| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 214 | |
| 141. |  | MEISTER, N. C.; CARDOSO, A. da S.; ALARI, F. O.; LEMOS, N. L. S.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; MALHEIROS, E. B.; REIS, R. A.; RUGGIERI, A. C. Effect of pasture management on enteric methane emissions from goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 53, n. 1, article 94, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|    |
| 142. | | CONGIO, G. F. de S.; CHIAVEGATO, M. B.; BATALHA, C. D. A.; BERNDT, A.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; SILVA, S. C. da. Effect of grazing frequency on enteric methane emissions, output of milk constituents and milk yield. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu, PR. Proceedings... Foz do Iguaçu, PR: SBZ, 2017. p. 587.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|  |
| 143. | | CONGIO, G. F. S.; CHIAVEGATO, M. B.; BATALHA, C. D. A.; BERNDT, A.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; SILVA, S. C. da. Effect of grazing frequency on enteric methane emissions, output of milk constituents and milk yield. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu, PR. Proceedings... Foz do Iguaçu, PR: SBZ, 2017. p. 587.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 144. | | RODRIGUES, A. C. F.; MONERÓ, T. O.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; DONETTI, L. A. R.; QUEIROZ, J. F. de; ALMEIDA, E. A. de. Efeitos da associação de benzo(a)pireno e 17 B-estradiol nas enzimas de biotransformação em tilápias do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus). In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE AQUICULTURA E BIOLOGIA AQUÁTICA, 5., 2012, Palmas. Anais... Palmas: Sociedade Brasileira de Aquicultura e Biologia Aquática, 2012. RO 529.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 145. | | CASTELIANI, A. G. B.; KAVAMURA, V. N.; ZUCCHI, T. D.; SÁBER, M. L.; NASCIMENTO, R. dos S.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; TAKETANI, R. G.; MELO, I. S. de. UV-B resistant yeast inhabit the phyllosphere of strawberry. British Microbiology Research Journal, London, v. 4, n. 10, p. 1105-1117, 2014.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 146. | | HABIBE, T. C.; NASCIMENTO, A. S. do; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; OLIVEIRA, D. N. dos S.; LOPES, F. F.; VIANA, R. E.; MALAVASI, A. BITC: proteção natural dos frutos de mamoeiros contra o ataque das moscas-das-frutas. Bahia Agrícola, Salvador, v. 6, n. 3, p. 63-66, nov. 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 147. | | HABIBE, T. C.; NASCIMENTO, A. S. do; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; OLIVEIRA, D. N. dos S.; LOPES, F. F.; VIANA, R. E.; MALAVASI, A. BITC: proteção natural dos frutos de mamoeiros contra o ataque das moscas-das-frutas. Bahia Agrícola, Salvador, v. 6, n. 3, p. 63-66, nov. 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 148. | | VALENTE, A.; REIS, R. C.; SANTOS, S.; BARBEIRO, R.; MENEGUELLI, F.; OLIVEIRA, A.; TERESINHA, T.; LAGE, J.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; SERRA, J. Influence of difference source of the fat on animal performance and methane emission. Advances in animal biosciences, v. 4, n. 2, p. 542, 2013. Edição dos Proceedings of the 5th Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture Conference, 2013 June, Dublin.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 149. | | PEDREIRA, M. dos S.; BERCHELLI, T. T.; PRIMAVESI, O.; OLIVEIRA, S. G. de; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; LIMA, M. A. de. Influence of different supplements and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) cultivars on intake, digestible variables and methane production of dairy heifers under tropical conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production, Edinburgh, v. 6, 6 p., 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 150. | | BATISTA, E. R.; MARINHO-PRADO, J. S.; MINEIRO, J. L. C.; SATO, M. E.; LUIZ, A. J. B.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S. Increased atmospheric CO2 combined with local climatic variation affects phenolics and spider mite populations in coffee trees. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 93, n. 3, e20190696, 2021. p. 1-14.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 151. | | QUEIROZ, J. F. de; SAMPAIO, F. G.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; LOSEKANN, M. E.; SCORVO, C. M. D. F.; SCORVO FILHO, J. D.; RODRIGUES, G. S. Indicadores socioambientais para gestão da aquicultura em múltiplas escalas. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE AQUICULTURA E BIOLOGIA AQUÁTICA, 5., 2012, Palmas. Anais... Palmas: Sociedade Brasileira de Aquicultura e Biologia Aquática, 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
| |
| 152. | | RESENDE, E. K.; QUEIROZ, J. F. de; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; LOSEKANN, M. E.; SILVA, C. A. da; PESSOA, M. C. P. Y. Manejo e gestão ambiental da aquicultura: bases tecnológicas para o desenvolvimento sustentável da aquicultura no Brasil. In: FÓRUM DE APRESENTAÇÃO DE RESULTADOS DE PESQUISA: AVANÇOS E OPORTUNIDADES, 1., 2014, Campinas. Anais... Jaguariúna: Embrapa Meio Ambiente, 2014. RE016. 8 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 153. | | MERCADANTE, M. E. Z.; CALIMAN, A. P. de M.; CANESIN, R. C.; BONILHA, S. F. M.; BERNDT, A.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; MAGNANI, E.; BRANCO, R. H. Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, Viçosa, v. 44, n. 7, p. 255-262, jul. 2015.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
| |
| 154. | | PEDREIRA, M. dos S.; PRIMAVESI, O. M. A. S. P. R.; LIMA, M. A. de; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; OLIVEIRA, S. G. de; BERCHIELLI, T. T. Ruminal methane emission by dairy cattle in Southeast Brazil Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 66, n. 6, p. 742-750, dec. 2009.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
| |
| 155. | | PIOTTO, V. C.; HERLING, V. R.; SAKAMOTO, L.; LEMES, A.; NAREZZI, F.; INOJOSA, E. F.; OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.; BERNDT, A.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S. Ruminal methane emissions in grazing beef heifers. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GREENHOUSE GASES IN AGRICULTURE, 2., 2016, Campo Grande, MS. Proceedings... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. p. 447-448. (Embrapa Gado de Corte. Documentos, 216).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 156. | | PIOTTO, V. C.; HERLING, V. R.; SAKAMOTO, L. S.; LEMES, A. P.; NAREZZI, F. A.; INOJOSA, E. F.; OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.; BERNDT, A.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S. Ruminal methane emissions in grazing beef heifers. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GREENHOUSE GASES IN AGRICULTURE, 2., 2016, Campo Grande, MS. Proceedings... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. p. 447-448. (Embrapa Gado de Corte. Documentos, 216)| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
| |
| 157. | | BERCHIELLI, T. T.; PEDREIRA, M. dos S.; OLIVEIRA, S. G. de; PRIMAVESI, O.; LIMA, M. A. de; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S. Determinação da produção de metano e PH ruminal em bovinos de corte alimentados com diferentes relações volumoso: concentrado. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 40., 2003, Santa Maria. Anais... Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; SBZ, 2003.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|  |
| 158. | | MEISTER, N. C.; LEMOS, N. L. S; ALARI, F. O.; SILVA, V. C.; KOURY FILHO, W.; MALHEIROS, E. B.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; RUGGIERI, A. C. Determination of methane production on grass fed goats. Advances in Animal Biosciences, v. 4, n. 2, p. 541, 2013. Edição dos Proceedings of the 5th Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture Conference, 2013 June, Dublin.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 159. | | COSTA, F. de S.; BAYER, C.; LIMA, M. A. de; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; BOHNEN, H.; MACEDO, V. R. M.; MARCOLIN, E. Efeito estufa, metano e sistemas de cultivo irrigado no RS. Lavoura Arrozeira, Porto Alegre, v. 52, n. 436, p. 29-32, jul./set. 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 160. | | BUSCHINELLI, C. C. A.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; RODRIGUES, I. A.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; PIRES, A. M. M.; LIGO, M. A. IRIAS, L. J. M. Avaliação socioambiental da produção de oleaginosas e a inserção no mercado de biocombustível no Brasil. In: CONGRESSO DA REDE BRASILEIRA DE TECNOLOGIA DE BIODIESEL, 2., 2007, Brasília, DF. Anais...Brasília, DF: MCT/ABIPTI, 2007.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Algodão. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 214 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/10/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/03/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
FIORENTINI, G.; CARVALHO, I. P. C.; MESSANA, J. D.; CASTAGNINO, P. S.; BERNDT, A.; CANESIN, R. C.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; BERCHIELLI, T. T. |
|
Afiliação: |
G. FIORENTINI, São Paulo State University; I. P. C. CARVALHO, São Paulo State University; J. D. MESSANA, São Paulo State University; P. S. CASTAGNINO, São Paulo State University; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, CPPSE; R. C. CANESIN, São Paulo State University; ROSA TOYOKO SHIRAISHI FRIGHETTO, CNPMA; T. T. BERCHIELLI, São Paulo State University. |
|
Título: |
Effect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and methane emissions of feedlot Nellore steers. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Animal Science, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1613-1620, apr. 2014. |
|
DOI: |
10.2527/jas.2013-6868 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compared to animals that were fed the other diets. Therefore, PO compared to the other lipid sources used in this study reduces intake, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass yield. Therefore, PO is not suggested for feedlot-finished animals. MenosThe present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compare... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Emissão de metano; Fat whole soybeans; Intake; Oil palm; Oil protected. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado nelore; Linhaça; Metano; Novilho; Nutrição animal; Óleo vegetal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Fatty acids; linseed; Linseed oil; Methane; Palm oils; Protected fat; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02962naa a2200433 a 4500
001 2003775
005 2023-03-29
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2013-6868$2DOI
100 1 $aFIORENTINI, G.
245 $aEffect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and methane emissions of feedlot Nellore steers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $aThe present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compared to animals that were fed the other diets. Therefore, PO compared to the other lipid sources used in this study reduces intake, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass yield. Therefore, PO is not suggested for feedlot-finished animals.
650 $aFatty acids
650 $alinseed
650 $aLinseed oil
650 $aMethane
650 $aPalm oils
650 $aProtected fat
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aGado nelore
650 $aLinhaça
650 $aMetano
650 $aNovilho
650 $aNutrição animal
650 $aÓleo vegetal
653 $aEmissão de metano
653 $aFat whole soybeans
653 $aIntake
653 $aOil palm
653 $aOil protected
700 1 $aCARVALHO, I. P. C.
700 1 $aMESSANA, J. D.
700 1 $aCASTAGNINO, P. S.
700 1 $aBERNDT, A.
700 1 $aCANESIN, R. C.
700 1 $aFRIGHETTO, R. T. S.
700 1 $aBERCHIELLI, T. T.
773 $tJournal of Animal Science$gv. 92, n. 4, p. 1613-1620, apr. 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
