| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/01/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/01/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SILVEIRA, P. M. da; NASCENTE, A. S.; STONE, L. F.; CARVALHO, M. da C. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
PEDRO MARQUES DA SILVEIRA, CNPAF; ADRIANO STEPHAN NASCENTE, CNPAF; LUIS FERNANDO STONE, CNPAF; MARIA DA CONCEICAO SANTANA CARVALHO, CNPAF. |
|
Título: |
Management of the fertilization in Brazilian Savannas with phosphorus and potassium in the succession of soybean, millet and common bean irrigated with center-pivot system. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 16, n. 11, p. 1212-1216, 2022. |
|
ISSN: |
1835-2707 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.22.16.11.p3717 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In Brazilian Savannas (Cerrado), soil is managed in a sustainable way with built fertility and the demand for new fertilization will essentially involve the replacement of exported compounds through harvested products. The objective of this study is to improve criteria for fertilization with phosphorus and potassium in the soybean (summer)/millet (off-season)/irrigated common bean (winter) agricultural system. The study was carried out for three growing seasons under randomized blocks design with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of T1= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + PK soybean (recommended fertilization); T2= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + soybean (without fertilization); T3= Common bean (without fertilization) + soybean PK (recommended fertilization); T4= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + P (amount exported by soybean) + soybean K (recommended fertilization); T5= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + P and K (amount exported by soybean) + soybean (without fertilization). The treatments T4 and T5 provided common bean and soybean yields (2945 and 4485 kg ha-1 and 2829 and 4412 kg ha-1, respectively) similar to the treatment T1 (2830 and 4353 kg ha-1 ), in which these crops received pre-fixed doses of recommended fertilization. It was necessary to make the fertilization only once in the year, and not in common bean and thereafter in soybean. We concluded that once there is no need to supply constant seeder with fertilizers for soybean, these treatments can be considered as fertilization management options in the soybean/millet/irrigated common bean agricultural system, which aims at greater operational profitability in planting activities. MenosIn Brazilian Savannas (Cerrado), soil is managed in a sustainable way with built fertility and the demand for new fertilization will essentially involve the replacement of exported compounds through harvested products. The objective of this study is to improve criteria for fertilization with phosphorus and potassium in the soybean (summer)/millet (off-season)/irrigated common bean (winter) agricultural system. The study was carried out for three growing seasons under randomized blocks design with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of T1= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + PK soybean (recommended fertilization); T2= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + soybean (without fertilization); T3= Common bean (without fertilization) + soybean PK (recommended fertilization); T4= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + P (amount exported by soybean) + soybean K (recommended fertilization); T5= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + P and K (amount exported by soybean) + soybean (without fertilization). The treatments T4 and T5 provided common bean and soybean yields (2945 and 4485 kg ha-1 and 2829 and 4412 kg ha-1, respectively) similar to the treatment T1 (2830 and 4353 kg ha-1 ), in which these crops received pre-fixed doses of recommended fertilization. It was necessary to make the fertilization only once in the year, and not in common bean and thereafter in soybean. We concluded that once there is no need to supply consta... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Cerrado; Feijão; Fósforo; Glycine Max; Irrigação por Pivô Central; Nitrogênio; Phaseolus Vulgaris; Potássio; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Beans; Irrigation; NPK fertilizers; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1150854/1/ajcs-2022.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02793naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2150854
005 2023-01-12
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1835-2707
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.22.16.11.p3717$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVEIRA, P. M. da
245 $aManagement of the fertilization in Brazilian Savannas with phosphorus and potassium in the succession of soybean, millet and common bean irrigated with center-pivot system.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aIn Brazilian Savannas (Cerrado), soil is managed in a sustainable way with built fertility and the demand for new fertilization will essentially involve the replacement of exported compounds through harvested products. The objective of this study is to improve criteria for fertilization with phosphorus and potassium in the soybean (summer)/millet (off-season)/irrigated common bean (winter) agricultural system. The study was carried out for three growing seasons under randomized blocks design with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of T1= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + PK soybean (recommended fertilization); T2= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + soybean (without fertilization); T3= Common bean (without fertilization) + soybean PK (recommended fertilization); T4= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + P (amount exported by soybean) + soybean K (recommended fertilization); T5= NPK common bean (recommended fertilization) + P and K (amount exported by soybean) + soybean (without fertilization). The treatments T4 and T5 provided common bean and soybean yields (2945 and 4485 kg ha-1 and 2829 and 4412 kg ha-1, respectively) similar to the treatment T1 (2830 and 4353 kg ha-1 ), in which these crops received pre-fixed doses of recommended fertilization. It was necessary to make the fertilization only once in the year, and not in common bean and thereafter in soybean. We concluded that once there is no need to supply constant seeder with fertilizers for soybean, these treatments can be considered as fertilization management options in the soybean/millet/irrigated common bean agricultural system, which aims at greater operational profitability in planting activities.
650 $aBeans
650 $aIrrigation
650 $aNPK fertilizers
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aCerrado
650 $aFeijão
650 $aFósforo
650 $aGlycine Max
650 $aIrrigação por Pivô Central
650 $aNitrogênio
650 $aPhaseolus Vulgaris
650 $aPotássio
650 $aSoja
700 1 $aNASCENTE, A. S.
700 1 $aSTONE, L. F.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, M. da C. S.
773 $tAustralian Journal of Crop Science$gv. 16, n. 11, p. 1212-1216, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
