| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1.933 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1.933 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/07/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MOTA, P. K.; COSTA, A. M. da; PRADO, R. B.; FERNANDES, L. F. S.; PISSARRA, T. C. T.; PACHECO, F. A. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
PAULA KAREN MOTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; ADRIANA MONTEIRO DA COSTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; RACHEL BARDY PRADO, CNPS; LUÍS FILIPE SANCHES FERNANDES, UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS-OS-MONTES AND ALTO DOURO; TERESA CRISTINA TARLÉ PISSARRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA; FERNANDO ANTÓNIO LEAL PACHECO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA; UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS-OS-MONTES AND ALTO DOURO. |
|
Título: |
Payment for environmental services: a critical review of schemes, concepts, and practice in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Science of the Total Environment, v. 899, 165639, Nov. 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165639 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The Payment for Environmental Services (PES) is often conceived through complex schemes without a clear definition of all concepts involved. This study presents the results of a systematic literature review on PES schemes in Brazil, accompanied by a critical assessment of their efficacy for potential environmental gains. The PES approaches were grouped into six categories based on the research focus, and those that were focused on PES policies were identified as the most studied. A particular emphasis has been given to the Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes, where the ecosystem services studied were mostly centered on issues related to carbon and water, respectively. Approximately one-third of all schemes provided no clear definition of which ecosystem services are proposed for payment. In addition, the review showed no consensus among studies on the definition of services in similar schemes. Most schemes presented no payment system conditioned on the provision of environmental services. Furthermore, the review showed that the absence of clarity in the application of concepts may hinder the development of public policies to properly implement PES in Brazil. The conclusion is that standardizing terms used in the literature and in PES schemes is critical; therefore, the use of the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) as a reference is recommended to ensure clarity, objectivity and, more importantly, the expected environmental efficacy. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services; Serviços ecossistêmicos. |
|
Thesagro: |
Água; Carbono; Políticas Públicas. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Carbon; Ecosystem services; Public policy; Water. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1155216/1/Payment-for-environmental-services-2023.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02433naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2155216
005 2023-12-05
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165639$2DOI
100 1 $aMOTA, P. K.
245 $aPayment for environmental services$ba critical review of schemes, concepts, and practice in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aThe Payment for Environmental Services (PES) is often conceived through complex schemes without a clear definition of all concepts involved. This study presents the results of a systematic literature review on PES schemes in Brazil, accompanied by a critical assessment of their efficacy for potential environmental gains. The PES approaches were grouped into six categories based on the research focus, and those that were focused on PES policies were identified as the most studied. A particular emphasis has been given to the Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes, where the ecosystem services studied were mostly centered on issues related to carbon and water, respectively. Approximately one-third of all schemes provided no clear definition of which ecosystem services are proposed for payment. In addition, the review showed no consensus among studies on the definition of services in similar schemes. Most schemes presented no payment system conditioned on the provision of environmental services. Furthermore, the review showed that the absence of clarity in the application of concepts may hinder the development of public policies to properly implement PES in Brazil. The conclusion is that standardizing terms used in the literature and in PES schemes is critical; therefore, the use of the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) as a reference is recommended to ensure clarity, objectivity and, more importantly, the expected environmental efficacy.
650 $aCarbon
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aPublic policy
650 $aWater
650 $aÁgua
650 $aCarbono
650 $aPolíticas Públicas
653 $aCommon International Classification of Ecosystem Services
653 $aServiços ecossistêmicos
700 1 $aCOSTA, A. M. da
700 1 $aPRADO, R. B.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, L. F. S.
700 1 $aPISSARRA, T. C. T.
700 1 $aPACHECO, F. A. L.
773 $tScience of the Total Environment$gv. 899, 165639, Nov. 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
