aSoybean oil
650 $aDieta
650 $aGlicerina
650 $aLeitão
650 $aNutrição Animal
650 $aÓleo Vegetal
653 $aLeitão recém-nascido
653 $aNeonatal
653 $aÓleo de côco
653 $aÓleo de farelo de arroz
653 $aÓleo de linhaça
653 $aÓleo de soja
700 1 $aGOMES, B. K.
700 1 $aXAVIER, E. G.
700 1 $aLIMA, G. J. M. M. de
773 $tJournal of Animal Science$gv. 96, n.8, p. 4723-4730, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
