|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
10/11/2014 |
Data da última atualização: |
06/03/2015 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
PIVA, J. T.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ZANATTA, J. A.; MORAES, A. de; TOMAZI, M.; PAULETTI, V.; BARTH, G.; PICCOLO, M. de C. |
Afiliação: |
JONATAS TIAGO PIVA, UFPR; JEFERSON DIECKOW, UFPR; CIMÉLIO BAYER, UFRGS; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; ANIBAL DE MORAES, UFPR; MICHELY TOMAZI, UFRGS; VOLNEI PAULETTI, UFPR; GABRIEL BARTH, Fundação ABC para Assistência Técnica Agropecuária; MARISA DE CASSIA PICCOLO, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura/USP. |
Título: |
Soil gaseous N2O and CH4 emissions and carbon pool due to integrated crop-livestock in a subtropical Ferralsol. |
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 87-93, 2014. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
We assessed the impact of integrated crop-livestock (CL), with silage maize (Zea mays L.) in summerand grazed annual-ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) in winter, and continuous crop (CC), with annual-ryegrass used only as cover-crop, on net greenhouse gas emission from soil (NetGHG-S) in a subtropicalFerralsol of a 3.5-year-old experiment in Brazil. Emissions from animal excreta in CL were estimated.Soil N2O fluxes after N application to maize were higher in CL (max. 181 g N2O-N m−2h−1) than in CC(max. 132 g N2O-N m−2h−1). The cumulative annual N2O emission from soil in CL surpassed that in CCby more than three-times (4.26 vs. 1.26 kg N2O-N ha−1, p < 0.01), possibly because of supplementary Napplication to grazed ryegrass in CL (N was not applied in cover-crop ryegrass of CC) and a certain degreeof soil compaction visually observed in the first few centimetres after grazing. The estimated annual N2Oemission from excreta in CL was 2.35 kg N2O-N ha−1. Cumulative annual CH4emission was not affectedsignificantly (1.65 in CL vs. 1.08 kg CH4-C ha−1in CC, p = 0.27). Soil organic carbon (OC) stocks were notaffected by soil use systems, neither in 0?20-cm (67.88 in CL vs. 67.20 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.62) or 0?100-cm (234.74 in CL vs. 234.61 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.97). The NetGHG-S was 0.652 Mg CO2-Ceqha−1year−1higher in CL than in CC. Crop-livestock emitted more N2O than CC and no soil OC sequestration occurredto offset that emission. Management of fertiliser- and excreta-N must be focused as a strategy to mitigate NO2 fluxes in CL. MenosWe assessed the impact of integrated crop-livestock (CL), with silage maize (Zea mays L.) in summerand grazed annual-ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) in winter, and continuous crop (CC), with annual-ryegrass used only as cover-crop, on net greenhouse gas emission from soil (NetGHG-S) in a subtropicalFerralsol of a 3.5-year-old experiment in Brazil. Emissions from animal excreta in CL were estimated.Soil N2O fluxes after N application to maize were higher in CL (max. 181 g N2O-N m−2h−1) than in CC(max. 132 g N2O-N m−2h−1). The cumulative annual N2O emission from soil in CL surpassed that in CCby more than three-times (4.26 vs. 1.26 kg N2O-N ha−1, p < 0.01), possibly because of supplementary Napplication to grazed ryegrass in CL (N was not applied in cover-crop ryegrass of CC) and a certain degreeof soil compaction visually observed in the first few centimetres after grazing. The estimated annual N2Oemission from excreta in CL was 2.35 kg N2O-N ha−1. Cumulative annual CH4emission was not affectedsignificantly (1.65 in CL vs. 1.08 kg CH4-C ha−1in CC, p = 0.27). Soil organic carbon (OC) stocks were notaffected by soil use systems, neither in 0?20-cm (67.88 in CL vs. 67.20 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.62) or 0?100-cm (234.74 in CL vs. 234.61 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.97). The NetGHG-S was 0.652 Mg CO2-Ceqha−1year−1higher in CL than in CC. Crop-livestock emitted more N2O than CC and no soil OC sequestration occurredto offset tha... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Aquecimento global; Dairy livestock; Fertilização; Global warming mitigation; Mitigação; Subtropical soil. |
Thesagro: |
Gado; Solo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- A Sistemas de Cultivo |
Marc: |
LEADER 02483naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1999593 005 2015-03-06 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPIVA, J. T. 245 $aSoil gaseous N2O and CH4 emissions and carbon pool due to integrated crop-livestock in a subtropical Ferralsol. 260 $c2014 520 $aWe assessed the impact of integrated crop-livestock (CL), with silage maize (Zea mays L.) in summerand grazed annual-ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) in winter, and continuous crop (CC), with annual-ryegrass used only as cover-crop, on net greenhouse gas emission from soil (NetGHG-S) in a subtropicalFerralsol of a 3.5-year-old experiment in Brazil. Emissions from animal excreta in CL were estimated.Soil N2O fluxes after N application to maize were higher in CL (max. 181 g N2O-N m−2h−1) than in CC(max. 132 g N2O-N m−2h−1). The cumulative annual N2O emission from soil in CL surpassed that in CCby more than three-times (4.26 vs. 1.26 kg N2O-N ha−1, p < 0.01), possibly because of supplementary Napplication to grazed ryegrass in CL (N was not applied in cover-crop ryegrass of CC) and a certain degreeof soil compaction visually observed in the first few centimetres after grazing. The estimated annual N2Oemission from excreta in CL was 2.35 kg N2O-N ha−1. Cumulative annual CH4emission was not affectedsignificantly (1.65 in CL vs. 1.08 kg CH4-C ha−1in CC, p = 0.27). Soil organic carbon (OC) stocks were notaffected by soil use systems, neither in 0?20-cm (67.88 in CL vs. 67.20 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.62) or 0?100-cm (234.74 in CL vs. 234.61 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.97). The NetGHG-S was 0.652 Mg CO2-Ceqha−1year−1higher in CL than in CC. Crop-livestock emitted more N2O than CC and no soil OC sequestration occurredto offset that emission. Management of fertiliser- and excreta-N must be focused as a strategy to mitigate NO2 fluxes in CL. 650 $aGado 650 $aSolo 653 $aAquecimento global 653 $aDairy livestock 653 $aFertilização 653 $aGlobal warming mitigation 653 $aMitigação 653 $aSubtropical soil 700 1 $aDIECKOW, J. 700 1 $aBAYER, C. 700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A. 700 1 $aMORAES, A. de 700 1 $aTOMAZI, M. 700 1 $aPAULETTI, V. 700 1 $aBARTH, G. 700 1 $aPICCOLO, M. de C. 773 $tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment$gv. 190, p. 87-93, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
Data corrente: |
03/01/2023 |
Data da última atualização: |
03/01/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
KAVAMURA, V. N.; CLARK, I. M.; MELO, I. S. de; MAUCHLINE, T. H. |
Afiliação: |
VANESSA NESSNER KAVAMURA, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.; IAN M. CLARK, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.; ITAMAR SOARES DE MELO, CNPMA; TIM MAUCHLINE, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK. |
Título: |
Insights into the rhizosphere microbiome: past and future perspectives |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: PLANT MICROBIOME SYMPOSIUM, 3., 2022, Dundee. Abstracts... Dundee, Scotland: 2022. Ref. S1.K2. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Microorganisms associated to plants can promote plant growth and development through direct and/or indirect mechanisms in addition to enabling them to tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses. Several factors are responsible for shaping the microbiome associated with plants and understanding how they influence the structure and functions of microbial communities is crucial for the development of sustainable agriculture. Using culture-independent methods and soils from Rothamsted Research, I will describe the importance of different factors in determining the root microbiome structure and diversity in wheat. In addition, I will describe a culturedependent approach that led to the development of a microbial product for maize. I also discuss gaps and benefits of taking a multidisciplinary approach to explore the plant microbiome to generate microorganism-based solutions for sustainable intensification of crop production. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Microbiome; Rhizosphere. |
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1150579/1/RA-MeloIS-3rd-Plant-Microbiome-Symposium-Ref-S1.K2.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01477nam a2200169 a 4500 001 2150579 005 2023-01-03 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aKAVAMURA, V. N. 245 $aInsights into the rhizosphere microbiome$bpast and future perspectives$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: PLANT MICROBIOME SYMPOSIUM, 3., 2022, Dundee. Abstracts... Dundee, Scotland: 2022. Ref. S1.K2.$c2022 520 $aMicroorganisms associated to plants can promote plant growth and development through direct and/or indirect mechanisms in addition to enabling them to tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses. Several factors are responsible for shaping the microbiome associated with plants and understanding how they influence the structure and functions of microbial communities is crucial for the development of sustainable agriculture. Using culture-independent methods and soils from Rothamsted Research, I will describe the importance of different factors in determining the root microbiome structure and diversity in wheat. In addition, I will describe a culturedependent approach that led to the development of a microbial product for maize. I also discuss gaps and benefits of taking a multidisciplinary approach to explore the plant microbiome to generate microorganism-based solutions for sustainable intensification of crop production. 650 $aMicrobiome 650 $aRhizosphere 700 1 $aCLARK, I. M. 700 1 $aMELO, I. S. de 700 1 $aMAUCHLINE, T. H.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|