| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/01/2009 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/04/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
|
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, J. M. S.; FONTES, M. H. R.; PROCÓPIO, S. de O.; NASCIMENTO, M. A. A.; VIEIRA, S. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
Joana Maria Santos Ferreira, Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros; Humberto Rollemberg Fontes; Sérgio de Oliveira Procópio, Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros; Maria Aparecida Andrade Nascimento; Salete Dezen Vieira. |
|
Título: |
Resinose do coqueiro: como identificar essa doença. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Aracaju: Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros, 2008. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cocqueiro; Folder. |
|
Thesagro: |
Coco; Doença; Resinose. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CPATC-2009-09/20372/1/f_15_2008.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00564nam a2200205 a 4500
001 1372861
005 2018-04-30
008 2008 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aFERREIRA, J. M. S.
245 $aResinose do coqueiro$bcomo identificar essa doença.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aAracaju: Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros$c2008
650 $aCoco
650 $aDoença
650 $aResinose
653 $aCocqueiro
653 $aFolder
700 1 $aFONTES, M. H. R.
700 1 $aPROCÓPIO, S. de O.
700 1 $aNASCIMENTO, M. A. A.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, S. D.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros (CPATC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/01/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/02/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
REIS, A. F. de B.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; LAGO, B. C.; TRIVELIN, P. C.; LINQUIST, B.; FAVARIN, J. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANDRE FROES DE BORJA REIS, ESALQ; RODRIGO ESTEVAM MUNHOZ DE ALMEIDA, CNPASA; BRUNO COCCO LAGO, ESALQ; PAULO CESAR TRIVELIN, CENA; BRUCE LINQUIST, UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA, Davis-CA; JOSE LAERCIO FAVARIN, ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Aerobic rice system improves water productivity, nitrogen recovery and crop performance in Brazilian weathered lowland soil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Field Crops Research, v. 218, p. 59-68, 2018. |
|
ISSN: |
0378-4290 |
|
DOI: |
10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.002 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Worldwide, rice systems are faced with the challenge of producing higher yields with less water. Water savings practices such as aerobic system and alternate wetting and drying (AWD) are being evaluated in lowland rice systems. However, few studies have been conducted on this subject in tropical South America where soils are highly weathered. Thus, a three-year field experiment was conducted in Brazil on a lowland Plinthaquults to investigate crop performance, water input productivity (WPin) and N recovery under five irrigation regimes: continuous flooding (CF); AWD with short cycle (AWDS); AWD with long cycle (AWDL); saturated soil without ponded water (SS); and aerobic (AR). The drying events in AWDS occurred more frequently than in AWDL. The experimental design was a split-plot with irrigation regimes in the main plot and N fertilizer rate, 0 or 150 kg N ha-1, in the subplot. 15N micro-plots were set up to examine the fate of N fertilizer. The highest grain yields for 150N and 0N treatments resulted from the AR irrigation regime and averaged 9.1 and 6.5 mg ha-1, respectively. Yields among the others irrigations regimes varied from year to the next, but the average was 8.5 and 5.4 mg ha-1 in the 150N and 0N treatments, respectively. Higher yields are attributed to higher N uptake and greater N recovery in the AR treatment. Apparent N recovery averaged 58% in the AR treatment compared to 34% in the other treatments. Similarly, total recovery (plant and soil) of 15N in the AR treatment was 82%, compared to 62, 61, 56, 56% in SS, AWDS, AWDL, CF respectively. Higher N recovery in the AR was likely the result of lower N losses. Irrigation inputs ranged from 15mm in the AR to 1337mm in the CF treatment. The WPin (kg m-3) averaged 0.8 in AR, and 0.5, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.4 in SS, CF, AWDS, AWDL and CF. Thus, in this environment, rice productivity, water productivity, and N use efficiency were all enhanced in aerobic systems relative to continuous flooding or any alternative irrigation regime. MenosWorldwide, rice systems are faced with the challenge of producing higher yields with less water. Water savings practices such as aerobic system and alternate wetting and drying (AWD) are being evaluated in lowland rice systems. However, few studies have been conducted on this subject in tropical South America where soils are highly weathered. Thus, a three-year field experiment was conducted in Brazil on a lowland Plinthaquults to investigate crop performance, water input productivity (WPin) and N recovery under five irrigation regimes: continuous flooding (CF); AWD with short cycle (AWDS); AWD with long cycle (AWDL); saturated soil without ponded water (SS); and aerobic (AR). The drying events in AWDS occurred more frequently than in AWDL. The experimental design was a split-plot with irrigation regimes in the main plot and N fertilizer rate, 0 or 150 kg N ha-1, in the subplot. 15N micro-plots were set up to examine the fate of N fertilizer. The highest grain yields for 150N and 0N treatments resulted from the AR irrigation regime and averaged 9.1 and 6.5 mg ha-1, respectively. Yields among the others irrigations regimes varied from year to the next, but the average was 8.5 and 5.4 mg ha-1 in the 150N and 0N treatments, respectively. Higher yields are attributed to higher N uptake and greater N recovery in the AR treatment. Apparent N recovery averaged 58% in the AR treatment compared to 34% in the other treatments. Similarly, total recovery (plant and soil) of 15N in the A... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Isotopic recovery; Water saving. |
|
Thesagro: |
Arroz; Oryza sativa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Nutrient use efficiency; Rice; Ultisols. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02866naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2085049
005 2019-02-05
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0378-4290
024 7 $a10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.002$2DOI
100 1 $aREIS, A. F. de B.
245 $aAerobic rice system improves water productivity, nitrogen recovery and crop performance in Brazilian weathered lowland soil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aWorldwide, rice systems are faced with the challenge of producing higher yields with less water. Water savings practices such as aerobic system and alternate wetting and drying (AWD) are being evaluated in lowland rice systems. However, few studies have been conducted on this subject in tropical South America where soils are highly weathered. Thus, a three-year field experiment was conducted in Brazil on a lowland Plinthaquults to investigate crop performance, water input productivity (WPin) and N recovery under five irrigation regimes: continuous flooding (CF); AWD with short cycle (AWDS); AWD with long cycle (AWDL); saturated soil without ponded water (SS); and aerobic (AR). The drying events in AWDS occurred more frequently than in AWDL. The experimental design was a split-plot with irrigation regimes in the main plot and N fertilizer rate, 0 or 150 kg N ha-1, in the subplot. 15N micro-plots were set up to examine the fate of N fertilizer. The highest grain yields for 150N and 0N treatments resulted from the AR irrigation regime and averaged 9.1 and 6.5 mg ha-1, respectively. Yields among the others irrigations regimes varied from year to the next, but the average was 8.5 and 5.4 mg ha-1 in the 150N and 0N treatments, respectively. Higher yields are attributed to higher N uptake and greater N recovery in the AR treatment. Apparent N recovery averaged 58% in the AR treatment compared to 34% in the other treatments. Similarly, total recovery (plant and soil) of 15N in the AR treatment was 82%, compared to 62, 61, 56, 56% in SS, AWDS, AWDL, CF respectively. Higher N recovery in the AR was likely the result of lower N losses. Irrigation inputs ranged from 15mm in the AR to 1337mm in the CF treatment. The WPin (kg m-3) averaged 0.8 in AR, and 0.5, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.4 in SS, CF, AWDS, AWDL and CF. Thus, in this environment, rice productivity, water productivity, and N use efficiency were all enhanced in aerobic systems relative to continuous flooding or any alternative irrigation regime.
650 $aNutrient use efficiency
650 $aRice
650 $aUltisols
650 $aArroz
650 $aOryza sativa
653 $aIsotopic recovery
653 $aWater saving
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. E. M. de
700 1 $aLAGO, B. C.
700 1 $aTRIVELIN, P. C.
700 1 $aLINQUIST, B.
700 1 $aFAVARIN, J. L.
773 $tField Crops Research$gv. 218, p. 59-68, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
