| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/10/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
|
Autoria: |
EMBRAPA. |
|
Título: |
Portfólio de convivência com a seca no Semiárido. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
Np. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. color. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Na Embrapa, os projetos voltados para esta temática estão agrupados no portfólio de Convivência com a Seca no Semiárido. Por meio deles são desenvolvidas pesquisas sobre a conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade da Caatinga, avaliação de cultivares tolerantes à seca, sistemas de integração caipiras, barragens subterrâneas, reuso de água, forrageiras para alimentação animal, uso dos solos, entre outros. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Convivência com a seca; Convivência com a Seca no Semiárido; Semiárido. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura de Subsistência; Agricultura Sustentável; Biodiversidade; Caatinga; Política de Pesquisa; Programa de Pesquisa; Seca; Vegetação Nativa. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biodiversity; Drought; Drought tolerance; Research and development; Research policy; Research programs; Semiarid zones. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/259111/1/Encarte-Convivencia-com-a-Seca.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01374nam a2200337 a 4500
001 2147868
005 2023-12-05
008 2022 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aEMBRAPA.
245 $aPortfólio de convivência com a seca no Semiárido.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aBrasília, DF$c2022
300 $aNp.$cil. color.
520 $aNa Embrapa, os projetos voltados para esta temática estão agrupados no portfólio de Convivência com a Seca no Semiárido. Por meio deles são desenvolvidas pesquisas sobre a conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade da Caatinga, avaliação de cultivares tolerantes à seca, sistemas de integração caipiras, barragens subterrâneas, reuso de água, forrageiras para alimentação animal, uso dos solos, entre outros.
650 $aBiodiversity
650 $aDrought
650 $aDrought tolerance
650 $aResearch and development
650 $aResearch policy
650 $aResearch programs
650 $aSemiarid zones
650 $aAgricultura de Subsistência
650 $aAgricultura Sustentável
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aCaatinga
650 $aPolítica de Pesquisa
650 $aPrograma de Pesquisa
650 $aSeca
650 $aVegetação Nativa
653 $aConvivência com a seca
653 $aConvivência com a Seca no Semiárido
653 $aSemiárido
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/01/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/11/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
Internacional - A |
|
Autoria: |
SIEGMUND-SCHULTZE, M.; RISCHKOWSKY, B.; VEIGA, J. B. da; KING, J. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
M. Siegmund-Schultze, University of Gottingen; B. Rischkowsky, University of Gottingen; Jonas Bastos da Veiga, CPATU; J. M. King, University of Gottingen. |
|
Título: |
Cattle are cash generating assets for mixed smallholder farms in the Eastern Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural Systems, v. 94, n.3, p.738-749, 2007. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.03.005 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Disponível também on-line. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The presence of cattle in the Amazon region is controversial in terms of their ecological suitability and profitability compared with crops. Nevertheless, they are widely distributed in the study area in north-eastern Pará and, contrary to the common image of cattle on large ranches, a high proportion of them are kept on smallholder farms. To explain their presence, cattle are assumed to have benefits beyond physical production, such as complementing resource use or representing capital. To test this hypothesis, the costs and benefits of the three main agricultural activities, cattle, cassava and black pepper production, in terms of land, labour and capital productivity, were recorded in 37 small farms over a period of 15 months. To provide a longer perspective, benefits and costs of these activities were calculated for their assumed lifetime, which in the case of cattle, assumed a stable herd, derived from a deterministic herd model. The resultant values for land, labour and capital productivity of cattle were much lower than the values derived from direct observations during the study period, and were not as high as those for cassava and black pepper. Furthermore, the analysis of resource use in the farms showed that cattle production was not usually integrated with cropping activities, did not improve the use of available labour, and competed for land. Therefore, there had to be a reason for keeping cattle beyond their physical productivity. It was deduced to be their functional quality. Cattle could be disposed of quickly and easily at any time, in order to acquire large sums of cash or the equivalent in kind. The liquidity derived from keeping living stock was not matched by other agricultural activities or by the financial market. Hence, cattle turned out to be the best instrument of finance for the smallholder. Farmers were not interested in the continuous development of their herds, or sustainable production practices, and favoured low input management. Consequently, development plans relying on long-term, continuous commitments to pasture and cattle management are inappropriate. Instead, research and extension work should focus on simple, flexible and low-cost improvements to cattle keeping on crop-livestock smallholder farms, until credit programmes are available that replace the financing function of cattle. MenosThe presence of cattle in the Amazon region is controversial in terms of their ecological suitability and profitability compared with crops. Nevertheless, they are widely distributed in the study area in north-eastern Pará and, contrary to the common image of cattle on large ranches, a high proportion of them are kept on smallholder farms. To explain their presence, cattle are assumed to have benefits beyond physical production, such as complementing resource use or representing capital. To test this hypothesis, the costs and benefits of the three main agricultural activities, cattle, cassava and black pepper production, in terms of land, labour and capital productivity, were recorded in 37 small farms over a period of 15 months. To provide a longer perspective, benefits and costs of these activities were calculated for their assumed lifetime, which in the case of cattle, assumed a stable herd, derived from a deterministic herd model. The resultant values for land, labour and capital productivity of cattle were much lower than the values derived from direct observations during the study period, and were not as high as those for cassava and black pepper. Furthermore, the analysis of resource use in the farms showed that cattle production was not usually integrated with cropping activities, did not improve the use of available labour, and competed for land. Therefore, there had to be a reason for keeping cattle beyond their physical productivity. It was deduced to be their fun... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; smallholder. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado; Pecuarista. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; cattle. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03100naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1409223
005 2022-11-23
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.03.005$2DOI
100 1 $aSIEGMUND-SCHULTZE, M.
245 $aCattle are cash generating assets for mixed smallholder farms in the Eastern Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2007
500 $aDisponível também on-line.
520 $aThe presence of cattle in the Amazon region is controversial in terms of their ecological suitability and profitability compared with crops. Nevertheless, they are widely distributed in the study area in north-eastern Pará and, contrary to the common image of cattle on large ranches, a high proportion of them are kept on smallholder farms. To explain their presence, cattle are assumed to have benefits beyond physical production, such as complementing resource use or representing capital. To test this hypothesis, the costs and benefits of the three main agricultural activities, cattle, cassava and black pepper production, in terms of land, labour and capital productivity, were recorded in 37 small farms over a period of 15 months. To provide a longer perspective, benefits and costs of these activities were calculated for their assumed lifetime, which in the case of cattle, assumed a stable herd, derived from a deterministic herd model. The resultant values for land, labour and capital productivity of cattle were much lower than the values derived from direct observations during the study period, and were not as high as those for cassava and black pepper. Furthermore, the analysis of resource use in the farms showed that cattle production was not usually integrated with cropping activities, did not improve the use of available labour, and competed for land. Therefore, there had to be a reason for keeping cattle beyond their physical productivity. It was deduced to be their functional quality. Cattle could be disposed of quickly and easily at any time, in order to acquire large sums of cash or the equivalent in kind. The liquidity derived from keeping living stock was not matched by other agricultural activities or by the financial market. Hence, cattle turned out to be the best instrument of finance for the smallholder. Farmers were not interested in the continuous development of their herds, or sustainable production practices, and favoured low input management. Consequently, development plans relying on long-term, continuous commitments to pasture and cattle management are inappropriate. Instead, research and extension work should focus on simple, flexible and low-cost improvements to cattle keeping on crop-livestock smallholder farms, until credit programmes are available that replace the financing function of cattle.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $acattle
650 $aGado
650 $aPecuarista
653 $aBrasil
653 $asmallholder
700 1 $aRISCHKOWSKY, B.
700 1 $aVEIGA, J. B. da
700 1 $aKING, J. M.
773 $tAgricultural Systems$gv. 94, n.3, p.738-749, 2007.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
