|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
Data corrente: |
30/06/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/06/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
ROBERTS, A.; BOECKMAN, C. J.; MÜHL, M.; ROMEIS, J.; TEEM, J. L.; VALICENTE, F. H.; BROWN, J. K.; EDWARDS, M. G.; LEVINE, S. L.; MELNICK, R. L.; ROFRIGUES, T. B.; VÉLEZ, A. M.; ZHOU, X.; HELLMICH, R. L. |
Afiliação: |
Andrew Roberts, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; Chad J. Boeckman, Corteva Agriscience; Marina Mühl, Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca, Dirección de Biotecnología, Buenos Aires; Jörg Romeis, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich; John L. Teem, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; FERNANDO HERCOS VALICENTE, CNPMS; Judith K. Brown, School of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson; Martin G. Edwards, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne; Steven L. Levine, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO; Rachel L. Melnick, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; Thais B. Rodrigues, Greenlight Biosciences, Inc., Medford, MA; Ana M. Vélez, Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Xuguo Zhou, Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; Richard L. Hellmich, USDA, Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Ames. |
Título: |
Sublethal endpoints in non-target organism testing for insect-active GE crops. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, v. 8, article 556, 2020. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Historically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and status of sublethal endpoint testing in non-target organisms. MenosHistorically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Organismos não-alvo; Parâmetros subletais; Planta geneticamente modificada. |
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Inseto; Melhoramento Genético Vegetal; Planta Transgênica. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/214276/1/Sublethal-endpoints.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02669naa a2200373 a 4500 001 2123519 005 2020-06-30 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556$2DOI 100 1 $aROBERTS, A. 245 $aSublethal endpoints in non-target organism testing for insect-active GE crops.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aHistorically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and status of sublethal endpoint testing in non-target organisms. 650 $aControle Biológico 650 $aInseto 650 $aMelhoramento Genético Vegetal 650 $aPlanta Transgênica 653 $aOrganismos não-alvo 653 $aParâmetros subletais 653 $aPlanta geneticamente modificada 700 1 $aBOECKMAN, C. J. 700 1 $aMÜHL, M. 700 1 $aROMEIS, J. 700 1 $aTEEM, J. L. 700 1 $aVALICENTE, F. H. 700 1 $aBROWN, J. K. 700 1 $aEDWARDS, M. G. 700 1 $aLEVINE, S. L. 700 1 $aMELNICK, R. L. 700 1 $aROFRIGUES, T. B. 700 1 $aVÉLEZ, A. M. 700 1 $aZHOU, X. 700 1 $aHELLMICH, R. L. 773 $tFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology$gv. 8, article 556, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Trigo. |
Data corrente: |
22/09/1992 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/12/2018 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Circular Técnica |
Autoria: |
GASSEN, D. N. |
Afiliação: |
Dirceu Neri Gassen, EMBRAPA-CNPT. |
Título: |
Insetos associados à cultura do trigo no Brasil. |
Ano de publicação: |
1984 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Passo Fundo: EMBRAPA-CNPT, 1984. |
Páginas: |
39 p. |
Série: |
(EMBRAPA-CNPT. Circular Técnica, 3). |
ISSN: |
0100-8625 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Insetos rizofagos; Phytalus sanctipauli, Coró do trigo; Diloboderus abderus, Coró; Pantomorus sp., Gorgulho do solo; Conoderus scalaris, Larva arame; Insetos brocas; Brocas da coroa; Listronotus bonariensis, Broca da coroa do trigo; Diabrotica speciosa, Vaquinha; Brocas do colmo; Elasmopalpus lignosellus, Broca do colo; Diatraea sp., Broca da cana; Insetos filofagos; Lagartas; Spodoptera frugiperda, Lagarta militar; Pseudaletia adultera, P. sequax, Lagartas do trigo; Mocis latipes, Curuquere dos capinzais; Formigas; Atta spp., Saúva; Acromyrmex spp., Quem-quem; Insetos succivoros; Pulgões; Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominale, Pulgão da raiz, R. padi, Pulgão da aveia; R. maidis, Pulgão do milho; Schizaphis graminum, Pulgão verde dos cereais; Metopolophium dirhodum, Pulgão da folha; Sitobion avenae, Pulgão da espiga; Percevejos; Nezara viridula, Percevejo verde da soja; Thyanta perditor, Percevejo do trigo; Trips; Caliothrips phaseoli, Trips do feijão; Medidas gerais de controle. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Biology; Brasil; Damage; Danos; Insect; Insetos; Pest; Pragas. |
Thesagro: |
Biologia; Dano; Entomologia; Inseto; Praga; Praga de planta; Trigo. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil; Insects; Plant pests; wheat. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- O Insetos e Entomologia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/83975/1/CNPT-CIRCULAR-03-INSETOS-ASSOCIADOS-A-CULTURA-DO-TRIGO-NO-BRASIL-FL-13421-.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01834nam a2200373 a 4500 001 1846603 005 2018-12-12 008 1984 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 022 $a0100-8625 100 1 $aGASSEN, D. N. 245 $aInsetos associados à cultura do trigo no Brasil. 260 $aPasso Fundo: EMBRAPA-CNPT$c1984 300 $a39 p. 490 $a(EMBRAPA-CNPT. Circular Técnica, 3). 520 $aInsetos rizofagos; Phytalus sanctipauli, Coró do trigo; Diloboderus abderus, Coró; Pantomorus sp., Gorgulho do solo; Conoderus scalaris, Larva arame; Insetos brocas; Brocas da coroa; Listronotus bonariensis, Broca da coroa do trigo; Diabrotica speciosa, Vaquinha; Brocas do colmo; Elasmopalpus lignosellus, Broca do colo; Diatraea sp., Broca da cana; Insetos filofagos; Lagartas; Spodoptera frugiperda, Lagarta militar; Pseudaletia adultera, P. sequax, Lagartas do trigo; Mocis latipes, Curuquere dos capinzais; Formigas; Atta spp., Saúva; Acromyrmex spp., Quem-quem; Insetos succivoros; Pulgões; Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominale, Pulgão da raiz, R. padi, Pulgão da aveia; R. maidis, Pulgão do milho; Schizaphis graminum, Pulgão verde dos cereais; Metopolophium dirhodum, Pulgão da folha; Sitobion avenae, Pulgão da espiga; Percevejos; Nezara viridula, Percevejo verde da soja; Thyanta perditor, Percevejo do trigo; Trips; Caliothrips phaseoli, Trips do feijão; Medidas gerais de controle. 650 $aBrazil 650 $aInsects 650 $aPlant pests 650 $awheat 650 $aBiologia 650 $aDano 650 $aEntomologia 650 $aInseto 650 $aPraga 650 $aPraga de planta 650 $aTrigo 653 $aBiology 653 $aBrasil 653 $aDamage 653 $aDanos 653 $aInsect 653 $aInsetos 653 $aPest 653 $aPragas
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|