| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/03/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/12/2011 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BUENO, A. de F.; BATISTELA, M. J.; BUENO, R. C. O. de F.; FRANCA-NETO, J. de B.; NISHIKAWA, M. A. N.; LIBÉRIO FILHO, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADENEY DE FREITAS BUENO, CNPSO; MARCELO JOSÉ BATISTELA, FESURV / Monsanto do Brasil; REGIANE CRISTINA DE FREITAS BUENO, FESURV; JOSE DE BARROS FRANCA NETO, CNPSO; MARCELO AKITA NAIME NISHIKAWA, Monsanto do Brasil; ADEONE LIBÉRIO FILHO, Universidade Católica de Goiás. |
|
Título: |
Effects of integrated pest management, biological control and prophylactic use os insecticides on the management and sustainability of soybean. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Protection, v. 30, n. 7, p. 937-945, jul. 2011. |
|
DOI: |
10.1016/J.CROPRO.2011.02.021 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed to evaluate the prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI) in comparison with integrated pest management (IPM) and biological control (BC) strategies. Five replicated experiments were carried out independently in two Brazilian soybean-producing states, Goiás and Paraná, where those pestcontrol strategies were evaluated during two consecutive growing seasons. The evaluated treatments were integrated pest management (IPM); prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI), a practice that has been increasingly adopted by soybean growers in Brazil as well as in other Latin American countries; biological control (BC) and the control (C), which involved no pest treatment. Although the pest infestation rates in the BC and IPM treatments were higher than that in the PUI treatment, crop productivity, in general, was similar among these treatments and differed only from the control with no pest treatment. These results indicate that the prophylactic use of insecticides on soybeans does not result in higher productivity in the field and that this practice merely requires larger amounts of pesticides, which can impair the sustainability of the soybean crop. Therefore, the use of IPM still remains the best alternative for pest management in soybean fields. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Manejo integrado de pragas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle integrado; Praga de planta; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Integrated pest management; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02118naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1881499
005 2011-12-08
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/J.CROPRO.2011.02.021$2DOI
100 1 $aBUENO, A. de F.
245 $aEffects of integrated pest management, biological control and prophylactic use os insecticides on the management and sustainability of soybean.
260 $c2011
520 $aThis study aimed to evaluate the prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI) in comparison with integrated pest management (IPM) and biological control (BC) strategies. Five replicated experiments were carried out independently in two Brazilian soybean-producing states, Goiás and Paraná, where those pestcontrol strategies were evaluated during two consecutive growing seasons. The evaluated treatments were integrated pest management (IPM); prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI), a practice that has been increasingly adopted by soybean growers in Brazil as well as in other Latin American countries; biological control (BC) and the control (C), which involved no pest treatment. Although the pest infestation rates in the BC and IPM treatments were higher than that in the PUI treatment, crop productivity, in general, was similar among these treatments and differed only from the control with no pest treatment. These results indicate that the prophylactic use of insecticides on soybeans does not result in higher productivity in the field and that this practice merely requires larger amounts of pesticides, which can impair the sustainability of the soybean crop. Therefore, the use of IPM still remains the best alternative for pest management in soybean fields.
650 $aIntegrated pest management
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aControle integrado
650 $aPraga de planta
650 $aSoja
653 $aManejo integrado de pragas
700 1 $aBATISTELA, M. J.
700 1 $aBUENO, R. C. O. de F.
700 1 $aFRANCA-NETO, J. de B.
700 1 $aNISHIKAWA, M. A. N.
700 1 $aLIBÉRIO FILHO, A.
773 $tCrop Protection$gv. 30, n. 7, p. 937-945, jul. 2011.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/03/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/08/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 4 |
|
Autoria: |
DUDAS, R. T.; DEMETRIO, W. C.; MAIA, L. S.; SÁTIRO, J. N. O.; SILVA, K. A.; NICOLA, V. B.; KILLE, P.; OLIVEIRA, C. M. R.; AFONSO, R. O.; RUSSELL, G.; FERREIRA, N. G. C.; CUNHA, L.; BROWN, G. G.; BARTZ, M. L. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAFAELA T. DUDAS, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; WILIAN C. DEMETRIO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; LILIANE S. MAIA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; JOSÉ N. O. SÁTIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; KARLO A. SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; VITORIA B. NICOLA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; PETER KILLE, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; CINTÍA M. R. OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; RITA O. AFONSO, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; GEORGINA RUSSELL, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; NUNO G. C. FERREIRA, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; LUIS CUNHA, UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; MARIE L. C. BARTZ, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO. |
|
Título: |
Earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage systems and secondary forest fragments in Paraná, Southern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Zootaxa, v. 5255, n. 1, p. 347-361, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5255.1.28 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and 67 in SF). The highest earthworm abundance was in Faxinal (123 individuals), with 76 individuals in NTS and 47 in SF. In Mauá da Serra the same pattern was observed (SF>NTS), while in Palmeira in overall, fewer individuals (38) were collected (24 in NTS and 14 in SF). The NTS at Faxinal and SF Mauá da Serra in 2019 had only/more exotic/cosmopolitan species, while at the other dates and sites >50% of the specimens sampled were native species. Overall, forests had more native species than exotics: in 2018, natives represented > 75% of all specimens, but in 2019 both Faxinal and Mauá da Serra had more exotic species (> 65%), while at Palmeira, they represented 50% of the individuals. Earthworm total biomass for forest sites was higher in Faxinal (3.2 g) and NTS in Mauá da Serra (1.7 g) in 2019. Overall, the total biomass was higher in SF sites than NTS. Using a classification available for earthworm populations in no-tillage systems, all three sites were considered to have poor quality in terms of abundance (ind m-2), while for species richness, they were considered to have moderate (Faxinal and Mauá da Serra) and good quality (Palmeira). MenosThe area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Conservation agriculture; Ecosystem engineer; Soil macrofauna. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação do Solo; Ecossistema; Fertilidade do Solo; Minhoca. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Earthworms; Oligochaeta. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03816naa a2200397 a 4500
001 2152915
005 2023-08-17
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5255.1.28$2DOI
100 1 $aDUDAS, R. T.
245 $aEarthworm communities in long-term no-tillage systems and secondary forest fragments in Paraná, Southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aThe area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and 67 in SF). The highest earthworm abundance was in Faxinal (123 individuals), with 76 individuals in NTS and 47 in SF. In Mauá da Serra the same pattern was observed (SF>NTS), while in Palmeira in overall, fewer individuals (38) were collected (24 in NTS and 14 in SF). The NTS at Faxinal and SF Mauá da Serra in 2019 had only/more exotic/cosmopolitan species, while at the other dates and sites >50% of the specimens sampled were native species. Overall, forests had more native species than exotics: in 2018, natives represented > 75% of all specimens, but in 2019 both Faxinal and Mauá da Serra had more exotic species (> 65%), while at Palmeira, they represented 50% of the individuals. Earthworm total biomass for forest sites was higher in Faxinal (3.2 g) and NTS in Mauá da Serra (1.7 g) in 2019. Overall, the total biomass was higher in SF sites than NTS. Using a classification available for earthworm populations in no-tillage systems, all three sites were considered to have poor quality in terms of abundance (ind m-2), while for species richness, they were considered to have moderate (Faxinal and Mauá da Serra) and good quality (Palmeira).
650 $aEarthworms
650 $aOligochaeta
650 $aConservação do Solo
650 $aEcossistema
650 $aFertilidade do Solo
650 $aMinhoca
653 $aConservation agriculture
653 $aEcosystem engineer
653 $aSoil macrofauna
700 1 $aDEMETRIO, W. C.
700 1 $aMAIA, L. S.
700 1 $aSÁTIRO, J. N. O.
700 1 $aSILVA, K. A.
700 1 $aNICOLA, V. B.
700 1 $aKILLE, P.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, C. M. R.
700 1 $aAFONSO, R. O.
700 1 $aRUSSELL, G.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, N. G. C.
700 1 $aCUNHA, L.
700 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
700 1 $aBARTZ, M. L. C.
773 $tZootaxa$gv. 5255, n. 1, p. 347-361, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
