| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/12/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/01/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
ANDRADE, T. S. de; ALBERTINI, T. Z.; BARIONI, L. G.; MEDEIROS, S. R. de; MILLEN, D. D.; SANTOS, A. C. R. dos; GOULART, R. S.; LANNA, D. P. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
THIAGO SÉRGIO DE ANDRADE, Esalq/USP; TIAGO ZANETT ALBERTINI, @Tech; LUIS GUSTAVO BARIONI, CNPTIA; SERGIO RAPOSO DE MEDEIROS, CPPSE; DANILO DOMINGUES MILLEN, Unesp; ANTÔNIO CARLOS RAMOS DOS SANTOS, Esalq/USP; RODRIGO SILVA GOULART, FZEA/USP; DANTE PAZZANESE DUARTE LANNA, Esalq/USP. |
|
Título: |
Perception of consultants, feedlot owners, and packers regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint in feedlots: a national survey in Brazil (Part I). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Canadian Journal of Animal Science, v. 100, n. 4, p. 745-758, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0219 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract. Little information exists regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint (OSE) for feedlot-finished cattle in Brazil. This study investigated the perceptions of Brazilian feeders regarding the optimal time for slaughter. A total of 52 interviews were conducted involving nutritionist-consultants (n=23), feedlot owners (n=21), and packer-owned feedlots (n=8). The results showed that 65% of the interviewees used weight and fat cover, both estimated visually, to determine the moment for slaughter. Identifying the ideal time for slaughter was considered a challenge for respondents, and 85% of them recognized that their current slaughter endpoint identification method needed improvements. Regarding decision support systems, 58% of respondents reported they would purchase a computer program to help identify OSE, and 73% would be interested in incorporating a prototype of such a system into their feedlots. Carcass dressing (38%) and price (25%) were the main factors driving the feeder´s choice of meatpacker, followed by carcass premiums (10%). Meat quality was found to be an irrelevant criterion for Brazilian meatpackers in awarding both premiums (5%) and deductions (3%). Slaughter endpoint is determined subjectively by the Brazilian feeders, based on a visual evaluation of both weight and fatness |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Carcass; Feedlot; Management. |
|
Thesagro: |
Carcaça; Confinamento; Gado; Gado de Corte. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Beef; Beef cattle; Cattle; Feedlots. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02363naa a2200349 a 4500
001 2128876
005 2021-01-11
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0219$2DOI
100 1 $aANDRADE, T. S. de
245 $aPerception of consultants, feedlot owners, and packers regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint in feedlots$ba national survey in Brazil (Part I).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aAbstract. Little information exists regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint (OSE) for feedlot-finished cattle in Brazil. This study investigated the perceptions of Brazilian feeders regarding the optimal time for slaughter. A total of 52 interviews were conducted involving nutritionist-consultants (n=23), feedlot owners (n=21), and packer-owned feedlots (n=8). The results showed that 65% of the interviewees used weight and fat cover, both estimated visually, to determine the moment for slaughter. Identifying the ideal time for slaughter was considered a challenge for respondents, and 85% of them recognized that their current slaughter endpoint identification method needed improvements. Regarding decision support systems, 58% of respondents reported they would purchase a computer program to help identify OSE, and 73% would be interested in incorporating a prototype of such a system into their feedlots. Carcass dressing (38%) and price (25%) were the main factors driving the feeder´s choice of meatpacker, followed by carcass premiums (10%). Meat quality was found to be an irrelevant criterion for Brazilian meatpackers in awarding both premiums (5%) and deductions (3%). Slaughter endpoint is determined subjectively by the Brazilian feeders, based on a visual evaluation of both weight and fatness
650 $aBeef
650 $aBeef cattle
650 $aCattle
650 $aFeedlots
650 $aCarcaça
650 $aConfinamento
650 $aGado
650 $aGado de Corte
653 $aCarcass
653 $aFeedlot
653 $aManagement
700 1 $aALBERTINI, T. Z.
700 1 $aBARIONI, L. G.
700 1 $aMEDEIROS, S. R. de
700 1 $aMILLEN, D. D.
700 1 $aSANTOS, A. C. R. dos
700 1 $aGOULART, R. S.
700 1 $aLANNA, D. P. D.
773 $tCanadian Journal of Animal Science$gv. 100, n. 4, p. 745-758, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 61 | |
| 61. |  | PALHARES, J. C. P.; VIANCELLI, A.; KUNZ, A.; SANCHES, A. C.; GAMEIRO, A. H.; BARADI, C. R. M.; AITA, C.; AMORIM, D. M.; MIOLA, E. C. C.; JESUS, F. L. F. de; MENDONÇA, F. C.; FONGARO, G.; BAZZO, H. L. S.; TREICHEL, H.; SCHIRMANN, J.; NASCIMENTO, J. G.; GATIBONI, L. C.; LANNA, M. C. da S.; MAGRI, M. E.; PAZ TIERI, M.; MORALES, R.; NICOLOSO, R. da S.; GONZATTO, R.; QUEIROZ, R. de; GIACOMINI, S. J.; PUJOL, S. B.; CHARLON, V. (ed.). Produção animal e recursos hídricos: tecnologias para manejo de resíduos e uso eficiente dos insumos. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2019. 210 p. E-book.| Tipo: Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste; Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 61 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
