| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
| 2. |  | HALLERMAN, E.; BREDLAU, J.; CAMARGO, L. S. de A.; DAGLI, M. L. Z.; KAREMBU, M.; KOVICH, D.; MUIA, A. N.; MURRONE, M. L.; ROCHA‑SALAVARRIETA, P. J.; ROMERO‑ALDEMITA, R.; TIZARD, M.; WALTON, M.; WRAY‑CAHEN, D. Enabling regulatory policy globally will promote realization of the potential of animal biotechnology. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, v. 5, n. 1, article 25, 2024.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|    |
| 3. | | HALLERMAN, E. M.; BREDLAU, J. P.; CAMARGO, L. S. de A.; DAGLI, M. L. Z.; KAREMBU, M.; NGURE, G.; ROMERO-ALDEMITA, R.; ROCHA-SALAVARRIETA, P. J.; TIZARD, M.; WALTON, M.; WRAY-CAHEN, D. Towards progressive regulatory approaches for agricultural applications of animal biotechnology. Transgenic Research, v. 31, n. 2, p. 167-199, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/10/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/02/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
CAPALBO, D. M. F.; KAREMBU, M. G.; NGUTHI, F. N. |
|
Afiliação: |
DEISE MARIA FONTANA CAPALBO, CNPMA; M. G. KAREMBU; F. N. NGUTH. |
|
Título: |
Communication and public perception of GM crops: the experiences of South-South LA projects shaping a communication strategy. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS, 14., 2017, Guadalajara. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms: past, present and future: book of abstracts...Guadalajara: ISBR, 2017. Ref. PO II-34. p. 219. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Communicating agricultural biotechnology and biosafety issues encompasses a spectrum of issues from the factual dissemination of scientific research to societal values and beliefs. This affirms the need for deliberate strategies for biotechnology and biosafety communication to ensure consistency in messaging for the varied stakeholders. Despite remarkable progress in commercialization of GM crops in an increasing number of countries, their adoption in Africa and some Latin-American (LAC) countries remains extremely low. In Brazil, illegal introduction of GM soybeans in 2000 was an experience that has shown the importance of a solid and workable legal framework as well as a robust communication strategy. Nowadays Brazil is the second largest grower of GM crops in the world. A study developed between 2010-2012 in south-south (S-S) LAC partnership on environmental risk assessment (ERA), public perception and communication (1), demonstrated the importance of developing a communication strategic plan that would promote public awareness and stimulate a well-informed public debate on biosafety (2). Based on these achievements a similar S-S project was developed between Brazil, Kenya and Uganda (2014-2016) to share Brazil?s experiences in using the communication strategic plan and science-based information to safely advance with GM crops. This was expected to enable the two African countries to make decisions on GM crops in accordance with their own values and needs without repeating Brazil?s mistakes (3). Much advancement was achieved with this initiative. One of the key lessons learned is the fact that interest groups are similar in all the countries but the power structure differs among the groups. It is therefore important to define a clear communication strategy to ensure delivery of messages that inform the decision-making process on GM crops. MenosCommunicating agricultural biotechnology and biosafety issues encompasses a spectrum of issues from the factual dissemination of scientific research to societal values and beliefs. This affirms the need for deliberate strategies for biotechnology and biosafety communication to ensure consistency in messaging for the varied stakeholders. Despite remarkable progress in commercialization of GM crops in an increasing number of countries, their adoption in Africa and some Latin-American (LAC) countries remains extremely low. In Brazil, illegal introduction of GM soybeans in 2000 was an experience that has shown the importance of a solid and workable legal framework as well as a robust communication strategy. Nowadays Brazil is the second largest grower of GM crops in the world. A study developed between 2010-2012 in south-south (S-S) LAC partnership on environmental risk assessment (ERA), public perception and communication (1), demonstrated the importance of developing a communication strategic plan that would promote public awareness and stimulate a well-informed public debate on biosafety (2). Based on these achievements a similar S-S project was developed between Brazil, Kenya and Uganda (2014-2016) to share Brazil?s experiences in using the communication strategic plan and science-based information to safely advance with GM crops. This was expected to enable the two African countries to make decisions on GM crops in accordance with their own values and needs without repeatin... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
OGM. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/165489/1/RA-CapalboDMF-14ISBGMO-2017-p219.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02577nam a2200145 a 4500
001 2078067
005 2018-02-08
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCAPALBO, D. M. F.
245 $aCommunication and public perception of GM crops$bthe experiences of South-South LA projects shaping a communication strategy.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS, 14., 2017, Guadalajara. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms: past, present and future: book of abstracts...Guadalajara: ISBR, 2017. Ref. PO II-34. p. 219.$c2017
520 $aCommunicating agricultural biotechnology and biosafety issues encompasses a spectrum of issues from the factual dissemination of scientific research to societal values and beliefs. This affirms the need for deliberate strategies for biotechnology and biosafety communication to ensure consistency in messaging for the varied stakeholders. Despite remarkable progress in commercialization of GM crops in an increasing number of countries, their adoption in Africa and some Latin-American (LAC) countries remains extremely low. In Brazil, illegal introduction of GM soybeans in 2000 was an experience that has shown the importance of a solid and workable legal framework as well as a robust communication strategy. Nowadays Brazil is the second largest grower of GM crops in the world. A study developed between 2010-2012 in south-south (S-S) LAC partnership on environmental risk assessment (ERA), public perception and communication (1), demonstrated the importance of developing a communication strategic plan that would promote public awareness and stimulate a well-informed public debate on biosafety (2). Based on these achievements a similar S-S project was developed between Brazil, Kenya and Uganda (2014-2016) to share Brazil?s experiences in using the communication strategic plan and science-based information to safely advance with GM crops. This was expected to enable the two African countries to make decisions on GM crops in accordance with their own values and needs without repeating Brazil?s mistakes (3). Much advancement was achieved with this initiative. One of the key lessons learned is the fact that interest groups are similar in all the countries but the power structure differs among the groups. It is therefore important to define a clear communication strategy to ensure delivery of messages that inform the decision-making process on GM crops.
653 $aOGM
700 1 $aKAREMBU, M. G.
700 1 $aNGUTHI, F. N.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
