| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/06/1996 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/06/1996 |
|
Autoria: |
BRANDT, S. A.; OLIVEIRA, F. T. G. de. |
|
Título: |
O planejamento da nova empresaa rural brasileira. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1973 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Rio de Janeiro: APEC, 1973. |
|
Páginas: |
260 p. |
|
Série: |
(APEC. Serie de Agricultura, 6). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil. |
|
Thesagro: |
Empresa Rural; Planejamento. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00453nam a2200169 a 4500
001 1238878
005 1996-06-08
008 1973 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBRANDT, S. A.
245 $aO planejamento da nova empresaa rural brasileira.
260 $aRio de Janeiro: APEC$c1973
300 $a260 p.
490 $a(APEC. Serie de Agricultura, 6).
650 $aEmpresa Rural
650 $aPlanejamento
653 $aBrasil
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, F. T. G. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/05/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
BONASSA, G.; BOLSAN, A. C.; HOLLAS, C. E.; VENTURIN, B.; CANDIDO, D.; CHINI, ANGÉLICA; PRÁ, M. C. de; ANTES, F. G.; CAMPOS, J. L.; KUNZ, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
GABRIELA BONASSA, Unioeste/Cascavel; ALICE CHIAPETTI BOLSAN, Unoesc/Joaçaba; CAMILA ESTER HOLLAS, UFFS/Erechim; BRUNO VENTURIN, Unioeste/Cascavel; DANIELA CANDIDO, UFFS/Erechim; ANGÉLICA CHINI, Unioeste/Cascavel; MARINA C. DE PRÁ, Unioeste/Cascavel; FABIANE GOLDSCHMIDT ANTES, CNPSA; JOSÉ LUIS CAMPOS, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez; AIRTON KUNZ, CNPSA. |
|
Título: |
Organic carbon bioavailability: is it a good driver to choose the best biological nitrogen removal process? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Science of the Total Environment, v. 786, n. 147390, 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147390 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Organic carbon can affect the biological nitrogen removal process since the Anammox, heterotrophic and denitrifying bacteria have different affinities and feedback in relation to carbon/nitrogen ratio. Therefore, we reviewed thewastewater carbon concentration, its biodegradability and bioavailability to choose the appropriate nitrogen removal process between conventional (nitrification-denitrification) and Anammox-based process (i.e. integrated with the partial nitritation, nitritation, simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification or partialdenitrification). This review will cover: (i) strategies to choose the best nitrogen removal route according to the wastewater characteristics in relation to the organic matter bioavailability and biodegradability; (ii) strategies to efficiently remove nitrogen and the remaining carbon fromeffluent in anammox-based process and its operating cost; (iii) an economic analysis to determine the operational costs of two-units Anammox-based process when compared with the commonly applied one-unit Anammox system (partial-nitritation-Anammox). On this review, a list of alternatives are summarized and explained for different nitrogen and biodegradable organic carbon |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Anammox-based process; Economic viability; Processo baseado em Anammox; Viabilidade econômica. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02131naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2131750
005 2021-07-12
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147390$2DOI
100 1 $aBONASSA, G.
245 $aOrganic carbon bioavailability$bis it a good driver to choose the best biological nitrogen removal process?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aAbstract: Organic carbon can affect the biological nitrogen removal process since the Anammox, heterotrophic and denitrifying bacteria have different affinities and feedback in relation to carbon/nitrogen ratio. Therefore, we reviewed thewastewater carbon concentration, its biodegradability and bioavailability to choose the appropriate nitrogen removal process between conventional (nitrification-denitrification) and Anammox-based process (i.e. integrated with the partial nitritation, nitritation, simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification or partialdenitrification). This review will cover: (i) strategies to choose the best nitrogen removal route according to the wastewater characteristics in relation to the organic matter bioavailability and biodegradability; (ii) strategies to efficiently remove nitrogen and the remaining carbon fromeffluent in anammox-based process and its operating cost; (iii) an economic analysis to determine the operational costs of two-units Anammox-based process when compared with the commonly applied one-unit Anammox system (partial-nitritation-Anammox). On this review, a list of alternatives are summarized and explained for different nitrogen and biodegradable organic carbon
653 $aAnammox-based process
653 $aEconomic viability
653 $aProcesso baseado em Anammox
653 $aViabilidade econômica
700 1 $aBOLSAN, A. C.
700 1 $aHOLLAS, C. E.
700 1 $aVENTURIN, B.
700 1 $aCANDIDO, D.
700 1 $aCHINI, ANGÉLICA
700 1 $aPRÁ, M. C. de
700 1 $aANTES, F. G.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, J. L.
700 1 $aKUNZ, A.
773 $tScience of the Total Environment$gv. 786, n. 147390, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
