| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 155 | |
| 101. |  | FERNANDES, A. P. D.; GUIMARÃES, P. P.; BRAZ, E. M.; HOEFLICH, V. A.; ARCE, J. E. Alternativas de planejamento para a exploração florestal. Floresta, Curitiba, v. 43, n. 3, p. 339-350, jul./set. 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| 118. | | HOEFLICH, V. A.; MEDRADO, M, J S.; ALVES, M. V. G.; KOEHLER, H. S. The Brazilian forest sector: challenges and strategies for its development. In: IUFRO World Congress, 22., 2005, Brisbane. Forests in the balance: linking tradition and technology: program & abstracts. [Vienna]: IUFRO, 2005. 1 CD-ROM. Também publicado no The International Forestry Review, Oxford, v. 7, n. 5, p.112, Aug. 2005. Resumo.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 155 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/11/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/11/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 3 |
|
Autoria: |
RIBASKI, S. A. G.; HOEFLICH, V. A.; RIBASKI, J.; RIBASKI, N. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
Sonia Aparecida Guetten Ribaski, BRFOR Soluções Florestais; Vitor A. Hoeflich, UFPR; JORGE RIBASKI, CNPF; Nayara Guetten Ribaski, PUC-PR. |
|
Título: |
Silvopastoral systems as a support for sustainable development in the southwestern region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento, Curitiba, v. 7, n. 4, p. 516-532, set./dez. 2018. |
|
DOI: |
10.3895/rbpd.v7n4.8635 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
An economic viability analysis was performed for different eucalypt wood production systems (Eucalyptus grandisHill ex. Maiden) in two rural properties located in Alegrete municipality, RS. The traditional pasture system was compared with two other alternative systems, one of them represented by a pasture land converted to homogeneous eucalypt plantation by using two plant densities (2,222 and 1,111 trees.ha-1) and the other represented by a silvopastoral system with 1000 and 500 trees.ha-1. The results were analyzed by determining the Internal Return Rate (IRR) and comparing to the Minimum Attractive Rate (MAR). The alternatives with and without land value were evaluated taking into account the wood price variation (increase and reduction of 5%) and the wood volume (increase and reduction of 10%). Considering land value, all the alternatives showed IRR lower than MAR (3.72%). The sensibility analysis showed that when price and volume yield of wood increased, most of the alternatives which use thinning presented IRR higher than MAR, except the silvopastoral system at plantation density of 500 trees.ha-1. In conclusion, the implementation of the forest component is economically viable when land value is not considered. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroforestry system; Economic evaluation; Extensive cattle raising; Sistema agroflorestal. |
|
Thesagro: |
Eucalyptus Grandis; Pecuária; Produção Florestal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Cattle. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/186858/1/2018-J.Ribaski-RBPD-Silvopastoral.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02130naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2099935
005 2018-11-23
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3895/rbpd.v7n4.8635$2DOI
100 1 $aRIBASKI, S. A. G.
245 $aSilvopastoral systems as a support for sustainable development in the southwestern region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aAn economic viability analysis was performed for different eucalypt wood production systems (Eucalyptus grandisHill ex. Maiden) in two rural properties located in Alegrete municipality, RS. The traditional pasture system was compared with two other alternative systems, one of them represented by a pasture land converted to homogeneous eucalypt plantation by using two plant densities (2,222 and 1,111 trees.ha-1) and the other represented by a silvopastoral system with 1000 and 500 trees.ha-1. The results were analyzed by determining the Internal Return Rate (IRR) and comparing to the Minimum Attractive Rate (MAR). The alternatives with and without land value were evaluated taking into account the wood price variation (increase and reduction of 5%) and the wood volume (increase and reduction of 10%). Considering land value, all the alternatives showed IRR lower than MAR (3.72%). The sensibility analysis showed that when price and volume yield of wood increased, most of the alternatives which use thinning presented IRR higher than MAR, except the silvopastoral system at plantation density of 500 trees.ha-1. In conclusion, the implementation of the forest component is economically viable when land value is not considered.
650 $aCattle
650 $aEucalyptus Grandis
650 $aPecuária
650 $aProdução Florestal
653 $aAgroforestry system
653 $aEconomic evaluation
653 $aExtensive cattle raising
653 $aSistema agroflorestal
700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V. A.
700 1 $aRIBASKI, J.
700 1 $aRIBASKI, N. G.
773 $tRevista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento, Curitiba$gv. 7, n. 4, p. 516-532, set./dez. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
