| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/06/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/08/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
FONSECA, J. F. da; OLIVEIRA, M. E. F.; BRANDÃO, F. Z.; BATISTA, R. I. T. P.; GARCIA, A. R.; BARTLEWSKIE, P. M.; SOUZA-FABJAN, J. M. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
JEFERSON FERREIRA DA FONSECA, CNPC; MARIA EMILIA FRANCO OLIVEIRA, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) - Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil; FELIPE ZANDONADI BRANDÃO, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; RIBRIO I. T. P. BATISTA, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; ALEXANDRE ROSSETTO GARCIA, CPPSE; PAWEL M. BARTLEWSKIE, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph - Canada; JOANNA M. G. SOUZA-FABJAN, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil. |
|
Título: |
Non-surgical embryo transfer in goats and sheep: the Brazilian experience. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Reproduction Fertility and Development, v. 31, n. 1 p. 17-26, Dec. 2019. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1071/RD18324 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Brazil has presented tremendous progress in non-surgical embryo transfer (NSET) in sheep and goats. New instruments and techniques for non-surgical embryo recovery (NSER) and NSET in small ruminants were implemented. Recent improvements include refinement of the protocols for cervical relaxation combining oestradiol?oxytocin? cloprostenol treatment at specific times before NSER in sheep; recipient goats do not require any hormonal drugs to induce cervical dilation and direct embryo transfer by the cervical route yields excellent results. Transrectal ovarian ultrasonography (B-mode but especially colour Doppler) have proven to be accurate methods to localise and enumerate corpora lutea and luteinised unovulated follicles in recipient and donor does and ewes. An array of new criteria for selecting superior animals for NSER and NSET (e.g. cervical mapping) have been developed by Brazilian researchers. Extensive studies on both technologies were initially conducted in commercial breeds of goats and sheep but have been gradually extended to some native breeds of sheep (germplasm conservation) and dairy goat operations. It is speculated that, in future, NSER and NSET may become methods of choice for caprine and ovine embryo recovery and transfer in Brazil, and then globally. Due primarily to the efficiency of NSET in goats, a novel interspecies (e.g. bovine) IVP method may soon be developed on a large scale. The Brazilian experience is an invaluable source of information and know-how promoting the replacement of conventional surgical assisted reproductive technologies with non-surgical procedures and hence supporting the rapid development of the embryo transfer industry in small ruminants. MenosAbstract: Brazil has presented tremendous progress in non-surgical embryo transfer (NSET) in sheep and goats. New instruments and techniques for non-surgical embryo recovery (NSER) and NSET in small ruminants were implemented. Recent improvements include refinement of the protocols for cervical relaxation combining oestradiol?oxytocin? cloprostenol treatment at specific times before NSER in sheep; recipient goats do not require any hormonal drugs to induce cervical dilation and direct embryo transfer by the cervical route yields excellent results. Transrectal ovarian ultrasonography (B-mode but especially colour Doppler) have proven to be accurate methods to localise and enumerate corpora lutea and luteinised unovulated follicles in recipient and donor does and ewes. An array of new criteria for selecting superior animals for NSER and NSET (e.g. cervical mapping) have been developed by Brazilian researchers. Extensive studies on both technologies were initially conducted in commercial breeds of goats and sheep but have been gradually extended to some native breeds of sheep (germplasm conservation) and dairy goat operations. It is speculated that, in future, NSER and NSET may become methods of choice for caprine and ovine embryo recovery and transfer in Brazil, and then globally. Due primarily to the efficiency of NSET in goats, a novel interspecies (e.g. bovine) IVP method may soon be developed on a large scale. The Brazilian experience is an invaluable source of information... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cervical dilation; Cervical route; In vivo embryo production; MOET; Multiple ovulation; Transcervical embryo collection. |
|
Thesagro: |
Caprino; Ovino; Reprodução Animal; Transferência de Embrião. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Animal reproduction; Brazil; Dairy goats; Embryo transfer; Ewes; Small ruminants. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02888naa a2200397 a 4500
001 2110051
005 2021-08-10
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1071/RD18324$2DOI
100 1 $aFONSECA, J. F. da
245 $aNon-surgical embryo transfer in goats and sheep$bthe Brazilian experience.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aAbstract: Brazil has presented tremendous progress in non-surgical embryo transfer (NSET) in sheep and goats. New instruments and techniques for non-surgical embryo recovery (NSER) and NSET in small ruminants were implemented. Recent improvements include refinement of the protocols for cervical relaxation combining oestradiol?oxytocin? cloprostenol treatment at specific times before NSER in sheep; recipient goats do not require any hormonal drugs to induce cervical dilation and direct embryo transfer by the cervical route yields excellent results. Transrectal ovarian ultrasonography (B-mode but especially colour Doppler) have proven to be accurate methods to localise and enumerate corpora lutea and luteinised unovulated follicles in recipient and donor does and ewes. An array of new criteria for selecting superior animals for NSER and NSET (e.g. cervical mapping) have been developed by Brazilian researchers. Extensive studies on both technologies were initially conducted in commercial breeds of goats and sheep but have been gradually extended to some native breeds of sheep (germplasm conservation) and dairy goat operations. It is speculated that, in future, NSER and NSET may become methods of choice for caprine and ovine embryo recovery and transfer in Brazil, and then globally. Due primarily to the efficiency of NSET in goats, a novel interspecies (e.g. bovine) IVP method may soon be developed on a large scale. The Brazilian experience is an invaluable source of information and know-how promoting the replacement of conventional surgical assisted reproductive technologies with non-surgical procedures and hence supporting the rapid development of the embryo transfer industry in small ruminants.
650 $aAnimal reproduction
650 $aBrazil
650 $aDairy goats
650 $aEmbryo transfer
650 $aEwes
650 $aSmall ruminants
650 $aCaprino
650 $aOvino
650 $aReprodução Animal
650 $aTransferência de Embrião
653 $aCervical dilation
653 $aCervical route
653 $aIn vivo embryo production
653 $aMOET
653 $aMultiple ovulation
653 $aTranscervical embryo collection
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. E. F.
700 1 $aBRANDÃO, F. Z.
700 1 $aBATISTA, R. I. T. P.
700 1 $aGARCIA, A. R.
700 1 $aBARTLEWSKIE, P. M.
700 1 $aSOUZA-FABJAN, J. M. G.
773 $tReproduction Fertility and Development$gv. 31, n. 1 p. 17-26, Dec. 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Clima Temperado. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpact.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/10/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/10/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
AGOSTINETTO, D.; SOUZA, E. A.; ANDRES, A.; ULGUIM A. R.; SCHIMITZ, M. F.; GOULART, F. A. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
DIRCEU AGOSTINETTO; EDNA A. SOUZA; ANDRE ANDRES, CPACT; ANDRÉ R. ULGUIM; MAICON F. SCHIMITZ; FRANCISCO A.P. GOULART. |
|
Título: |
Period prior to interference of barnyardgrass is modified due to the spraying of cyhalofop-butyl alone or associated with penoxsulam in paddy rice crop. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Advances in Weed Science, V. 39, p. 1-6, 2021. |
|
ISSN: |
2675-9462 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2021;39:00001 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Weed occurrence is one of the main obstacles to the expression of the production potential of crops. Competition for one or more limiting environmental resources (CO2, water, light, and nutrients) can generate irreversible losses to crops, and there may be no recovery of their development even after the removal of the stress caused by weeds or inclusion of limiting resources to the environment (Karimmojeni et al., 2014). The average losses in rice yield due to the coexistence with weeds are estimated between 40 and 60%, reaching up to 96% in cases of lack of control (Chauhan and Johnson, 2011). The degree of weed interference is determined according to the species, density, location, availability of resources, and emergence period relative to the crop (Datta et al., 2017). However, the losses caused to the crop can be altered as the period in which the weed community coexists with the crop changes. Crop and weeds can live together at the beginning of development for a certain period without causing quantitative or qualitative losses to the crop (Silva et al., 2014). This stage, called the period prior to interference (PPI), corresponds to the period after emergence or sowing in which the crop can coexist with the weed community without negatively affecting yield or other characteristics (Silva et al., 2014). However, control measures must be adopted at the end of this period so that crop yield is not compromised (Silva and Durigan, 2006). Studies of competition periods conducted with the rice crop have shown that PPI duration can vary from 7 to 26 DAE (Silva and Durigan, 2006; Zhang et al., 2003). Variations in topography, climate, crop genetics, and management practices affect weed composition, weed density, and emergence time relative to the crop and, consequently, affect PPI (Korres and Norsworthy, 2015). This variability needs to be understood for the better use of the integrated weed management of each environment. Among the weed species in rice fields, barnyardgrass (Echinochloa spp.) stands out relative to the others due to its highly competitive ability compared to the crop (Agostinetto et al., 2008). The importance of this weed is due to its morphophysiological similarities with rice plants, denoting the potential for yield losses because of competition, as well as high infestation levels and a wide distribution in commercial crops (Andres et al., 2007). MenosWeed occurrence is one of the main obstacles to the expression of the production potential of crops. Competition for one or more limiting environmental resources (CO2, water, light, and nutrients) can generate irreversible losses to crops, and there may be no recovery of their development even after the removal of the stress caused by weeds or inclusion of limiting resources to the environment (Karimmojeni et al., 2014). The average losses in rice yield due to the coexistence with weeds are estimated between 40 and 60%, reaching up to 96% in cases of lack of control (Chauhan and Johnson, 2011). The degree of weed interference is determined according to the species, density, location, availability of resources, and emergence period relative to the crop (Datta et al., 2017). However, the losses caused to the crop can be altered as the period in which the weed community coexists with the crop changes. Crop and weeds can live together at the beginning of development for a certain period without causing quantitative or qualitative losses to the crop (Silva et al., 2014). This stage, called the period prior to interference (PPI), corresponds to the period after emergence or sowing in which the crop can coexist with the weed community without negatively affecting yield or other characteristics (Silva et al., 2014). However, control measures must be adopted at the end of this period so that crop yield is not compromised (Silva and Durigan, 2006). Studies of competition periods condu... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Weed competition is one of the main constraints to rice yield. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Genetic background. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03213naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2135704
005 2021-10-29
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2675-9462
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2021;39:00001$2DOI
100 1 $aAGOSTINETTO, D.
245 $aPeriod prior to interference of barnyardgrass is modified due to the spraying of cyhalofop-butyl alone or associated with penoxsulam in paddy rice crop.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aWeed occurrence is one of the main obstacles to the expression of the production potential of crops. Competition for one or more limiting environmental resources (CO2, water, light, and nutrients) can generate irreversible losses to crops, and there may be no recovery of their development even after the removal of the stress caused by weeds or inclusion of limiting resources to the environment (Karimmojeni et al., 2014). The average losses in rice yield due to the coexistence with weeds are estimated between 40 and 60%, reaching up to 96% in cases of lack of control (Chauhan and Johnson, 2011). The degree of weed interference is determined according to the species, density, location, availability of resources, and emergence period relative to the crop (Datta et al., 2017). However, the losses caused to the crop can be altered as the period in which the weed community coexists with the crop changes. Crop and weeds can live together at the beginning of development for a certain period without causing quantitative or qualitative losses to the crop (Silva et al., 2014). This stage, called the period prior to interference (PPI), corresponds to the period after emergence or sowing in which the crop can coexist with the weed community without negatively affecting yield or other characteristics (Silva et al., 2014). However, control measures must be adopted at the end of this period so that crop yield is not compromised (Silva and Durigan, 2006). Studies of competition periods conducted with the rice crop have shown that PPI duration can vary from 7 to 26 DAE (Silva and Durigan, 2006; Zhang et al., 2003). Variations in topography, climate, crop genetics, and management practices affect weed composition, weed density, and emergence time relative to the crop and, consequently, affect PPI (Korres and Norsworthy, 2015). This variability needs to be understood for the better use of the integrated weed management of each environment. Among the weed species in rice fields, barnyardgrass (Echinochloa spp.) stands out relative to the others due to its highly competitive ability compared to the crop (Agostinetto et al., 2008). The importance of this weed is due to its morphophysiological similarities with rice plants, denoting the potential for yield losses because of competition, as well as high infestation levels and a wide distribution in commercial crops (Andres et al., 2007).
650 $aGenetic background
653 $aWeed competition is one of the main constraints to rice yield
700 1 $aSOUZA, E. A.
700 1 $aANDRES, A.
700 1 $aULGUIM A. R.
700 1 $aSCHIMITZ, M. F.
700 1 $aGOULART, F. A. P.
773 $tAdvances in Weed Science, V. 39, p. 1-6, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
