| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 22 | |
| 4. |  | XAVIER, J. H. V.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ZOBY, J. L. F.; GASTAL, M. L. Análise de ciclo de vida (ACV) de sistemas de produção da agricultura familiar em Unaí, MG: resultados econômicos e impactos ambientais. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, Brasília, v.22, n. 3, p.547-586, set./dez. 2005.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|    |
| 7. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; ROSA, M. de F.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; MOTA, S. Avaliação do ciclo de vida de tecnologias agroindustriais. In: CASTELLANO, E. G.; ROSSI, A.; CRESTANA, S. (Ed.). Direito ambiental: princípios gerais do direito ambiental. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2014. v. 1 p. 341-355 Seção 1, Parte 3, Cap. 9,| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
|  |
| 11. | | SABLOWSKI, A. R. M.; GONÇALEZ, J. C.; ENCINAS, J. I.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; GOUVEIA, F. N.; CARNEIRO, R. Avaliação da cadeia produtiva madeiro-moveleiro no Distrito Federal utilizando a análise de fluxo de substância. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, v.2, n.1, p.38-43, jan./mar. 2007.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Algodão. |
| |
| 12. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ROSA, M. de F.; MOTA, F. S. B. Métodos de avaliação do desempenho ambiental de inovações tecnológicas agroindustriais. Espacios (digital), Caracas, v. 31, n. 4, p. 13, 2010. (Embrapa Agroindustria Tropical. Documentos, 126).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
| |
| 14. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; MOTA, F. S. B.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ROSA, M. de F.; ARAGAO, F. A. S. de. Environmental performance evaluation of immature coconut substrate using the Ambitec-Life Cycle model. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LCA IN THE AGRI-FOOD SECTOR, 6., 2008. Book of Abstracts. Zurich, Suíça: Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, 2008. p. 81.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
| |
| 15. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; MOTA, F. S. B.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ROSA, M. de F.; VIEIRA, V. de P. P. B. Conceptual framework for considering life cycle and watershed vulnerability analysis in the environmental performance evaluation of agro-industrial innovations (Ambitec-Life Cycle). In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LCA IN THE AGRI-FOOD SECTOR, 6., 2008. Book of Abstracts. Zurich, Suíça: Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, 2008. p. 36.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
| |
| 16. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; MOTA, F. S. B.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ROSA, M. de F.; VIEIRA, V. de P. P. B. Method for considering life cycle thinking and watershed vulnerability analysis in the environmental performance evaluation of agro-industrial innovations (Ambitec-Life Cycle). In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LCA IN THE AGRI-FOOD SECTOR, 6., 2008, Zurich. Proceedings... Zurich, Suíça: Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, 2008. p. 159-168.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
| |
| 18. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ROSA, M. de F.; ARAGAO, F. A. S. de; VIEIRA, V. de P. P. B.; MOTA, F. S. B. Environmental performance evaluation of agro-industrial innovations - part 1: Ambitec-Life Cycle, a methodological approach for considering life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production, Leiden, v. 18, n. 14, p. 1366-1375, 2010.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
| |
| 19. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ROSA, M. de F.; ARAGAO, F. A. S. de; VIEIRA, V. de P. P. B.; MOTA, F. S. B. Environmental performance evaluation of agro-industrial innovations - part 1: Ambitec-Life Cycle, a methodological approach for considering life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production, Leiden, v. 18, n. 14, p. 1366-1375, 2010.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 20. | | FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A.; ROSA, M. de F.; ARAGAO, F. A. S. de; VIEIRA, V. de P. P. B.; MOTA, F. S. B. Environmental performance evaluation of agro-industrial innovations - part 2: methodological approach for performing vulnerability analysis of watersheds. Journal of Cleaner Production, Leiden, v. 18, n. 14, p. 1376-1385, 2010.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 22 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Cerrados. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpac.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/07/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PORTO, B. H. C.; SOARES, J. P. G.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; JUNQUEIRA, A. M. R.; CALDEIRA-PIRES, A. de A.; MARTINEZ, D. G.; KUNZ, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOAO PAULO GUIMARAES SOARES, CPAC; GERALDO STACHETTI RODRIGUES, CNPMA; AIRTON KUNZ, CNPSA. |
|
Título: |
Socioenvironmental impacts of biogas production in a cooperative agroenergy condominium. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biomass and Bioenergy, v. 151, Aug. 2021. |
|
Páginas: |
13 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of biogas production implemented by family farmers organized in a cooperative agroenergy condominium. Evidences of changes in socioenvironmental performance were obtained through field observations and queries to the farmers. Observed ?change coefficients? were inserted into multicriteria indicators, weighted by their spatial scale of occurrence in the rural establishments, and impact indices were calculated for a set of seven characterization aspects (technological efficiency, environmental quality, productive process, employment, income, health, and management, and administration), integrated in 23 criteria and 123 indicators. The resulting impact indices of the implementation of the cooperative agroenergy condominium pointed out to positive performances in most of the criteria, with occasional transitory negative indices in specific indicators, related to farmers? particular contexts. Statistically significant positive results were obtained for seven of the ten Ecological impact criteria, as follows (i) use of agricultural inputs and resources; (ii) energy consumption; (iii) self-generation, utilization, reuse, and autonomy in the agricultural area; (iv) energy security; (v) emissions to the atmosphere; (vi) soil quality, and (vii) water quality. In the Socioenvironmental impacts dimension, statistically significant positive results were found for the following criteria: (i) productivity; (ii) productive integration in the concept of biorefinery/Ecopark; (iii) training; (iv) qualification and availability of work; (v) income generation; (vi) waste disposal, and (vii) institutional relationship. The agroenergy condominium contributed to reducing environmental impacts, promoting productive efficiency and improving income generation in the cooperating family farms. MenosThe objective of this study was to assess the impacts of biogas production implemented by family farmers organized in a cooperative agroenergy condominium. Evidences of changes in socioenvironmental performance were obtained through field observations and queries to the farmers. Observed ?change coefficients? were inserted into multicriteria indicators, weighted by their spatial scale of occurrence in the rural establishments, and impact indices were calculated for a set of seven characterization aspects (technological efficiency, environmental quality, productive process, employment, income, health, and management, and administration), integrated in 23 criteria and 123 indicators. The resulting impact indices of the implementation of the cooperative agroenergy condominium pointed out to positive performances in most of the criteria, with occasional transitory negative indices in specific indicators, related to farmers? particular contexts. Statistically significant positive results were obtained for seven of the ten Ecological impact criteria, as follows (i) use of agricultural inputs and resources; (ii) energy consumption; (iii) self-generation, utilization, reuse, and autonomy in the agricultural area; (iv) energy security; (v) emissions to the atmosphere; (vi) soil quality, and (vii) water quality. In the Socioenvironmental impacts dimension, statistically significant positive results were found for the following criteria: (i) productivity; (ii) productive integration in... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroenergia; Cooperação econômica; Energia renovável; Sustentabilidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Familiar; Biogás; Impacto Ambiental; Impacto Social. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Environmental sustainability; Family farms; Renewable energy sources. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02826naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2133105
005 2021-07-26
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPORTO, B. H. C.
245 $aSocioenvironmental impacts of biogas production in a cooperative agroenergy condominium.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a13 p.
520 $aThe objective of this study was to assess the impacts of biogas production implemented by family farmers organized in a cooperative agroenergy condominium. Evidences of changes in socioenvironmental performance were obtained through field observations and queries to the farmers. Observed ?change coefficients? were inserted into multicriteria indicators, weighted by their spatial scale of occurrence in the rural establishments, and impact indices were calculated for a set of seven characterization aspects (technological efficiency, environmental quality, productive process, employment, income, health, and management, and administration), integrated in 23 criteria and 123 indicators. The resulting impact indices of the implementation of the cooperative agroenergy condominium pointed out to positive performances in most of the criteria, with occasional transitory negative indices in specific indicators, related to farmers? particular contexts. Statistically significant positive results were obtained for seven of the ten Ecological impact criteria, as follows (i) use of agricultural inputs and resources; (ii) energy consumption; (iii) self-generation, utilization, reuse, and autonomy in the agricultural area; (iv) energy security; (v) emissions to the atmosphere; (vi) soil quality, and (vii) water quality. In the Socioenvironmental impacts dimension, statistically significant positive results were found for the following criteria: (i) productivity; (ii) productive integration in the concept of biorefinery/Ecopark; (iii) training; (iv) qualification and availability of work; (v) income generation; (vi) waste disposal, and (vii) institutional relationship. The agroenergy condominium contributed to reducing environmental impacts, promoting productive efficiency and improving income generation in the cooperating family farms.
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aFamily farms
650 $aRenewable energy sources
650 $aAgricultura Familiar
650 $aBiogás
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
650 $aImpacto Social
653 $aAgroenergia
653 $aCooperação econômica
653 $aEnergia renovável
653 $aSustentabilidade
700 1 $aSOARES, J. P. G.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, G. S.
700 1 $aJUNQUEIRA, A. M. R.
700 1 $aCALDEIRA-PIRES, A. de A.
700 1 $aMARTINEZ, D. G.
700 1 $aKUNZ, A.
773 $tBiomass and Bioenergy$gv. 151, Aug. 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
