|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
Data corrente: |
20/04/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
20/04/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
WIJAYAWARDENE, N. N.; HYDE, K. D.; AL-ANI, L. K. T.; TEDERSOO, L.; HAELEWATERS, D.; RAJESHKUMAR, K. C.; ZHAO, R. L; APTROOT, A.; LEONTYEV, D. V.; SAXENA, R. K.; TOKAREV, Y. S.; DAI, D. Q.; LETCHER, P. M.; STEPHENSON, S. L.; ERTZ, D.; LUMBSCH, H. T.; KUKWA, M.; ISSI, I. V.; MADRID, H.; PHILLIPS, A. J. L.; SELBMANN, L.; PFLIEGLER, W. P.; HORVÁTH, E.; BENSCH, K.; KIRK, P. M.; KOLARÍKOVÁ, K.; RAJA, H. A.; RADEK, R.; PAPP, V.; DIMA, V.; MA, J.; MALOSSO, E.; TAKAMATSU, S.; RAMBOLD, G.; GANNIBAL, P. B.; TRIEBEL, D.; GAUTAM, A. K.; AVASTHI, S.; SUETRONG, S.; TIMDAL, E.; FRYAR, S. C.; DELGADO, G.; RÉBLOVÁ, M.; DOILOM, M.; DOLATABADI, S.; PAWLOWSKA, J. Z.; HUMBER, R. A.; KODSUEB, R.; SÁNCHEZ-CASTRO, I.; GOTO, B. T.; SILVA, D. K. A.; SOUZA, F. A. de; OEHL, F.; SILVA, G. A. da; BLASZKOWSKI, J.; JOBIM, K.; MAIA, L. C.; BARBOSA, F. R.; FIUZA, P. O.; DIVAKAR, P. K.; SHENOY, B. D.; CASTAÑEDA-RUIZ, R. F.; SOMRITHIPOL, S.; LATEEF, A. A.; KARUNARATHNA, S. C.; TIBPROMMA, S.; MORTIMER, P. E.; WANASINGHE, D. N.; PHOOKAMSAK, R.; XU, J.; WANG, Y.; TIAN, F.; ALVARADO, P.; LI, D. W.; KUSAN, I.; MATOCEC, N.; MESIC, A.; TKALCEC, Z.; MAHARACHCHIKUMBURA, S. S. N.; PAPIZADEH, M.; HEREDIA, G.; WARTCHOW, F.; BAKHSHI, M.; BOEHM, E.; YOUSSEF, N.; HUSTAD, V. P.; LAWREY, J. D.; SANTIAGO, A. L. C. M. A.; BEZERRA, J. D. P.; SOUZA-MOTTA, C. M.; FIRMINO, A. L.; TIAN, Q.; HOUBRAKEN, J.; HONGSANAN, S.; TANAKA, K.; DISSANAYAKE, A. J.; MONTEIRO, J. S.; GROSSART, H. P.; SUIJA, A.; WEERAKOON, G.; ETAYO, J.; TSURYKAU, A.; VÁZQUEZ, V.; MUNGAI, P.; DAMM, U.; LI, Q. R.; ZHANG, H.; BOONMEE, S.; LU, Y. Z.; BECERRA, A. G.; KENDRICK, B.; BREARLEY, F. Q.; MOTIEJUNAITE, J.; SHARMA, B.; KHARE, R.; GAIKWAD, S.; WIJESUNDARA, D. S. A.; TANG, L. Z.; HE, M. Q.; FLAKUS, A.; RODRIGUEZ-FLAKUS, P.; ZHURBENKO, M. P.; MCKENZIE, E. H. C.; STADLER, M.; BHAT, D. J.; LIU, J. K.; RAZA, M.; JEEWON, R.; NASSONOVA, E. S.; PRIETO, M.; JAYALAL, R. G. U.; ERDOGDU, M.; YURKOV, A.; SCHNITTLER, M.; SHCHEPIN, O. N.; NOVOZHILOV, Y. K.; SILVA-FILHO, A. G. S.; GENTEKAKI, E.; LIU, P.; CAVENDER, J. C.; KANG, Y.; MOHAMMAD, S.; ZHANG, L. F.; XU, R. F.; LI, Y. M.; DAYARATHNE, M. C.; EKANAYAKA, A. H.; WEN, T. C.; DENG, C. Y.; PEREIRA, O. L.; NAVATHE, S.; HAWKSWORTH, D. L.; FAN, X. L.; DISSANAYAKE, L. S.; KUHNERT, E.; GROSSART, H. P.; THINES, M. |
Afiliação: |
Qujing Normal University; Mae Fah Luang University; University of Baghdad; University of Tartu; University of South Bohemia; National Fungal Culture Collection of India -NFCCI; State Key Laboratory of Mycology; Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul; Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University; University Road; All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection; Qujing Normal University; The University of Alabama; University of Arkansas; Botanic Garden Meise; The Field Museum; University of Gda?sk; All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection; Universidad Mayor; Universidade de Lisboa; University of Tuscia; University of Debrecen; University of Debrecen; Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute; Royal Botanic Gardens; Czech Academy of Sciences; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Freie Universität Berlin; Szent István University; Eötvös Loránd University; Jiangxi Agricultural University; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Mie University; Universität of Bayreuth; All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection; Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns; Abhilashi University; Jiwaji University; National Science and Technology Development Agency -NSTDA; University of Oslo; Flinders University; EMLab P&K Houston; Academy of Sciences; Chiang Mai University; Sabzevar University of New Technology; University of Warsaw; USDA-ARS Emerging Pests and Pathogens Research; Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University; Universidad de Granada; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Universidade Federal da Paraíba; FRANCISCO ADRIANO DE SOUZA, CNPMS; Agroscope, Competence Div Plants & Plant Prod.; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; West Pomeranian University of Technology; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Universidad Complutense de Madrid; CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography Regional Centre; Instituto de Investigaciones Fundamentales en AgriculturaTropical; BIOTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency - NSTDA; University of Ilorin; Kunming Institute of Botany; Kunming Institute of Botany; Kunming Institute of Botany; Kunming Institute of Botany; Mae Fah Luang University; Kunming Institute of Botany; Guizhou University; Guizhou University; ALVALAB; Valley Laboratory; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; Ru?er Boškovi? Institute; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Pasteur Institute of Iran; Instituto de Ecolog? 'a A. C.; Universidade Federal da Paraíba; Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection; Oklahoma State University; Northwest Missouri State University; George Mason University; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Mae Fah Luang University; Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute; Shenzhen University; Hirosaki University; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; Leibnitz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries - IGB; University of Tartu; The Natural History Museum; IES Zizur; Skorina Gomel State University; University of Málaga; Kenya Wildlife Service; Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz; Guizhou Medical University; Kunming University of Science and Technology; Mae Fah Luang University; Guizhou University; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Manchester Metropolitan University; Nature Research Centre; Agharkar Research Institute; Agharkar Research Institute; Agharkar Research Institute; National Institute of Fundamental Studies; Qujing Normal University; Institute of Microbiology Chinese Academy of Sciences; Szafer Institute of Botany; Szafer Institute of Botany; Russian Academy of Sciences; Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research; Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Institute of Microbiology Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Mauritius; Russian Academy of Sciences; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos; University of Sri Lanka; K?r?ehir Ahi Evran University; Leibniz Institute; Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald; Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian Academy of Sciences; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Mae Fah Luang University; Jilin Agricultural University; Ohio University; Guizhou Medical University; Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology -IROST; Qujing Normal University; Qujing Normal University; Qujing Normal University; Guizhou University; Mae Fah Luang University; Guizhou University; Guizhou Academy of Science; Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Agharkar Research Institute; Jilin Agricultural University; Beijing Forestry University; Guizhou University; Leibniz University; Leibnitz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries -IGB; Goethe University. |
Título: |
Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Mycosphere, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1060-1456, 2020. |
DOI: |
10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
This article provides an outline of the classification of the kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi. i.e. dispersed spores, mycelia, sporophores, mycorrhizas). We treat 19 phyla of fungi. These are Aphelidiomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Caulochytriomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota and Zoopagomycota. The placement of all fungal genera is provided at the class-, order- and family-level. The described number of species per genus is also given. Notes are provided of taxa for which recent changes or disagreements have been presented. Fungus-like taxa that were traditionally treated as fungi are also incorporated in this outline (i.e. Eumycetozoa, Dictyosteliomycetes, Ceratiomyxomycetes and Myxomycetes). Four new taxa are introduced: Amblyosporida ord. nov. Neopereziida ord. nov. and Ovavesiculida ord. nov. in Rozellomycota, and Protosporangiaceae fam. nov. in Dictyosteliomycetes. Two different classifications (in outline section and in discussion) are provided for Glomeromycota and Leotiomycetes based on recent studies. The phylogenetic reconstruction of a four-gene dataset (18S and 28S rRNA, RPB1, RPB2) of 433 taxa is presented, including all currently described orders of fungi. |
Thesagro: |
Fungo. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Amblyosporidae; Ascomycota; Basidiomycota; Microsporidia. |
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/212407/1/Outline-fungi.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 06573naa a2202065 a 4500 001 2121744 005 2020-04-20 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8$2DOI 100 1 $aWIJAYAWARDENE, N. N. 245 $aOutline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aThis article provides an outline of the classification of the kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi. i.e. dispersed spores, mycelia, sporophores, mycorrhizas). We treat 19 phyla of fungi. These are Aphelidiomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Caulochytriomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota and Zoopagomycota. The placement of all fungal genera is provided at the class-, order- and family-level. The described number of species per genus is also given. Notes are provided of taxa for which recent changes or disagreements have been presented. Fungus-like taxa that were traditionally treated as fungi are also incorporated in this outline (i.e. Eumycetozoa, Dictyosteliomycetes, Ceratiomyxomycetes and Myxomycetes). Four new taxa are introduced: Amblyosporida ord. nov. Neopereziida ord. nov. and Ovavesiculida ord. nov. in Rozellomycota, and Protosporangiaceae fam. nov. in Dictyosteliomycetes. Two different classifications (in outline section and in discussion) are provided for Glomeromycota and Leotiomycetes based on recent studies. The phylogenetic reconstruction of a four-gene dataset (18S and 28S rRNA, RPB1, RPB2) of 433 taxa is presented, including all currently described orders of fungi. 650 $aAmblyosporidae 650 $aAscomycota 650 $aBasidiomycota 650 $aMicrosporidia 650 $aFungo 700 1 $aHYDE, K. D. 700 1 $aAL-ANI, L. K. T. 700 1 $aTEDERSOO, L. 700 1 $aHAELEWATERS, D. 700 1 $aRAJESHKUMAR, K. C. 700 1 $aZHAO, R. L 700 1 $aAPTROOT, A. 700 1 $aLEONTYEV, D. V. 700 1 $aSAXENA, R. K. 700 1 $aTOKAREV, Y. S. 700 1 $aDAI, D. Q. 700 1 $aLETCHER, P. M. 700 1 $aSTEPHENSON, S. L. 700 1 $aERTZ, D. 700 1 $aLUMBSCH, H. T. 700 1 $aKUKWA, M. 700 1 $aISSI, I. V. 700 1 $aMADRID, H. 700 1 $aPHILLIPS, A. J. L. 700 1 $aSELBMANN, L. 700 1 $aPFLIEGLER, W. P. 700 1 $aHORVÁTH, E. 700 1 $aBENSCH, K. 700 1 $aKIRK, P. M. 700 1 $aKOLARÍKOVÁ, K. 700 1 $aRAJA, H. A. 700 1 $aRADEK, R. 700 1 $aPAPP, V. 700 1 $aDIMA, V. 700 1 $aMA, J. 700 1 $aMALOSSO, E. 700 1 $aTAKAMATSU, S. 700 1 $aRAMBOLD, G. 700 1 $aGANNIBAL, P. B. 700 1 $aTRIEBEL, D. 700 1 $aGAUTAM, A. K. 700 1 $aAVASTHI, S. 700 1 $aSUETRONG, S. 700 1 $aTIMDAL, E. 700 1 $aFRYAR, S. C. 700 1 $aDELGADO, G. 700 1 $aRÉBLOVÁ, M. 700 1 $aDOILOM, M. 700 1 $aDOLATABADI, S. 700 1 $aPAWLOWSKA, J. Z. 700 1 $aHUMBER, R. A. 700 1 $aKODSUEB, R. 700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ-CASTRO, I. 700 1 $aGOTO, B. T. 700 1 $aSILVA, D. K. A. 700 1 $aSOUZA, F. A. de 700 1 $aOEHL, F. 700 1 $aSILVA, G. A. da 700 1 $aBLASZKOWSKI, J. 700 1 $aJOBIM, K. 700 1 $aMAIA, L. C. 700 1 $aBARBOSA, F. R. 700 1 $aFIUZA, P. O. 700 1 $aDIVAKAR, P. K. 700 1 $aSHENOY, B. D. 700 1 $aCASTAÑEDA-RUIZ, R. F. 700 1 $aSOMRITHIPOL, S. 700 1 $aLATEEF, A. A. 700 1 $aKARUNARATHNA, S. C. 700 1 $aTIBPROMMA, S. 700 1 $aMORTIMER, P. E. 700 1 $aWANASINGHE, D. N. 700 1 $aPHOOKAMSAK, R. 700 1 $aXU, J. 700 1 $aWANG, Y. 700 1 $aTIAN, F. 700 1 $aALVARADO, P. 700 1 $aLI, D. W. 700 1 $aKUSAN, I. 700 1 $aMATOCEC, N. 700 1 $aMESIC, A. 700 1 $aTKALCEC, Z. 700 1 $aMAHARACHCHIKUMBURA, S. S. N. 700 1 $aPAPIZADEH, M. 700 1 $aHEREDIA, G. 700 1 $aWARTCHOW, F. 700 1 $aBAKHSHI, M. 700 1 $aBOEHM, E. 700 1 $aYOUSSEF, N. 700 1 $aHUSTAD, V. P. 700 1 $aLAWREY, J. D. 700 1 $aSANTIAGO, A. L. C. M. A. 700 1 $aBEZERRA, J. D. P. 700 1 $aSOUZA-MOTTA, C. M. 700 1 $aFIRMINO, A. L. 700 1 $aTIAN, Q. 700 1 $aHOUBRAKEN, J. 700 1 $aHONGSANAN, S. 700 1 $aTANAKA, K. 700 1 $aDISSANAYAKE, A. J. 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, J. S. 700 1 $aGROSSART, H. P. 700 1 $aSUIJA, A. 700 1 $aWEERAKOON, G. 700 1 $aETAYO, J. 700 1 $aTSURYKAU, A. 700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, V. 700 1 $aMUNGAI, P. 700 1 $aDAMM, U. 700 1 $aLI, Q. R. 700 1 $aZHANG, H. 700 1 $aBOONMEE, S. 700 1 $aLU, Y. Z. 700 1 $aBECERRA, A. G. 700 1 $aKENDRICK, B. 700 1 $aBREARLEY, F. Q. 700 1 $aMOTIEJUNAITE, J. 700 1 $aSHARMA, B. 700 1 $aKHARE, R. 700 1 $aGAIKWAD, S. 700 1 $aWIJESUNDARA, D. S. A. 700 1 $aTANG, L. Z. 700 1 $aHE, M. Q. 700 1 $aFLAKUS, A. 700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ-FLAKUS, P. 700 1 $aZHURBENKO, M. P. 700 1 $aMCKENZIE, E. H. C. 700 1 $aSTADLER, M. 700 1 $aBHAT, D. J. 700 1 $aLIU, J. K. 700 1 $aRAZA, M. 700 1 $aJEEWON, R. 700 1 $aNASSONOVA, E. S. 700 1 $aPRIETO, M. 700 1 $aJAYALAL, R. G. U. 700 1 $aERDOGDU, M. 700 1 $aYURKOV, A. 700 1 $aSCHNITTLER, M. 700 1 $aSHCHEPIN, O. N. 700 1 $aNOVOZHILOV, Y. K. 700 1 $aSILVA-FILHO, A. G. S. 700 1 $aGENTEKAKI, E. 700 1 $aLIU, P. 700 1 $aCAVENDER, J. C. 700 1 $aKANG, Y. 700 1 $aMOHAMMAD, S. 700 1 $aZHANG, L. F. 700 1 $aXU, R. F. 700 1 $aLI, Y. M. 700 1 $aDAYARATHNE, M. C. 700 1 $aEKANAYAKA, A. H. 700 1 $aWEN, T. C. 700 1 $aDENG, C. Y. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, O. L. 700 1 $aNAVATHE, S. 700 1 $aHAWKSWORTH, D. L. 700 1 $aFAN, X. L. 700 1 $aDISSANAYAKE, L. S. 700 1 $aKUHNERT, E. 700 1 $aGROSSART, H. P. 700 1 $aTHINES, M. 773 $tMycosphere$gv. 11, n. 1, p. 1060-1456, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
Data corrente: |
18/07/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
11/08/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
PESSOA FILHO, M. A. C. de P.; MARTINS, A. M.; FERREIRA, M. E. |
Afiliação: |
MARCO AURELIO CALDAS DE PINHO PESSO, CPAC; ALEXANDRE MAGALHÃES MARTINS, CAPES; MARCIO ELIAS FERREIRA, SRI. |
Título: |
Molecular dating of phylogenetic divergence between Urochloa species based on complete chloroplast genomes. |
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
BMC Genomics, v. 18, n. 516, 2017. |
Páginas: |
14 p. |
DOI: |
DOI 10.1186/s12864-017-3904-2 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Background: Forage species of Urochloa are planted in millions of hectares of tropical and subtropical pastures in South America. Most of the planted area is covered with four species (U. ruziziensis, U. brizantha, U. decumbens and U. humidicola). Breeding programs rely on interspecific hybridizations to increase genetic diversity and introgress traits of agronomic importance. Knowledge of phylogenetic relationships is important to optimize compatible hybridizations in Urochloa, where phylogeny has been subject of some controversy. We used next-generation sequencing to assemble the chloroplast genomes of four Urochloa species to investigate their phylogenetic relationships, compute their times of divergence and identify chloroplast DNA markers (microsatellites, SNPs and InDels). Results: Whole plastid genome sizes were 138,765 bp in U. ruziziensis, 138,945 bp in U. decumbens, 138,946 bp in U. brizantha and 138,976 bp in U. humidicola. Each Urochloa chloroplast genome contained 130 predicted coding regions and structural features that are typical of Panicoid grasses. U. brizantha and U. decumbens chloroplast sequences are highly similar and show reduced SNP, InDel and SSR polymorphism as compared to U. ruziziensis and U. humidicola. Most of the structural and sequence polymorphisms were located in intergenic regions, and reflected phylogenetic distances between species. Divergence of U. humidicola from a common ancestor with the three other Urochloa species was estimated at 9.46 mya. U. ruziziensis, U. decumbens, and U. brizantha formed a clade where the U. ruziziensis lineage would have diverged by 5.67 mya, followed by a recent divergence event between U. decumbens and U. brizantha around 1.6 mya. Conclusion: Low-coverage Illumina sequencing allowed the successful sequence analysis of plastid genomes in four species of Urochloa used as forages in the tropics. Pairwise sequence comparisons detected multiple microsatellite, SNP and InDel sites prone to be used as molecular markers in genetic analysis of Urochloa. Our results placed the origin of U. humidicola and U. ruziziensis divergence in the Miocene-Pliocene boundary, and the split between U. brizantha and U. decumbens in the Pleistocene. MenosAbstract: Background: Forage species of Urochloa are planted in millions of hectares of tropical and subtropical pastures in South America. Most of the planted area is covered with four species (U. ruziziensis, U. brizantha, U. decumbens and U. humidicola). Breeding programs rely on interspecific hybridizations to increase genetic diversity and introgress traits of agronomic importance. Knowledge of phylogenetic relationships is important to optimize compatible hybridizations in Urochloa, where phylogeny has been subject of some controversy. We used next-generation sequencing to assemble the chloroplast genomes of four Urochloa species to investigate their phylogenetic relationships, compute their times of divergence and identify chloroplast DNA markers (microsatellites, SNPs and InDels). Results: Whole plastid genome sizes were 138,765 bp in U. ruziziensis, 138,945 bp in U. decumbens, 138,946 bp in U. brizantha and 138,976 bp in U. humidicola. Each Urochloa chloroplast genome contained 130 predicted coding regions and structural features that are typical of Panicoid grasses. U. brizantha and U. decumbens chloroplast sequences are highly similar and show reduced SNP, InDel and SSR polymorphism as compared to U. ruziziensis and U. humidicola. Most of the structural and sequence polymorphisms were located in intergenic regions, and reflected phylogenetic distances between species. Divergence of U. humidicola from a common ancestor with the three other Urochloa species was esti... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria; Capim Urochloa; Gramínea Forrageira. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/161894/1/s12864-017-3904-2.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02874naa a2200205 a 4500 001 2072837 005 2017-08-11 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $aDOI 10.1186/s12864-017-3904-2$2DOI 100 1 $aPESSOA FILHO, M. A. C. de P. 245 $aMolecular dating of phylogenetic divergence between Urochloa species based on complete chloroplast genomes.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2017 300 $a14 p. 520 $aAbstract: Background: Forage species of Urochloa are planted in millions of hectares of tropical and subtropical pastures in South America. Most of the planted area is covered with four species (U. ruziziensis, U. brizantha, U. decumbens and U. humidicola). Breeding programs rely on interspecific hybridizations to increase genetic diversity and introgress traits of agronomic importance. Knowledge of phylogenetic relationships is important to optimize compatible hybridizations in Urochloa, where phylogeny has been subject of some controversy. We used next-generation sequencing to assemble the chloroplast genomes of four Urochloa species to investigate their phylogenetic relationships, compute their times of divergence and identify chloroplast DNA markers (microsatellites, SNPs and InDels). Results: Whole plastid genome sizes were 138,765 bp in U. ruziziensis, 138,945 bp in U. decumbens, 138,946 bp in U. brizantha and 138,976 bp in U. humidicola. Each Urochloa chloroplast genome contained 130 predicted coding regions and structural features that are typical of Panicoid grasses. U. brizantha and U. decumbens chloroplast sequences are highly similar and show reduced SNP, InDel and SSR polymorphism as compared to U. ruziziensis and U. humidicola. Most of the structural and sequence polymorphisms were located in intergenic regions, and reflected phylogenetic distances between species. Divergence of U. humidicola from a common ancestor with the three other Urochloa species was estimated at 9.46 mya. U. ruziziensis, U. decumbens, and U. brizantha formed a clade where the U. ruziziensis lineage would have diverged by 5.67 mya, followed by a recent divergence event between U. decumbens and U. brizantha around 1.6 mya. Conclusion: Low-coverage Illumina sequencing allowed the successful sequence analysis of plastid genomes in four species of Urochloa used as forages in the tropics. Pairwise sequence comparisons detected multiple microsatellite, SNP and InDel sites prone to be used as molecular markers in genetic analysis of Urochloa. Our results placed the origin of U. humidicola and U. ruziziensis divergence in the Miocene-Pliocene boundary, and the split between U. brizantha and U. decumbens in the Pleistocene. 650 $aBrachiaria 650 $aCapim Urochloa 650 $aGramínea Forrageira 700 1 $aMARTINS, A. M. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, M. E. 773 $tBMC Genomics$gv. 18, n. 516, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|