| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 70 | |
| 42. |  | MARTINHO, P. R. R.; DALTIO, J.; FONSECA, M. F.; FERNANDES, I. V.; DALMOLIN, T. DE C.; MAGALHÃES, L. A. Avaliação do Cenário Agropecuário Atual de Assentamentos Rurais do MATOPIBA. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO, 18., 2017, Santos. Anais... Santos: Inpe, 2017. p. 5217-5224| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
|    |
| 43. | | FONSECA, M. F.; DALTIO, J.; MAGALHÃES, L. A.; CASTRO, G. S. A.; CARVALHO, C. A. de; MARTINHO, P. R. R. Análise do cadastro das terras atribuídas no Brasil e sua importância para a gestão de conflitos no âmbito da governança fundiária In: COLETÂNEA DO II SEMINÁRIO GOVERNANÇA DE TERRAS E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO, 2016, Campinas. Anais... Campinas, SP: Unicamp, 2016. p. 323 - 337. II Seminário Governança de Terras e Desenvolvimento Econômico. Disponível em: | Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
|  |
| 44. | | MAGALHÃES, L. A.; FONSECA, M. F.; MARTINHO, P. R. R.; CASTRO, G. S. A.; DALTIO, J.; CARVALHO, C. A. de. Apoio ao desenvolvimento agropecuário e social em Alagoas In: SIMPÓSIO SOBRE AS GEOTECNOLOGIAS E GEOINFORMAÇÃO NO ESTADO DE ALAGOAS, 4., 2016, Maceió. Anais... Maceió, AL: SEPLAG, 2016. 4º GeoAlagoas.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| 45. | | CARVALHO, A. C.; AQUINO, A. M. de; ASSIS, R. L. de; FONSECA, M. F. A. C.; SCHUENK, R. J. Avaliação da gestão de resíduos orgânicos nas unidades de produção vinculas a escola família agrícola em Nova Friburgo, RJ. In:CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE AGROECOLOGIA, 6.; CONGRESSO LATINO AMERICANO DE AGROECOLOGIA, 2., 09 a 12 de novembro de 2009, Curitiba. Agricultura familiar e camponesa: experiências passadas e presentes construindo um futuro sustentável: trabalhos... Curitiba: ABA: SOCLA, 2009. 01 p.01763-01677| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 48. | | CASTRO, G. S. A.; MAGALHÃES, L. A.; FONSECA, M. F.; HOMMA, A. K. O.; MIRANDA, E. E. de. Inteligência territorial para o desenvolvimento agropecuário de Roraima. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, DF, v. 45, n. 3, p. 77-95, set./dez. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| 51. | | RONQUIM, C. C.; ALVAREZ, I. A.; RODRIGUES, C. A. G.; FONSECA, M. F.; GARCON, E. A. M. Dinâmica florestal e detecção de áreas de preservação permanente e reserva legal em municípios paulista. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, v. 39, e201902043, p. 625, 2019. Special issue. Abstracts of the XXV IUFRO World Congress, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| 55. | | MAGALHÃES, L. A.; FONSECA, M. F.; CASTRO, G. S. A.; DALTIO, J.; MARTINHO, P. R. R.; CARVALHO, C. A. de. Qualificação Territorial da Agropecuária e Socioeconomia do Pantanal Brasileiro In: SIMPÓSIO DE GEOTECNOLOGIAS NO PANTANAL, 6., 2016, Cuiabá. Anais... São José dos Campos: INPE; Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| 56. | | CASTRO, G. S. A.; CARVALHO, C. A. de; MAGALHÃES, L. A.; OSHIRO, O. T.; MARTINHO, P. R. R.; DALTIO, J.; FONSECA, M. F.; MIRANDA, E. E. de. Agriculture and environmental preservation: first results of an unparalleled analysis in Brazil. SEED News International seed magazine, v. 22, special edition, p. 08-13, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| 59. | | CASTRO, G. S. A.; CARVALHO, C. A. de; MAGALHÃES, L. A.; OSHIRO, O. T.; MARTINHO, P. R. R.; DALTIO, J.; FONSECA, M. F.; MIRANDA, E. E. de. Agricultura e preservação ambiental: primeiras análises e resultados do CAR no Brasil. SEED News, v. 21, n. 7, nov./dez., 2017. p. 28-33.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 70 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Territorial. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/11/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/11/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Documentos |
|
Autoria: |
SÃO JOSÉ, F. F. DE; NOVO, Y. C. DE C.; FARIAS, A. R.; MAGALHÃES, L. A.; FONSECA, M. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
FLAVIANO FERNANDES DE SÃO JOSÉ, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; YARA CRISTINA DE CARVALHO NOVO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; ANDRE RODRIGO FARIAS, CNPM; LUCIOLA ALVES MAGALHAES, CNPM; MARCELO FERNANDO FONSECA, CNPM. |
|
Título: |
Mapping Brazilian aquaculture ponds using Remote Sensing. |
|
Título original: |
Mapeamento de viveiros escavados para aquicultura no Brasil por sensoriamento remoto. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Campinas: Embrapa Territorial, 2023. |
|
Páginas: |
27 p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Territorial. Documentos, 151) |
|
ISSN: |
0103-7811 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
ODS 6. |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT: Aquaculture activities have been part of mankind's history for centuries. In Aktihep's tomb (2,500 B.C.), ancient Egypt, scenes of men removing tilapias from aquaculture ponds are depicted (Basurco; Lovatelli, 2003). In Brazil, aquaculture is defined by Brazilian federal law no. 11,959, from June 29, 2009, as the total or partial growth of organisms in aquatic environments, typically within a confined or controlled space. Fishing may be defined as the capture of fishery resources in a natural environment. Aquaculture's advantage over fishing is the generation of more homogeneous, traceable, and consistently available products (Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura, 2022a). Fishing and aquaculture play an essential role in food production and supply for both human and animal consumption, and also generate employment and income in various parts of the world. Economic forms of production are practiced as standalone activities or in association with other agricultural activities, such as farming and livestock rearing (Allison, 2011). There are also hybrid production systems, such as rice?shrimp or rice?fish (Renaud et al., 2015). In this context, aquaculture has a multiplier economic potential in rural frontiers (Allison, 2011). The applicability of Remote Sensing products and services to aquaculture may be divided into three areas: i) monitoring water quality, ii) selecting areas for aquaculture activities, and iii) mapping and monitoring aquaculture production structures (Boivin et al., 2004). The latter is essential for the formulation of appropriate regulations and the provision of government incentives, for the territorial planning of aquaculture activities, and to provide statistical and geospatial data for market intelligence studies. Over the last decades, scientific researches on aquaculture have shed light on the role played by this economic activity as a replacement for fisheries, as well as on its environmental and social impacts and on the outcomes of this change for global food production (Naylor et al., 2000). There is a trend for greater technological developments in management, with the aim of reducing unwanted environmental effects, increasing product quality and improving the industry's potential for employment and income generation (FAO, 2020; 2021). MenosABSTRACT: Aquaculture activities have been part of mankind's history for centuries. In Aktihep's tomb (2,500 B.C.), ancient Egypt, scenes of men removing tilapias from aquaculture ponds are depicted (Basurco; Lovatelli, 2003). In Brazil, aquaculture is defined by Brazilian federal law no. 11,959, from June 29, 2009, as the total or partial growth of organisms in aquatic environments, typically within a confined or controlled space. Fishing may be defined as the capture of fishery resources in a natural environment. Aquaculture's advantage over fishing is the generation of more homogeneous, traceable, and consistently available products (Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura, 2022a). Fishing and aquaculture play an essential role in food production and supply for both human and animal consumption, and also generate employment and income in various parts of the world. Economic forms of production are practiced as standalone activities or in association with other agricultural activities, such as farming and livestock rearing (Allison, 2011). There are also hybrid production systems, such as rice?shrimp or rice?fish (Renaud et al., 2015). In this context, aquaculture has a multiplier economic potential in rural frontiers (Allison, 2011). The applicability of Remote Sensing products and services to aquaculture may be divided into three areas: i) monitoring water quality, ii) selecting areas for aquaculture activities, and iii) mapping and monitoring aquaculture production structures (Boiv... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Geoprocessing; Sentinel. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1157761/1/6176.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03071nam a2200253 a 4500
001 2157761
005 2023-11-03
008 2023 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
022 $a0103-7811
100 1 $aSÃO JOSÉ, F. F. DE
240 $aMapeamento de viveiros escavados para aquicultura no Brasil por sensoriamento remoto.
245 $aMapping Brazilian aquaculture ponds using Remote Sensing.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aCampinas: Embrapa Territorial$c2023
300 $a27 p.
490 $a(Embrapa Territorial. Documentos, 151)
500 $aODS 6.
520 $aABSTRACT: Aquaculture activities have been part of mankind's history for centuries. In Aktihep's tomb (2,500 B.C.), ancient Egypt, scenes of men removing tilapias from aquaculture ponds are depicted (Basurco; Lovatelli, 2003). In Brazil, aquaculture is defined by Brazilian federal law no. 11,959, from June 29, 2009, as the total or partial growth of organisms in aquatic environments, typically within a confined or controlled space. Fishing may be defined as the capture of fishery resources in a natural environment. Aquaculture's advantage over fishing is the generation of more homogeneous, traceable, and consistently available products (Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura, 2022a). Fishing and aquaculture play an essential role in food production and supply for both human and animal consumption, and also generate employment and income in various parts of the world. Economic forms of production are practiced as standalone activities or in association with other agricultural activities, such as farming and livestock rearing (Allison, 2011). There are also hybrid production systems, such as rice?shrimp or rice?fish (Renaud et al., 2015). In this context, aquaculture has a multiplier economic potential in rural frontiers (Allison, 2011). The applicability of Remote Sensing products and services to aquaculture may be divided into three areas: i) monitoring water quality, ii) selecting areas for aquaculture activities, and iii) mapping and monitoring aquaculture production structures (Boivin et al., 2004). The latter is essential for the formulation of appropriate regulations and the provision of government incentives, for the territorial planning of aquaculture activities, and to provide statistical and geospatial data for market intelligence studies. Over the last decades, scientific researches on aquaculture have shed light on the role played by this economic activity as a replacement for fisheries, as well as on its environmental and social impacts and on the outcomes of this change for global food production (Naylor et al., 2000). There is a trend for greater technological developments in management, with the aim of reducing unwanted environmental effects, increasing product quality and improving the industry's potential for employment and income generation (FAO, 2020; 2021).
650 $aAgriculture
653 $aGeoprocessing
653 $aSentinel
700 1 $aNOVO, Y. C. DE C.
700 1 $aFARIAS, A. R.
700 1 $aMAGALHÃES, L. A.
700 1 $aFONSECA, M. F.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Territorial (CNPM) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
