| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/05/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/05/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
PILON, L.; SPRICIGO, P. C.; MOURA, M. R. de; MIRANDA, M.; CARMELO, L. G. P.; MATTOSO, L. H. C.; FERREIRA, M. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUIZ HENRIQUE CAPPARELLI MATTOSO, CNPDIA; MARCOS DAVID FERREIRA, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
Physicochemical changes in fresh-cut apple coated with chitosan nanoparticles during storage. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONGRESS OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 16.; LATIN AMERICAN SEMINAR OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 17., 2012, Foz do Iguaçu. Addressing global food security and wellness through food science and technology: abstracts. Foz do Iguaçu: [s.n.], 2012. 1 CD-ROM. IUFoST 2012. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
EVENTOS. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00795naa a2200193 a 4500
001 2044637
005 2016-05-06
008 2012 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aPILON, L.
245 $aPhysicochemical changes in fresh-cut apple coated with chitosan nanoparticles during storage.
260 $c2012
653 $aEVENTOS
700 1 $aSPRICIGO, P. C.
700 1 $aMOURA, M. R. de
700 1 $aMIRANDA, M.
700 1 $aCARMELO, L. G. P.
700 1 $aMATTOSO, L. H. C.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, M. D.
773 $tIn: WORLD CONGRESS OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 16.; LATIN AMERICAN SEMINAR OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 17., 2012, Foz do Iguaçu. Addressing global food security and wellness through food science and technology: abstracts. Foz do Iguaçu: [s.n.], 2012. 1 CD-ROM. IUFoST 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/03/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/04/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
BEHLING NETO, A.; REIS, R.; MORAES, K.; ROCHA, J.; CAMARGO, K.; CARVALHO, P.; MOMBACH, M.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e; ABREU, J.; CABRAL, L. |
|
Afiliação: |
ARTHUR BEHLING NETO, FAMEVZ; RAFAEL REIS, IFRO; KELLEN MORAES, UFMT-CUIABA; JULIAM ROCHA, UFMT-CUIABA; KARINE CAMARGO, UFMT-CUIABA; PERIVALDO CARVALHO, UFMT-CUIABA; MIRCÉIA MOMBACH, UFMT-CUIABA; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; JOADIL ABREU, UFMT-CUIABA; LUCIANO CABRAL, UFMT-CUIABA. |
|
Título: |
Organic acids and ethanol content in silages of different sorghum cultivars. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado. Produção animal para as novas gerações: anais. Gramado: SBZ, 2016. Não paginado. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sorghum stands out among others recommended plants for silage due to its optimal levels of water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and dry matter (DM), but additionally for presenting higher tolerance to drought and greater seeding range compared to corn. Among sorghum types there are: grain; forage and sweet sorghum, which differ in plant height and morphological characteristics. Sweet sorghum can be an interesting alternative for silage production due to its high yield, however it?s ensiling can promote ethanol production in the silo, since the high WSC content provides an ideal environment for the yeast activity that convert, in anaerobic environment, WSC in ethanol. There are new cultivars of sweet sorghum that can be used for silage production, but there is little information about their fermentation characteristics. Goal was to evaluate the organic acids and ethanol content in silages of different sorghum cultivars. Chemical analyses were performed at the Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, at Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá campus. Experimental design was a randomized block, in spli-plot design, with four replications. Plot treatments consisted of six sorghum cultivars of different purpose (BRS 308 and BRS 310, grain sorghum; BR 655 and BRS 610, silage sorghum; BRS 506 and CMSXS 647, sweet sorghum). Split-plot treatments consisted of crop period (first crop and second crop). Cultivar effect was observed for acetic acid content, while effect of interaction cultivar x crop period was observed for butyric acid and ethanol content. Forage sorghum cultivar BRS 610 and both sweet sorghum cultivars presented higher acetic acid content compared to grain sorghum cultivar BRS 308, probably due to higher DM content. Sweet sorghum cultivars presented higher ethanol and butyric acid content compared to other cultivar at first crop. No difference between cultivars was observed at second crop for both variables. For sweet sorghum cultivars at first crop, the high ethanol content (more than 5% DM basis) observed was probably because of the high WSC content (more than 38% DM basis), while the high butyric acid content (more than 0.2% DM basis) was possibly due to low DM content (less than 20%). This response patter was not observed at second crop, probably because of the lower WSC (lower than 34% DM basis) and higher DM content (more than 22%) observed for sweet sorghum cultivars. All evaluated sorghum cultivars can be used for silage production, but the use of sweet sorghum at first crop promotes silage with high levels of ethanol and butyric acid, being recommended for use at second crop. MenosSorghum stands out among others recommended plants for silage due to its optimal levels of water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and dry matter (DM), but additionally for presenting higher tolerance to drought and greater seeding range compared to corn. Among sorghum types there are: grain; forage and sweet sorghum, which differ in plant height and morphological characteristics. Sweet sorghum can be an interesting alternative for silage production due to its high yield, however it?s ensiling can promote ethanol production in the silo, since the high WSC content provides an ideal environment for the yeast activity that convert, in anaerobic environment, WSC in ethanol. There are new cultivars of sweet sorghum that can be used for silage production, but there is little information about their fermentation characteristics. Goal was to evaluate the organic acids and ethanol content in silages of different sorghum cultivars. Chemical analyses were performed at the Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, at Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá campus. Experimental design was a randomized block, in spli-plot design, with four replications. Plot treatments consisted of six sorghum cultivars of different purpose (BRS 308 and BRS 310, grain sorghum; BR 655 and BRS 610, silage sorghum; BRS 506 and CMSXS 647, sweet sorghum). Split-plot treatments consisted of crop period (first crop and second crop). Cultivar effect was observed for acetic acid content, while effect of interaction cultivar x cr... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Alcoholic fermentation; Ethanol. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03390nam a2200241 a 4500
001 2066358
005 2017-04-13
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBEHLING NETO, A.
245 $aOrganic acids and ethanol content in silages of different sorghum cultivars.
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado. Produção animal para as novas gerações: anais. Gramado: SBZ, 2016. Não paginado.$c2016
520 $aSorghum stands out among others recommended plants for silage due to its optimal levels of water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and dry matter (DM), but additionally for presenting higher tolerance to drought and greater seeding range compared to corn. Among sorghum types there are: grain; forage and sweet sorghum, which differ in plant height and morphological characteristics. Sweet sorghum can be an interesting alternative for silage production due to its high yield, however it?s ensiling can promote ethanol production in the silo, since the high WSC content provides an ideal environment for the yeast activity that convert, in anaerobic environment, WSC in ethanol. There are new cultivars of sweet sorghum that can be used for silage production, but there is little information about their fermentation characteristics. Goal was to evaluate the organic acids and ethanol content in silages of different sorghum cultivars. Chemical analyses were performed at the Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, at Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá campus. Experimental design was a randomized block, in spli-plot design, with four replications. Plot treatments consisted of six sorghum cultivars of different purpose (BRS 308 and BRS 310, grain sorghum; BR 655 and BRS 610, silage sorghum; BRS 506 and CMSXS 647, sweet sorghum). Split-plot treatments consisted of crop period (first crop and second crop). Cultivar effect was observed for acetic acid content, while effect of interaction cultivar x crop period was observed for butyric acid and ethanol content. Forage sorghum cultivar BRS 610 and both sweet sorghum cultivars presented higher acetic acid content compared to grain sorghum cultivar BRS 308, probably due to higher DM content. Sweet sorghum cultivars presented higher ethanol and butyric acid content compared to other cultivar at first crop. No difference between cultivars was observed at second crop for both variables. For sweet sorghum cultivars at first crop, the high ethanol content (more than 5% DM basis) observed was probably because of the high WSC content (more than 38% DM basis), while the high butyric acid content (more than 0.2% DM basis) was possibly due to low DM content (less than 20%). This response patter was not observed at second crop, probably because of the lower WSC (lower than 34% DM basis) and higher DM content (more than 22%) observed for sweet sorghum cultivars. All evaluated sorghum cultivars can be used for silage production, but the use of sweet sorghum at first crop promotes silage with high levels of ethanol and butyric acid, being recommended for use at second crop.
650 $aAlcoholic fermentation
650 $aEthanol
700 1 $aREIS, R.
700 1 $aMORAES, K.
700 1 $aROCHA, J.
700 1 $aCAMARGO, K.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, P.
700 1 $aMOMBACH, M.
700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
700 1 $aABREU, J.
700 1 $aCABRAL, L.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Nenhum exemplar cadastrado para este documento. |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
