| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
| 4. |  | BACILA, D. M.; FEDDERN, V.; MAFRA, L. I.; SCHEUERMANN, G. N.; MOLOGNONI, L.; DAGUER, H. Current research, regulation, risk, analytical methods and monitoring results for nicarbazin in chicken meat: A perspective review. Food Research International, v. 99, p. 31-40, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|    |
| 8. | | MAGENIS, R. B.; DAGUER, H.; PRUDÊNCIO, E. S.; MUÑOZ, I. de B.; STEPHAN, M. P.; EGITO, A. S. do. Detection of adulteration of minas frescal cheese by gel electrophoresis. In: WORLD CONGRESS OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 16.; LATIN AMERICAN SEMINAR OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 17., 2012, Foz do Iguaçu. Addressing global food security and wellness through food science and technology: abstracts. Foz do Iguaçu: ALACCTA, 2012. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
| |
| 9. | | MAGENIS, R. B.; DAGUER, H.; PRUDÊNCIO, E. S.; MUÑOZ, I. de B.; STEPHAN, M. P.; VASCONCELOS, A. S. E. Detection of adulteration of minas frescal cheese by gel electrophoresis. In: WORLD CONGRESS OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 16.; LATIN AMERICAN SEMINAR OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 17., 2012, Foz do Iguaçu. Addressing global food security and wellness through food science and technology: abstracts. Foz do Iguaçu: IUFoST: ALACCTA, 2012. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
| |
| 10. | | BACILA, D. M.; CUNHA JUNIOR, A.; WEBER, I. F.; SCHEUERMANN, G. N.; COLDEBELLA, A.; CARON, L.; MOLOGNONI, L.; DAGUER, H.; MAFRA, L. I.; FEDDERN, V. Degradation of 4,4-Dinitrocarbanilide in chicken breast by thermal processing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, v. 66, p. 8391-8397, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|  |
| 11. | | AROEIRA, C. N.; FEDDERN, V.; GRESSLER, V.; MOLOGNONI, L.; DAGUER, H.; DALLA COSTA, O. A.; LIMA, G. J. M. M. de; CONTRERAS-CASTILL0, C. J. Determination of ractopamine residue in tissues and urine from swine fed meat and bone meal. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, v. 36, n. 3, p. 424-433, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| 12. | | FEDDERN, V.; AROEIRA, C. N.; MOLOGNONI, L.; GRESSLER, V.; DAGUER, H.; DALLA COSTA, O. A.; CASTILLO, C. J. C.; LIMA, G. J. M. M. de. Ractopamine analysis in pig kidney, liver and lungs: a validation of the method scope extension using QuEChERS as a sample preparation step. Journal of Chromatography B, v. 1091, p. 79-86, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
01/11/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
01/11/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
AROEIRA, C. N.; FEDDERN, V.; GRESSLER, V.; MOLOGNONI, L.; DAGUER, H.; DALLA COSTA, O. A.; LIMA, G. J. M. M. de; CONTRERAS-CASTILL0, C. J. |
|
Afiliação: |
CAROLINA N. AROEIRA, ESALQ; VIVIAN FEDDERN, CNPSA; VANESSA GRESSLER, CNPSA; LUCIANO MOLOGNONI, MAPA; HEITOR DAGUER, MAPA; OSMAR ANTONIO DALLA COSTA, CNPSA; GUSTAVO JULIO MELLO M. DE LIMA, CNPSA; CARMEN J. CONTRERAS-CASTILL0, ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Determination of ractopamine residue in tissues and urine from swine fed meat and bone meal. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, v. 36, n. 3, p. 424-433, 2019. |
|
DOI: |
10.1080/19440049.2019.1567942 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: In many countries, ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) is allowed to be used in animal production as a βagonist, which is an energy repartitioning agent able to offer economic benefits such as increased muscle and decreased fat deposition, feed conversion improvement and an increase in average daily weight gain. However, some countries have banned its use and established strict traceability programmes because of pharmacological implications of β-agonist residues in meat products. In Brazil, commercial RAC is controlled (5?20 mg kg−1) and only added to pig diet during the last 28 days before slaughter. However, the control is more difficult when co-products, like meat and bone meal (MBM), which can be produced from RAC treated animals, are part of the feed composition. Therefore, a study was undertaken to evaluate the presence of RAC residue concentrations in urine and tissues of gilts (n = 40) in four dietary groups: 0%, 7%, 14% and 21% (w/w) of MBM-containing RAC (53.5 µg kg−1). The concentration of RAC residues in MBM, pig tissues and urine was determined by LC?MS. Low RAC concentrations were detected in muscle, kidney, liver and lungs (limit of detection = 0.15, 0.5, 0.5 and 1.0 µg kg−1, respectively); however, no RAC residues were quantified above the limit of quantification (0.5, 2.5, 2.5 and 2.5 µg kg−1, respectively). In urine, the RAC concentration remained below 1.35 µg L−1. These data suggest that MBM (containing 53.5 µg kg−1 RAC) added to diet up to 21% (w/w) could hamper the trade where RAC is restricted or has zero-tolerance policy MenosAbstract: In many countries, ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) is allowed to be used in animal production as a βagonist, which is an energy repartitioning agent able to offer economic benefits such as increased muscle and decreased fat deposition, feed conversion improvement and an increase in average daily weight gain. However, some countries have banned its use and established strict traceability programmes because of pharmacological implications of β-agonist residues in meat products. In Brazil, commercial RAC is controlled (5?20 mg kg−1) and only added to pig diet during the last 28 days before slaughter. However, the control is more difficult when co-products, like meat and bone meal (MBM), which can be produced from RAC treated animals, are part of the feed composition. Therefore, a study was undertaken to evaluate the presence of RAC residue concentrations in urine and tissues of gilts (n = 40) in four dietary groups: 0%, 7%, 14% and 21% (w/w) of MBM-containing RAC (53.5 µg kg−1). The concentration of RAC residues in MBM, pig tissues and urine was determined by LC?MS. Low RAC concentrations were detected in muscle, kidney, liver and lungs (limit of detection = 0.15, 0.5, 0.5 and 1.0 µg kg−1, respectively); however, no RAC residues were quantified above the limit of quantification (0.5, 2.5, 2.5 and 2.5 µg kg−1, respectively). In urine, the RAC concentration remained below 1.35 µg L−1. These data suggest that MBM (containing 53.5 µ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Carne de porco; Pig fed meat; Pork production. |
|
Thesagro: |
Carne; Farinha de Osso; Suíno. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Analytical methods; Feed additives; Food safety. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02578naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2113744
005 2019-11-01
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1080/19440049.2019.1567942$2DOI
100 1 $aAROEIRA, C. N.
245 $aDetermination of ractopamine residue in tissues and urine from swine fed meat and bone meal.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aAbstract: In many countries, ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) is allowed to be used in animal production as a βagonist, which is an energy repartitioning agent able to offer economic benefits such as increased muscle and decreased fat deposition, feed conversion improvement and an increase in average daily weight gain. However, some countries have banned its use and established strict traceability programmes because of pharmacological implications of β-agonist residues in meat products. In Brazil, commercial RAC is controlled (5?20 mg kg−1) and only added to pig diet during the last 28 days before slaughter. However, the control is more difficult when co-products, like meat and bone meal (MBM), which can be produced from RAC treated animals, are part of the feed composition. Therefore, a study was undertaken to evaluate the presence of RAC residue concentrations in urine and tissues of gilts (n = 40) in four dietary groups: 0%, 7%, 14% and 21% (w/w) of MBM-containing RAC (53.5 µg kg−1). The concentration of RAC residues in MBM, pig tissues and urine was determined by LC?MS. Low RAC concentrations were detected in muscle, kidney, liver and lungs (limit of detection = 0.15, 0.5, 0.5 and 1.0 µg kg−1, respectively); however, no RAC residues were quantified above the limit of quantification (0.5, 2.5, 2.5 and 2.5 µg kg−1, respectively). In urine, the RAC concentration remained below 1.35 µg L−1. These data suggest that MBM (containing 53.5 µg kg−1 RAC) added to diet up to 21% (w/w) could hamper the trade where RAC is restricted or has zero-tolerance policy
650 $aAnalytical methods
650 $aFeed additives
650 $aFood safety
650 $aCarne
650 $aFarinha de Osso
650 $aSuíno
653 $aCarne de porco
653 $aPig fed meat
653 $aPork production
700 1 $aFEDDERN, V.
700 1 $aGRESSLER, V.
700 1 $aMOLOGNONI, L.
700 1 $aDAGUER, H.
700 1 $aDALLA COSTA, O. A.
700 1 $aLIMA, G. J. M. M. de
700 1 $aCONTRERAS-CASTILL0, C. J.
773 $tFood Additives & Contaminants: Part A$gv. 36, n. 3, p. 424-433, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
