Data/hora: 16/06/2024 20:32:38

Biblioteca(s): | Embrapa Solos.
Data corrente: | 24/07/2023
Data da última atualização: | 05/12/2023
Autoria: | MOTA, P. K.; COSTA, A. M. da; PRADO, R. B.; FERNANDES, L. F. S.; PISSARRA, T. C. T.; PACHECO, F. A. L.
Afiliação: | PAULA KAREN MOTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; ADRIANA MONTEIRO DA COSTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; RACHEL BARDY PRADO, CNPS; LUÍS FILIPE SANCHES FERNANDES, UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS-OS-MONTES AND ALTO DOURO; TERESA CRISTINA TARLÉ PISSARRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA; FERNANDO ANTÓNIO LEAL PACHECO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA; UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS-OS-MONTES AND ALTO DOURO.
Título: | Payment for environmental services: a critical review of schemes, concepts, and practice in Brazil.
Ano de publicação: | 2023
Fonte/Imprenta: | Science of the Total Environment, v. 899, 165639, Nov. 2023.
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165639
Idioma: | Inglês
Conteúdo: | The Payment for Environmental Services (PES) is often conceived through complex schemes without a clear definition of all concepts involved. This study presents the results of a systematic literature review on PES schemes in Brazil, accompanied by a critical assessment of their efficacy for potential environmental gains. The PES approaches were grouped into six categories based on the research focus, and those that were focused on PES policies were identified as the most studied. A particular emphasis has been given to the Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes, where the ecosystem services studied were mostly centered on issues related to carbon and water, respectively. Approximately one-third of all schemes provided no clear definition of which ecosystem services are proposed for payment. In addition, the review showed no consensus among studies on the definition of services in similar schemes. Most schemes presented no payment system conditioned on the provision of environmental services. Furthermore, the review showed that the absence of clarity in the application of concepts may hinder the development of public policies to properly implement PES in Brazil. The conclusion is that standardizing terms used in the literature and in PES schemes is critical; therefore, the use of the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) as a reference is recommended to ensure clarity, objectivity and, more importantly, the expected environmental efficacy.
Palavras-Chave: | Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services; Serviços ecossistêmicos.
Thesagro: | Água; Carbono; Políticas Públicas.
Thesaurus Nal: | Carbon; Ecosystem services; Public policy; Water.
Categoria do assunto: | P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra
URL: | http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1155216/1/Payment-for-environmental-services-2023.pdf
Registro original: | Embrapa Solos (CNPS)
Exemplares: | CNPS - (21308-1) - UPC - AP - DD -  -  -  - DIS