| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/02/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/03/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
BOAVENTURA, H. A.; QUINTELA, E. D.; NORONHA JUNIOR, N. C. de; PONTES, R. G. M. S. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
HELOIZA ALVES BOAVENTURA, Unievangélica; ELIANE DIAS QUINTELA, CNPAF; NEWTON CAVALCANTI DE NORONHA JUNIOR, CNPAF; ROSE GOMES MONNERAT SOLON DE PONTES, CENARGEN. |
|
Título: |
Avaliação da eficiência do "Bt caseiro" no controle de lagartas de Helicoverpa armigera. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SEMINÁRIO JOVENS TALENTOS, 9., 2015, Santo Antônio de Goiás. Coletânea dos resumos apresentados. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 2015. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 17. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Documentos, 309). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Este trabalho foi conduzido para fornecer subsídios aos produtores em relação a produção de esporos de B. thuringiensis e à eficiência deste ?Bt caseiro? para o controle de lagartas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bacillus thuringiensis; Bactéria; Lagarta; Praga de planta. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Helicoverpa armigera. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/139390/1/p17.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01023nam a2200229 a 4500
001 2037635
005 2019-03-20
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBOAVENTURA, H. A.
245 $aAvaliação da eficiência do "Bt caseiro" no controle de lagartas de Helicoverpa armigera.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: SEMINÁRIO JOVENS TALENTOS, 9., 2015, Santo Antônio de Goiás. Coletânea dos resumos apresentados. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão$c2015
300 $ap. 17.
490 $a(Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Documentos, 309).
520 $aEste trabalho foi conduzido para fornecer subsídios aos produtores em relação a produção de esporos de B. thuringiensis e à eficiência deste ?Bt caseiro? para o controle de lagartas.
650 $aHelicoverpa armigera
650 $aBacillus thuringiensis
650 $aBactéria
650 $aLagarta
650 $aPraga de planta
700 1 $aQUINTELA, E. D.
700 1 $aNORONHA JUNIOR, N. C. de
700 1 $aPONTES, R. G. M. S. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/03/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/03/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
BORGHI, E.; CRUSCIOL, C. A. C.; NASCENTE, A. S.; MATEUS, G. P.; MARTINS, P. O.; COSTA, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
EMERSON BORGHI, CNPASA; CARLOS ALEXANDRE COSTA CRUSCIOL, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; ADRIANO STEPHAN NASCENTE, CNPAF; GUSTAVO PAVAN MATEUS, APTA; PRISCILA OLIVEIRA MARTINS, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; CINIRO COSTA, UNESP, Botucatu-SP. |
|
Título: |
Effects of row spacing and intercrop on maize grain yield and forage production of palisade grass. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop & Pasture Science, Victoria, v. 63, n. 12, p. 1106-1113, 2012. |
|
DOI: |
dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP12344 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) with perennial forage, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf], provides large amounts of biomass that can be used as straw for no-tillage systems or as pasture for animal grazing. In addition, the use of narrow row spacing may increase maize grain yield. However, it is important to evaluate intercrops at different row spacing to avoid reductions in both maize and forage biomass production. The objectives of this field experiment during two growing seasons in Brazil were as follows: (1) to evaluate the influence of intercropping and row spacing on maize yield, leaf nutrient concentration, and plant population and development; and (2) to assess the influence of row spacing on palisade grass herbage mass and leaf nutrient concentration. The experimental design was a randomised complete block design in a 22 factorial scheme, with eight replications. The treatments comprised two row spacing distances (0.45 and 0.90 m) and two crop management types (maize monoculture and intercropped with palisade grass). The nutrient concentrations in the leaves of the maize plants were in the ideal range for this crop under all conditions studied. Plant height, height of first ear, and number of grains per ear were higher with the narrow row spacing. Maize grain yield was similar in both crop management types (10 301 and 9745 kg ha?1 for monoculture maize and intercropped, respectively). However, maize grain yield at the narrow row spacing was higher than that obtained with the wide row spacing
(9948 v. 8905 kg ha?1). In contrast, row spacing did not affect the nutrient level or quality (crude protein concentration) of palisade grass. The amount of dry matter (DM) from palisade grass was lower at maize harvesting (4.7Mgha?1) and 90 days after harvesting (6.9Mgha?1) under narrow spacing. However, the amount of DM was similar at both row spacings at 120 days after maize harvesting (9.2Mgha?1).Whenthere is no problem with water and nutrient availability, the use of maize and palisade grass intercropping under both row spacing conditions (0.45 and 0.90 m) provides an option for the production of forage DM without reducing the maize grain yield. MenosIntercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) with perennial forage, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf], provides large amounts of biomass that can be used as straw for no-tillage systems or as pasture for animal grazing. In addition, the use of narrow row spacing may increase maize grain yield. However, it is important to evaluate intercrops at different row spacing to avoid reductions in both maize and forage biomass production. The objectives of this field experiment during two growing seasons in Brazil were as follows: (1) to evaluate the influence of intercropping and row spacing on maize yield, leaf nutrient concentration, and plant population and development; and (2) to assess the influence of row spacing on palisade grass herbage mass and leaf nutrient concentration. The experimental design was a randomised complete block design in a 22 factorial scheme, with eight replications. The treatments comprised two row spacing distances (0.45 and 0.90 m) and two crop management types (maize monoculture and intercropped with palisade grass). The nutrient concentrations in the leaves of the maize plants were in the ideal range for this crop under all conditions studied. Plant height, height of first ear, and number of grains per ear were higher with the narrow row spacing. Maize grain yield was similar in both crop management types (10 301 and 9745 kg ha?1 for monoculture maize and intercropped, respectively). However, maize grain yield at the narr... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura sustentável; Brachiaria brizantha; Cultivo intercalado; Espaçamento; Milho; Planta forrageira; Zea Mays. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Corn; Forage production; Row spacing; Sustainable agriculture; Urochloa brizantha. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03198naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1953141
005 2013-03-15
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $adx.doi.org/10.1071/CP12344$2DOI
100 1 $aBORGHI, E.
245 $aEffects of row spacing and intercrop on maize grain yield and forage production of palisade grass.
260 $c2012
520 $aIntercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) with perennial forage, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf], provides large amounts of biomass that can be used as straw for no-tillage systems or as pasture for animal grazing. In addition, the use of narrow row spacing may increase maize grain yield. However, it is important to evaluate intercrops at different row spacing to avoid reductions in both maize and forage biomass production. The objectives of this field experiment during two growing seasons in Brazil were as follows: (1) to evaluate the influence of intercropping and row spacing on maize yield, leaf nutrient concentration, and plant population and development; and (2) to assess the influence of row spacing on palisade grass herbage mass and leaf nutrient concentration. The experimental design was a randomised complete block design in a 22 factorial scheme, with eight replications. The treatments comprised two row spacing distances (0.45 and 0.90 m) and two crop management types (maize monoculture and intercropped with palisade grass). The nutrient concentrations in the leaves of the maize plants were in the ideal range for this crop under all conditions studied. Plant height, height of first ear, and number of grains per ear were higher with the narrow row spacing. Maize grain yield was similar in both crop management types (10 301 and 9745 kg ha?1 for monoculture maize and intercropped, respectively). However, maize grain yield at the narrow row spacing was higher than that obtained with the wide row spacing (9948 v. 8905 kg ha?1). In contrast, row spacing did not affect the nutrient level or quality (crude protein concentration) of palisade grass. The amount of dry matter (DM) from palisade grass was lower at maize harvesting (4.7Mgha?1) and 90 days after harvesting (6.9Mgha?1) under narrow spacing. However, the amount of DM was similar at both row spacings at 120 days after maize harvesting (9.2Mgha?1).Whenthere is no problem with water and nutrient availability, the use of maize and palisade grass intercropping under both row spacing conditions (0.45 and 0.90 m) provides an option for the production of forage DM without reducing the maize grain yield.
650 $aCorn
650 $aForage production
650 $aRow spacing
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aUrochloa brizantha
650 $aAgricultura sustentável
650 $aBrachiaria brizantha
650 $aCultivo intercalado
650 $aEspaçamento
650 $aMilho
650 $aPlanta forrageira
650 $aZea Mays
700 1 $aCRUSCIOL, C. A. C.
700 1 $aNASCENTE, A. S.
700 1 $aMATEUS, G. P.
700 1 $aMARTINS, P. O.
700 1 $aCOSTA, C.
773 $tCrop & Pasture Science, Victoria$gv. 63, n. 12, p. 1106-1113, 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
