| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/06/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/02/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
GIL, J. D. B.; GARRETT, R. D.; ROTZ, A.; DAIOGLOU, V.; VALENTIM, J. F.; PIRES, G. F.; COSTA, M. H.; LOPES, L. B.; REIS, J. C. dos. |
|
Afiliação: |
JULIANA DIAS BERNARDES GIL, WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY; RACHAEL D. GARRETT, BOSTON UNIVERSITY; ALAN ROTZ, USDA-ARS; VASSILIS DAIOGLOU, UTRECHT UNIVERSITY; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-AC; GABRIELLE F. PIRES, UFV; MARCOS H. COSTA, UFV; LUCIANO BASTOS LOPES, CPAMT; JULIO CESAR DOS REIS, CPAMT. |
|
Título: |
Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Research Letters, v. 13, n. 6, 064025, 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Low productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity and financial returns). All systems suffered productivity and profitability losses under severe climate change, highlighting the need for climate smart agricultural development strategies in the region. By underscoring the economic feasibility of improving the performance of cattle systems, and by quantifying the tradeoffs of each option, our results are useful for directing agricultural and climate policy. MenosLow productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultura sustentable; Deforestación; Efecto invernadero; Ganado bovino; Pecuária extensiva; Reducción de riesgos; Sistemas agrícolas integrados. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Sustentável; Criação Extensiva; Desmatamento; Efeito Estufa; Impacto Ambiental; Pecuária; Redução; Sistema de Pastejo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Agricultural management models; Amazonia; Cattle; Climate; Climate models; Deforestation; Environmental impact; Environmental sustainability; Extensive farming; Greenhouse effect; Greenhouse gas emissions; Integrated agricultural systems; Integrated crop management; Land; Livestock; Pastures; Risk reduction; Sustainable agricultural intensification; Sustainable agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/192496/1/2018-cpamt-luciano-lopes-tradeoffs-quest-climate-smart-agricultural-intensification-mato-grosso.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/178393/1/26625.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03719naa a2200625 a 4500
001 2105798
005 2019-02-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGIL, J. D. B.
245 $aTradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aLow productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity and financial returns). All systems suffered productivity and profitability losses under severe climate change, highlighting the need for climate smart agricultural development strategies in the region. By underscoring the economic feasibility of improving the performance of cattle systems, and by quantifying the tradeoffs of each option, our results are useful for directing agricultural and climate policy.
650 $aAgricultural management models
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aCattle
650 $aClimate
650 $aClimate models
650 $aDeforestation
650 $aEnvironmental impact
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aExtensive farming
650 $aGreenhouse effect
650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions
650 $aIntegrated agricultural systems
650 $aIntegrated crop management
650 $aLand
650 $aLivestock
650 $aPastures
650 $aRisk reduction
650 $aSustainable agricultural intensification
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aAgricultura Sustentável
650 $aCriação Extensiva
650 $aDesmatamento
650 $aEfeito Estufa
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
650 $aPecuária
650 $aRedução
650 $aSistema de Pastejo
653 $aAgricultura sustentable
653 $aDeforestación
653 $aEfecto invernadero
653 $aGanado bovino
653 $aPecuária extensiva
653 $aReducción de riesgos
653 $aSistemas agrícolas integrados
700 1 $aGARRETT, R. D.
700 1 $aROTZ, A.
700 1 $aDAIOGLOU, V.
700 1 $aVALENTIM, J. F.
700 1 $aPIRES, G. F.
700 1 $aCOSTA, M. H.
700 1 $aLOPES, L. B.
700 1 $aREIS, J. C. dos
773 $tEnvironmental Research Letters$gv. 13, n. 6, 064025, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Territorial. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/06/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
VILELA, G. F.; FARIAS, A. R.; PAIM, F. A. de P.; CASTRO, G. S. A.; OSHIRO, O. T.; CARVALHO, C. A. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
GISELE FREITAS VILELA, CNPM; ANDRE RODRIGO FARIAS, CNPM; FERNANDO ANTONIO DE PADUA PAIM, CNPM; GUSTAVO SPADOTTI AMARAL CASTRO, CNPM; OSVALDO TADATOMO OSHIRO, CNPM; CARLOS ALBERTO DE CARVALHO, CNPM. |
|
Título: |
Cerrado: Agricultural Production and Areas Desinated for Environmental Preservation Registered in the Brazilian Rural Environmental Registry (Cadastro Ambiental Rural). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, v. 9, n. 3, 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
87-107 |
|
ISBN: |
2162-5271 |
|
DOI: |
10.17265/2162-5263/2020.03.001 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In this study, authors analyzed value, production and area used for producing Cerrado?s main agricultural products, and data on the farms located within this biome and registered in CAR up until April 2019, by microregion. The territory considered here comprised all microregions with at least 25% of its area covered by the Cerrado biome. The production, agricultural production, and planted area values used were the averages of the 2015 to 2017 harvests, and are shown in graphs and tables, as are maps of planted areas and groups of main annual crops, semi-perennial and perennial crops. The areas designated for environmental preservation (ADPs) are the result of the sum of permanent preservation areas (APP), legal reserves (RL) and additional vegetation areas within the farms. Authors? study shows that most of Brazilian cotton, eucalyptus for charcoal, orange, sugarcane, maize and soybean are produced in Cerrado, that 28% of Cerrado are ADPs within farms, and that 16% are areas planted with cotton, eucalyptus, orange, sugarcane, maize, soybean, coffee, beans, and potatoes. The territory occupied by agricultural areas and ADPs required by the Brazilian Forest Code shows that agricultural production and environmental preservation do coexist, and gather the maintenance of essential ecosystem services provided by the ADPs together with the development of the country?s relevant agricultural production. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural production; Brazilian Forest Code; Brazilian Rural Environmental Registry; Environmental preservation. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cerrado. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/214260/1/5247.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02363naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2123502
005 2020-06-29
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2162-5271
024 7 $a10.17265/2162-5263/2020.03.001$2DOI
100 1 $aVILELA, G. F.
245 $aCerrado$bAgricultural Production and Areas Desinated for Environmental Preservation Registered in the Brazilian Rural Environmental Registry (Cadastro Ambiental Rural).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $a87-107
520 $aIn this study, authors analyzed value, production and area used for producing Cerrado?s main agricultural products, and data on the farms located within this biome and registered in CAR up until April 2019, by microregion. The territory considered here comprised all microregions with at least 25% of its area covered by the Cerrado biome. The production, agricultural production, and planted area values used were the averages of the 2015 to 2017 harvests, and are shown in graphs and tables, as are maps of planted areas and groups of main annual crops, semi-perennial and perennial crops. The areas designated for environmental preservation (ADPs) are the result of the sum of permanent preservation areas (APP), legal reserves (RL) and additional vegetation areas within the farms. Authors? study shows that most of Brazilian cotton, eucalyptus for charcoal, orange, sugarcane, maize and soybean are produced in Cerrado, that 28% of Cerrado are ADPs within farms, and that 16% are areas planted with cotton, eucalyptus, orange, sugarcane, maize, soybean, coffee, beans, and potatoes. The territory occupied by agricultural areas and ADPs required by the Brazilian Forest Code shows that agricultural production and environmental preservation do coexist, and gather the maintenance of essential ecosystem services provided by the ADPs together with the development of the country?s relevant agricultural production.
650 $aCerrado
653 $aAgricultural production
653 $aBrazilian Forest Code
653 $aBrazilian Rural Environmental Registry
653 $aEnvironmental preservation
700 1 $aFARIAS, A. R.
700 1 $aPAIM, F. A. de P.
700 1 $aCASTRO, G. S. A.
700 1 $aOSHIRO, O. T.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, C. A. de
773 $tJournal of Environmental Science and Engineering$gv. 9, n. 3, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Territorial (CNPM) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
