| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 597 | |
| 84. |  | LIMA, A. T. da S.; CARDOSO, A. I. I. Análise dialélica de pepino do grupo varietal Japonês. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, v. 22, n. 2, jul. 2004. Suplemento 2. Trabalho apresentado no 44º Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura, 2004. Publicado também como resumo em: Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, v. 22, n. 2, p. 409, jul. 2004. Suplemento 1.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Hortaliças. |
|   |
| 91. | | CARDOSO, A. N.; RODRIGUES, T. O.; SANTOS, G. S. Inventário do Ciclo de Vida do óleo de Macaúba (Acrocomia aculeata). In: CONGRESSO DA REDE BRASILEIRA DE TECNOLOGIA DE BIODIESEL, 6.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PLANTAS OLEAGINOSAS, ÓLEOS, GORDURAS E BIODIESEL, 9., 2016, Natal, RN. Biodiesel: 10 anos de pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação no Brasil: anais. Lavras: UFLA, 2016. Não paginado.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia. |
|  |
| 92. | | CARDOSO, A. N.; SIQUEIRA, F. G. de; MENDONCA, S. LCA of a biologically detoxified cottonseed cake to be used for monogastric nutrition. In: GIANETTI, B. F.; ALMEIDA, C. M. V. B.; AGOSTINHO, F. (ed.). In: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCES IN CLEANER PRODUCTION, 9., 2020, Melbourne. Melbourne, 2020. Online Workshop.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia. |
| |
| 94. | | KANASHIRO, M.; FERREIRA, F. N.; CARDOSO, A. J. F. Manejo florestal comunitário e familiar, transdisciplinaridade e desenvolvimento local: Projeto Bom Manejo II, Resex Verde para Sempre, Porto de Moz-PA. In: CONFERÊNCIA IUFRO 2023 AMÉRICA LATINA, 2023, Curitiba. Anais... Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2023. p. 101. (Embrapa Florestas. Eventos técnicos & científicos, 2).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 95. | | CARDOSO, A. P.; NUNES, C. C.; ALVES, S. A. M. Eficiência de diferentes produtos no tratamento de ferimentos de colheita em macieiras Fuji para controle do cancro europeu das pomáceas. In: ENCONTRO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 15., 2017.; ENCONTRO DE PÓS-GRADUANDOS DA EMBRAPA UVA E VINHO, 11., 2017, Bento Gonçalves. Resumos...Bento Gonçalves, RS: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, 2017. p. 42.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 597 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
12/05/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/10/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
CARDOSO, A. da D.; ALVES, B. J. R.; URQUIAGA, S.; BODDEY, R. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
ABMAEL DA SILVA CARDOS, USP, JABOTICABAL; BRUNO JOSE RODRIGUES ALVES, CNPAB; SEGUNDO SACRAMENTO U CABALLERO, CNPAB; ROBERT MICHAEL BODDEY, CNPAB. |
|
Título: |
Effect of volume of urine and mass of faeces on N2O and CH4 emissions of dairy-cow excreta in a tropical pasture. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Production Science, v. 58, n. 6, 2016. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN15392 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
We aimed to quantify nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions as a function of the addition of different quantities of bovine faeces and urine on soil under pasture. Two experiments were performed in randomised complete blocks with five replicates. In the first experiment, the emissions of CH4 and N2O were evaluated for 14 days after the addition of four amounts of faeces (0.0, 1.2, 1.8 and 2.4 kg of fresh faeces per plot), and in a second experiment, N2O emissions were evaluated for 43 days after addition of four volumes of urine (0.0, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L). Urine and faeces came from crossbred (Fresian × Gir) dairy cows fed on pasture and concentrates. N2O emissions from faeces did not alter the emission factor (EF) according to the faeces weight (P = 0.73). N2O-N EF from faeces-N averaged 0.18% (±0.05) of total applied N. The volume of urine applied influenced N2O losses. The EF decreased linearly (P = 0.015) with increasing volumes of urine, being 4.9% (±0.75), 3.36% (±0.7) and 2.43% (±0.46) of N applied emitted as N2O for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L volumes of urine respectively. The EF from urine was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher than the EF from faeces. There was no change to the CH4 emissions per kilogram of excreta when the amount of faeces added was varied (P = 0.87). However, the CH4 emitted increased linearly with the amount of faeces (P = 0.02). The CH4 EF was estimated to be 0.95 (±0.38) kg/head.year. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bovine excrete; Pangola grass. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Greenhouse effect. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02077naa a2200205 a 4500
001 2044923
005 2023-10-11
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN15392$2DOI
100 1 $aCARDOSO, A. da D.
245 $aEffect of volume of urine and mass of faeces on N2O and CH4 emissions of dairy-cow excreta in a tropical pasture.
260 $c2016
520 $aWe aimed to quantify nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions as a function of the addition of different quantities of bovine faeces and urine on soil under pasture. Two experiments were performed in randomised complete blocks with five replicates. In the first experiment, the emissions of CH4 and N2O were evaluated for 14 days after the addition of four amounts of faeces (0.0, 1.2, 1.8 and 2.4 kg of fresh faeces per plot), and in a second experiment, N2O emissions were evaluated for 43 days after addition of four volumes of urine (0.0, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L). Urine and faeces came from crossbred (Fresian × Gir) dairy cows fed on pasture and concentrates. N2O emissions from faeces did not alter the emission factor (EF) according to the faeces weight (P = 0.73). N2O-N EF from faeces-N averaged 0.18% (±0.05) of total applied N. The volume of urine applied influenced N2O losses. The EF decreased linearly (P = 0.015) with increasing volumes of urine, being 4.9% (±0.75), 3.36% (±0.7) and 2.43% (±0.46) of N applied emitted as N2O for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L volumes of urine respectively. The EF from urine was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher than the EF from faeces. There was no change to the CH4 emissions per kilogram of excreta when the amount of faeces added was varied (P = 0.87). However, the CH4 emitted increased linearly with the amount of faeces (P = 0.02). The CH4 EF was estimated to be 0.95 (±0.38) kg/head.year.
650 $aGreenhouse effect
653 $aBovine excrete
653 $aPangola grass
700 1 $aALVES, B. J. R.
700 1 $aURQUIAGA, S.
700 1 $aBODDEY, R. M.
773 $tAnimal Production Science$gv. 58, n. 6, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
