| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 17 | |
| 1. |  | GALON, L.; FERNANDES, F. F.; ANDRES, A.; SILVA, A. F. da; FORTE, C. T. Selectivity and efficiency of herbicides in weed control on sweet sorghum. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, Goiânia, v. 46, n. 2, p. 123-131, abr./jun. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|    |
| 3. | | FRANDOLOSO, F. S.; GALON, L.; CONCENÇO, G.; ROSSETTO, E. R. O.; BIANCHESSI, F.; SANTIN, C. O.; FORTE, C. T. Interference and level of economic damage of Alexandergrass on corn. Planta Daninha, v. 38, e020219966, 2020. 12 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 4. | | SANTIN, C. O.; PERIN, G. F.; FORTE, C. T.; FIABANE, R. C.; ANDRES, A.; SILVA, A. F. da; GALON, L. Eficiência e seletividade de herbicidas aplicados em sorgo sacarino. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE MILHO E SORGO, 31., 2016, Bento Gonçalves. Milho e sorgo: inovações, mercados e segurança alimentar: anais. Sete Lagoas: Associação Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 5. | | PILLA, T. P.; GALON, L.; BRANDLER, DAIANI.; BIANCHESE, F.; TONIN, R. J.; TONI, J. R.; FORTE, C. T.; VARGAS, L. Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. Journal Of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, p. 721-736, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 6. | | FORTE, C. T.; GALON, L.; BEUTLER, A. N.; BASSO, F. J. M.; NONEMACHER, F.; REICHERT JÚNIOR, F. W.; PERIN, G. F.; TIRONI, S. P. Soil management systems and their effect on the weed seed bank. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 53, n. 4, p. 435-442, abr. 2018. Título em português: Sistemas de manejo do solo e sua influência no banco de sementes de plantas daninhas.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 7. | | FORTE, C. T.; GALON, L.; CONCENCO, G.; REICHERT JUNIOR, F. W.; ANDRES, A.; SCARIOT, M. A.; MULINARI, J.; MOSSI, A. J.; TREICHEL, H. Technologies and challenges for weed control in rice. In: TIMAYER, A.; KADYROV, G. (Ed). Rice and rice straw: production, cultivation and uses. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2018. Chapter 4. p. 115-140 Series: Agriculture Issues and Policies.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|  |
| 8. | | REZENDES, I.; BASEGGIO, E. R.; GALON, L.; BRANDLER, D.; FORTE, C. T.; ASPIAZÚ, I.; FRANCESCHETTI, M. B.; SILVA, A. F. da. Allelopathy of weeds on the growth of vegetables. Communications in Plant Sciences, v. 10, p. 1-10, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 9. | | BALDESSARINI, R.; GALON, L; VARGAS, L.; MÜLLER, C.; BRANDLER, D.; SILVA, J. D. G. DA; FORTE, C. T.; FRANCESCHETTI, M. B.; TIRONI, S. P.; PERIN, GISMAEL FRANCISCO. Morphophysiological responses of wheat cultivars in competition with diploid and tetraploid ryegrass. Journal Of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, p . 546-568, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 10. | | THIEL, C. H.; DAVID, F. A. de; GALON, L.; DEUNER, S.; FORTE, C. T.; PERIN, G. F.; DAVID, P. R. de; MOSSI, A. J.; ANDRES, A.; CONCENCO, G. Physiology of weeds in intraspecific competition. Journal of Agricultural Science, v. 10, n. 6, p. 334-340, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 11. | | DAVID, F. A. de; GALON, L.; PERIN, G. F.; CONCENCO, G.; CASTAMANN, A.; FORTE, C. T.; DAVID, P. R. de; MOSSI, A. J.; ANDRES, A.; MOISINHO, I. S. Weed interference in the morphophysiological and nutritional characteristics of erva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis). American Journal of Plant Sciences, v. 9, p. 435-445, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 12. | | GALON, L.; CONCENCO, G.; PERIN, G. F.; SILVA, A. F. da; FORTE, C. T.; DAVID, F. de A.; RADÜZ, L. L.; RADUNZ, A. L.; ANDRES, A.; TIRONI, S. P.; CONCENÇO, S. E. Comparison of experimental methods to assess the competitive ability of weed species. American Journal of Plant Sciences, v. 6, p. 2185-2196, Aug. 2015.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 13. | | FORTE, C. T.; BEUTLER, A. N.; GQLON, L.; CASTOLDI, C. T.; WINTER, F. L.; HOLZ, C. M.; BIANCHESSI, F.; CONCENCO, G.; CHECHI, L.; FERREIRA, M. M.; ANDRES, A.; BURG, G. M. Soil physical properties and grain yield influenced by cover crops and crop rotation. American Journal of Plant Sciences, v. 9, p. 584-598, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 14. | | GALON, L.; WEIRICH, S. N.; FRANCESCHETTI, M. B.; ASPIAZU, I.; SILVA, A. F. da; FORTE, C. T.; ROSSETTO, E. R. de O.; BRANDLER, D.; PERIN, G. F.; ULKOVSKI, C. Selectivity of saflufenacil applied alone or mixed to glyphosate in maize. Journal of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, n. 3, p. 775-787, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 15. | | GALON, L.; BRUNETTO, L.; SILVA, A. M. L. da; SOLIGO, V.; CAVALETTI, D. C.; SILVA, A. F. da; GALLINA, A.; FRANCESCHETTI, M. B.; FORTE, C. T.; PERIN, G. F. Tank mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D applied on RR® maize crop. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, v. 56, n. 11, p. 948-953, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 16. | | GALON, L.; SILVA, M. R. da; ROSSETTO, E. R. de O.; SILVA, A. F. da; ASPIAZU, I.; FAVRETTO, E. L.; BRUNETTO, L.; PAWELKIEWICZ, R.; FORTE, C. T.; PERIN, G. F. Interaction between pesticides applied alone or in mixtures in corn. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, v. 56, n. 11, p. 986-993, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 17. | | TIRONI, S. P.; GALON, L.; SILVA, A. F. da; FIALHO, C. M. T.; ROCHA, P. R. R.; FARIA, A. T.; ASPIAZU, I.; FORTE, C. T.; SILVA, A. A. da; RADUNZ, A. L. Época de emergência de azevém e nabo sobre a habilidade competitiva da cultura da cevada. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 44, n. 9, p. 1527-1533, set. 2014.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 17 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/02/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/02/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
C - 0 |
|
Autoria: |
PILLA, T. P.; GALON, L.; BRANDLER, DAIANI.; BIANCHESE, F.; TONIN, R. J.; TONI, J. R.; FORTE, C. T.; VARGAS, L. |
|
Afiliação: |
THALITA PEDROZO PILLA, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim ZIP CODE: 99700 000, Erechim, Rio Grande do Su l, Brazil; LEANDRO GALON, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; DAIANI BRANDLER, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; FELIPE BIANCHESE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; RODRIGO JOSÉ TONIN, Dept. of Agronomy , The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; JOSIEL RICARDO TONI, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira S ul UFFS, Campus Erechim; CESAR TIAGO FORTE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; LEANDRO VARGAS, CNPT. |
|
Título: |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal Of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, p. 721-736, 2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply maturation herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.herbicides to canola is in the G4 season. MenosThe use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply matu... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Anticipation of harvest; Brassica napus L var oleifera. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Seed quality. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/220995/1/Pilla-2020-721.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02314naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2129849
005 2021-02-08
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPILLA, T. P.
245 $aPhysical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThe use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply maturation herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.
650 $aSeed quality
653 $aAnticipation of harvest
653 $aBrassica napus L var oleifera
700 1 $aGALON, L.
700 1 $aBRANDLER, DAIANI.
700 1 $aBIANCHESE, F.
700 1 $aTONIN, R. J.
700 1 $aTONI, J. R.
700 1 $aFORTE, C. T.
700 1 $aVARGAS, L.
773 $tJournal Of Agricultural Studies$gv. 8, p. 721-736, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
