|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
Data corrente: |
16/11/2018 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/02/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
NGOLO, A. O.; MOREIRA, S. L. S.; OLIVEIRA, M. F. de; ROCHA, G. C.; ASSIS, I. R. de; FERNANDES, R. B. A. |
Afiliação: |
Aristides Osvaldo Ngolo, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Raphael Bragança Alves Fernandes; MAURILIO FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMS; Genelício Crusoé Rocha, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Igor Rodrigues de Assis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Raphael Bragança Alves Fernandes, Universidade Federal de Viçosa. |
Título: |
Glomalin-related soil protein after two decades of different tropical soil management. |
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONGRESS OF SOIL SCIENCE, 21., 2018, Rio de Janeiro. Soil science: beyond food and fuel: abstracts. Viçosa, MG: SBCS, 2018. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Palavras-Chave: |
Qualidade do solo. |
Thesagro: |
Fungo; Manejo do Solo; Micorriza. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/186180/1/Glomalin-related.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00706nam a2200205 a 4500 001 2099470 005 2019-02-12 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aNGOLO, A. O. 245 $aGlomalin-related soil protein after two decades of different tropical soil management.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: WORLD CONGRESS OF SOIL SCIENCE, 21., 2018, Rio de Janeiro. Soil science: beyond food and fuel: abstracts. Viçosa, MG: SBCS$c2018 650 $aFungo 650 $aManejo do Solo 650 $aMicorriza 653 $aQualidade do solo 700 1 $aMOREIRA, S. L. S. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. F. de 700 1 $aROCHA, G. C. 700 1 $aASSIS, I. R. de 700 1 $aFERNANDES, R. B. A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Solos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnps.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
16/12/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
11/11/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
CHALK, P. M.; INACIO, C. de T.; CHEN, D. |
Afiliação: |
PHILLIP MICHAEL CHALK, UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE; CAIO DE TEVES INACIO, CNPS; DELI CHEN, UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE. |
Título: |
Tracing the dynamics of animal excreta N in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum using 15N enrichment. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Advances in Agronomy, v. 160, n. 1, p. 187-247, 2020. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.10.004 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The increased demand for organic farm products, and the attendant restrictions on the use of synthetic N fertilizers in both traditional and organic agriculture, has focused attention on the efficacy of organic sources of N, including animal excreta. However, questions arise in regard to the agronomic and environmental benefits of excreta as alternative sources of N. These questions are best addressed through the experimental use of 15N-enriched excreta, which enable the labeled source to be unequivocally traced through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, which N difference or N equivalence techniques cannot achieve. In contrast to organic and inorganic N compounds that can be purchased commercially with a specified 15N label on the component N moieties, 15N-enriched excreta must be prepared by the investigator. The methods of production and the uniformity of labeling of the components of 15N-enriched excreta (feces, urine) and their admixture (slurry), the N use efficiencies of excreta in crop production, and comparisons and interactions of excreta with synthetic N sources are reviewed. Losses of N from excreta-amended soils to the environment and the residual N value of excreta in crop sequences are also examined. It was concluded that while similar agronomic and environmental issues surround the use of both synthetic fertilizers and excreta as sources of N for plant nutrition, the processes differ in intensity and duration both spatially and temporally. |
Thesagro: |
Amônia; Excremento; Fertilizante; Fezes; Lixiviação; Nitrogênio; Urina. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Ammonia; Excreta; Feces; Fertilizers; Leaching; Nitrogen; Nitrous oxide; Urine. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 02386naa a2200337 a 4500 001 2116926 005 2021-11-11 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.10.004$2DOI 100 1 $aCHALK, P. M. 245 $aTracing the dynamics of animal excreta N in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum using 15N enrichment.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aThe increased demand for organic farm products, and the attendant restrictions on the use of synthetic N fertilizers in both traditional and organic agriculture, has focused attention on the efficacy of organic sources of N, including animal excreta. However, questions arise in regard to the agronomic and environmental benefits of excreta as alternative sources of N. These questions are best addressed through the experimental use of 15N-enriched excreta, which enable the labeled source to be unequivocally traced through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, which N difference or N equivalence techniques cannot achieve. In contrast to organic and inorganic N compounds that can be purchased commercially with a specified 15N label on the component N moieties, 15N-enriched excreta must be prepared by the investigator. The methods of production and the uniformity of labeling of the components of 15N-enriched excreta (feces, urine) and their admixture (slurry), the N use efficiencies of excreta in crop production, and comparisons and interactions of excreta with synthetic N sources are reviewed. Losses of N from excreta-amended soils to the environment and the residual N value of excreta in crop sequences are also examined. It was concluded that while similar agronomic and environmental issues surround the use of both synthetic fertilizers and excreta as sources of N for plant nutrition, the processes differ in intensity and duration both spatially and temporally. 650 $aAmmonia 650 $aExcreta 650 $aFeces 650 $aFertilizers 650 $aLeaching 650 $aNitrogen 650 $aNitrous oxide 650 $aUrine 650 $aAmônia 650 $aExcremento 650 $aFertilizante 650 $aFezes 650 $aLixiviação 650 $aNitrogênio 650 $aUrina 700 1 $aINACIO, C. de T. 700 1 $aCHEN, D. 773 $tAdvances in Agronomy$gv. 160, n. 1, p. 187-247, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|