| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 70 | |
| 45. |  | SANTOS, D.; BARBOSA, C. F.; ALCANTARA, P. H. R. de; FLORES, R. M. V.; WEBBER, D. C.; MAGALHÃES, M. M. de S.; SIMÃO, A. H. Advances in technology transference: the experience of integrated crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF) adoption in Tocantins State. In: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FOREST SYSTEMS; INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS, 3., 2015, Brasília, DF. Towards sustainable intensification: proceedings. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|    |
| 46. | | REBELATTO JUNIOR, I. A.; LIMA, A. F.; PRYSTHON, A.; ROSA, D. K.; PINHO, M. S. de; FLORES, R. M. V.; SOARES, S. S. Levantamento da atuação da Embrapa em pesquisa, desenvolvimento e transferência de tecnologia nas áreas de pesca e aquicultura. Palmas: Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura, 2015. 293 p. (Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Documentos, 11).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
| |
| 47. | | PEDROZA FILHO, M. X.; RODRIGUES, A. P. O.; REZENDE, F. P.; FLORES, R. M. V.; MUNOZ, A. E. P.; BARROSO, R. M. Analysis of a participatory approach for collection of economic data in aquaculture systems at farm level in Brazil. Custos e @gronegócio on line, Recife, v. 13, n. 1, p. 294-314, jan./mar. 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
| |
| 49. | | REBELATTO JUNIOR, I. A.; FLORES, R. M. V.; LIMA, A. F.; PRYSTHON, A.; ROSA, D. K.; PINHO, M. S. de; SOARES, S. S. Diagnóstico estratégico de instituições ofertantes e demandantes de tecnologias em pesca e aquicultura - Projeto Aquapesquisa. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENGENHARIA DE PESCA, 18., 2013, Paulo Afonso. [Anais]. Paulo Afonso: Uneb, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
| |
| 51. | | MUNOZ, A. E. P.; FLORES, R. M. V.; PEDROZA FILHO, M. X.; BARROSO, R. M.; RODRIGUES, A. P. O.; MATAVELI, M.; REZENDE, F. P. Piscicultores e demais agentes da cadeia produtiva discutem os custos de produção de pirarucu em viveiro escavado em Ariquemes, Rondônia. Palmas: Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura, 2015. 6 p. (Informativo Campo Futuro, 16).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 70 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/10/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/11/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
PEDROZA FILHO, M. X.; RODRIGUES, A. P. O.; REZENDE, F. P.; FLORES, R. M. V.; MUNOZ, A. E. P.; BARROSO, R. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
MANOEL XAVIER PEDROZA FILHO, CNPASA; ANA PAULA OEDA RODRIGUES, CNPASA; FABRICIO PEREIRA REZENDE, CNPASA; ROBERTO MANOLIO VALLADAO FLORES, CNPASA; ANDREA ELENA PIZARRO MUNOZ, CNPASA; RENATA MELON BARROSO, CNPASA. |
|
Título: |
Analysis of a participatory approach for collection of economic data in aquaculture systems at farm level in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Custos e @gronegócio on line, Recife, v. 13, n. 1, p. 294-314, jan./mar. 2017. |
|
ISSN: |
1808-2882 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Economic assessment at the farm level requires a robust methodology in order to assure reliability. This paper describes an innovative methodology and analyzes its ability to fill a gap regarding economic methodology for farm level aquaculture in Brazil. This methodology consists of collection of technical parameters, production costs and other economic information by expert panels with value chain agents. Variables are obtained through consensus among panel participants considering the typical farm approach (TFA). All collected data are presented to producers in order to improve comprehension about their performance. A benefit of this methodology includes highly reliable data because information is provided by a representative sample of producers that confirm it in a consensus process. Moreover, data collection costs are low in comparison to individual interviews or survey methods. Continuous updating of inputs prices and the high level of participation of producers are other assets of this method. Despite its effectiveness the method presents some challenges including: (a) the heterogeneity of producer profiles and consequent difficulty in standardizing data, (b) the logistic requirements related to organization of meetings, and (c) mobilization of producers and other panel participants in order to assure their representative presence in the meeting. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Panel method; Typical farmer. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agronegócio; Aquicultura; Custo de produção. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Fish farms; Production costs. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/165803/1/CNPASA-2017-ap.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02225naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2078459
005 2017-11-24
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1808-2882
100 1 $aPEDROZA FILHO, M. X.
245 $aAnalysis of a participatory approach for collection of economic data in aquaculture systems at farm level in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aEconomic assessment at the farm level requires a robust methodology in order to assure reliability. This paper describes an innovative methodology and analyzes its ability to fill a gap regarding economic methodology for farm level aquaculture in Brazil. This methodology consists of collection of technical parameters, production costs and other economic information by expert panels with value chain agents. Variables are obtained through consensus among panel participants considering the typical farm approach (TFA). All collected data are presented to producers in order to improve comprehension about their performance. A benefit of this methodology includes highly reliable data because information is provided by a representative sample of producers that confirm it in a consensus process. Moreover, data collection costs are low in comparison to individual interviews or survey methods. Continuous updating of inputs prices and the high level of participation of producers are other assets of this method. Despite its effectiveness the method presents some challenges including: (a) the heterogeneity of producer profiles and consequent difficulty in standardizing data, (b) the logistic requirements related to organization of meetings, and (c) mobilization of producers and other panel participants in order to assure their representative presence in the meeting.
650 $aFish farms
650 $aProduction costs
650 $aAgronegócio
650 $aAquicultura
650 $aCusto de produção
653 $aPanel method
653 $aTypical farmer
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, A. P. O.
700 1 $aREZENDE, F. P.
700 1 $aFLORES, R. M. V.
700 1 $aMUNOZ, A. E. P.
700 1 $aBARROSO, R. M.
773 $tCustos e @gronegócio on line, Recife$gv. 13, n. 1, p. 294-314, jan./mar. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
