| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/03/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/04/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SIMON, P. L.; DIECKOW, J.; ZANATTA, J. A.; RAMALHO, B.; RIBEIRO, R. H.; VAN DER WEERDEN, T.; KLEIN, C. A. M. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Priscila L. Simon, AgResearch Invermay; Jeferson Dieckow, UFPR; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; Bruna Ramalho, UFPR; Ricardo H. Ribeiro, UFPR; Tony van der Weerden, AgResearch Invermay; Cecile A. M. de Klein, AgResearch Invermay. |
|
Título: |
Does Brachiaria humidicola and dicyandiamide reduce nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from cattle urine patches in the subtropics? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Science of the Total Environment, v. 720, article 137692, June 2020. 10 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137692 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions frompasture-based livestock systems represent 34% of Brazil's agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. The forage species Brachiaria humidicola is known for its biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity and N2O emissions reduction ability from urine patches under tropical conditions. However, there is little information about the effect of BNI on N2O emission and ammonia (NH3) volatilisation in the subtropics. This study aimed to: (i) evaluate the potential of Brachiaria humidicola, compared with Panicum maximum (Jacq. cv. Áries; guinea grass), a broadly used grass (with no BNI capacity), to reduce N2O emissions under subtropical conditions; (ii) determine the efficacy of nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) to decrease N2O emissions; and (iii) determine the effect of brachiaria and DCD application on NH3 volatilisation. A field experiment was carried out using a Cambisol, where cattle urine ± DCD was applied to brachiaria and guinea grass. Over the 67-day measurement period, cumulative N2O emissions were 20% lower from urine patches in the brachiaria treatment (1138 mg N m?2, Emission factor = 1.06%) compared to guinea grass (1436 mg Nm?2, Emission factor=1.33%) (P b .10). A greenhouse experiment, using pots with the same treatments as in the field experiment, suggested that this could have been due to lower soil nitrate levels under brachiaria forage compared to guinea grass, indicating that BNI could be a possible mechanism for lower N2O emissions from brachiaria. The DCD application was effective in both forage species, decreasing N2O emissions by 40?50% (P b .10) compared with the urine only treatment. Approximately 25% of the urine applied N was lost via NH3 volatilisation, however the NH3 loss was not affected by forage species or DCD application (P N .10). Overall, the results demonstrated that brachiaria and DCD use are strategies that can reduce N2O emissions from urine patches. MenosNitrous oxide (N2O) emissions frompasture-based livestock systems represent 34% of Brazil's agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. The forage species Brachiaria humidicola is known for its biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity and N2O emissions reduction ability from urine patches under tropical conditions. However, there is little information about the effect of BNI on N2O emission and ammonia (NH3) volatilisation in the subtropics. This study aimed to: (i) evaluate the potential of Brachiaria humidicola, compared with Panicum maximum (Jacq. cv. Áries; guinea grass), a broadly used grass (with no BNI capacity), to reduce N2O emissions under subtropical conditions; (ii) determine the efficacy of nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) to decrease N2O emissions; and (iii) determine the effect of brachiaria and DCD application on NH3 volatilisation. A field experiment was carried out using a Cambisol, where cattle urine ± DCD was applied to brachiaria and guinea grass. Over the 67-day measurement period, cumulative N2O emissions were 20% lower from urine patches in the brachiaria treatment (1138 mg N m?2, Emission factor = 1.06%) compared to guinea grass (1436 mg Nm?2, Emission factor=1.33%) (P b .10). A greenhouse experiment, using pots with the same treatments as in the field experiment, suggested that this could have been due to lower soil nitrate levels under brachiaria forage compared to guinea grass, indicating that BNI could be a possible mechanism for ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Ammonium; BNI; Espécie forrageira; Forage species; NH3; Volatilisation; Volatilização. |
|
Thesagro: |
Amônia; Brachiaria Humidicola; Nitrato. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Nitrates. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02983naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2121071
005 2020-04-22
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137692$2DOI
100 1 $aSIMON, P. L.
245 $aDoes Brachiaria humidicola and dicyandiamide reduce nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from cattle urine patches in the subtropics?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aNitrous oxide (N2O) emissions frompasture-based livestock systems represent 34% of Brazil's agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. The forage species Brachiaria humidicola is known for its biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity and N2O emissions reduction ability from urine patches under tropical conditions. However, there is little information about the effect of BNI on N2O emission and ammonia (NH3) volatilisation in the subtropics. This study aimed to: (i) evaluate the potential of Brachiaria humidicola, compared with Panicum maximum (Jacq. cv. Áries; guinea grass), a broadly used grass (with no BNI capacity), to reduce N2O emissions under subtropical conditions; (ii) determine the efficacy of nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) to decrease N2O emissions; and (iii) determine the effect of brachiaria and DCD application on NH3 volatilisation. A field experiment was carried out using a Cambisol, where cattle urine ± DCD was applied to brachiaria and guinea grass. Over the 67-day measurement period, cumulative N2O emissions were 20% lower from urine patches in the brachiaria treatment (1138 mg N m?2, Emission factor = 1.06%) compared to guinea grass (1436 mg Nm?2, Emission factor=1.33%) (P b .10). A greenhouse experiment, using pots with the same treatments as in the field experiment, suggested that this could have been due to lower soil nitrate levels under brachiaria forage compared to guinea grass, indicating that BNI could be a possible mechanism for lower N2O emissions from brachiaria. The DCD application was effective in both forage species, decreasing N2O emissions by 40?50% (P b .10) compared with the urine only treatment. Approximately 25% of the urine applied N was lost via NH3 volatilisation, however the NH3 loss was not affected by forage species or DCD application (P N .10). Overall, the results demonstrated that brachiaria and DCD use are strategies that can reduce N2O emissions from urine patches.
650 $aNitrates
650 $aAmônia
650 $aBrachiaria Humidicola
650 $aNitrato
653 $aAmmonium
653 $aBNI
653 $aEspécie forrageira
653 $aForage species
653 $aNH3
653 $aVolatilisation
653 $aVolatilização
700 1 $aDIECKOW, J.
700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A.
700 1 $aRAMALHO, B.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO, R. H.
700 1 $aVAN DER WEERDEN, T.
700 1 $aKLEIN, C. A. M. de
773 $tScience of the Total Environment$gv. 720, article 137692, June 2020. 10 p.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/12/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/12/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
BASSI, N. S. S.; SILVA, C. DA S.; SCHNEIDER, A. H.; CARVALHO, H. G. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
NADIA SOLANGE SCHMIDT BASSI, CNPSA; CHRISTIAN LUIZ DA SILVA, UTFPR; ARIANE HINÇA SCHNEIDER, UTFPR; HELIO GOMES DE CARVALHO, UTFPR. |
|
Título: |
Controversies about the process of technology transfer from public research institutions in Brazil: the case of the Brazilian agricultural research corporation: Embrapa. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 9, issue 3, p. 182-195, 2014. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This article investigates the process of technology transfer in the Embrapa - Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, one of the most important center for tropical agricultural technology in the world. Our research is survey-based, and a questionnaire was applied to the employees working at strategic and operational level of a research unit of Embrapa. The results demonstrate that the technology transfer from Embrapa needs instruments, standards and standardized strategies. The lack of standardization of the can lead to disjointed actions among professionals and researchers, and may to make the Embrapa is seen in a fragmented form. Is important to explore new alternatives to treat simultaneously the issues of planning, research and development, transfer and communication in order to reset the current model, such as the use of Dual - use of technology transfer, characterized by a strong interaction between the chain production and potential users of the technology. |
|
Thesagro: |
Instituição de pesquisa; Modernização; Transferência de tecnologia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/114199/1/final7773.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01698naa a2200193 a 4500
001 2003379
005 2014-12-22
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBASSI, N. S. S.
245 $aControversies about the process of technology transfer from public research institutions in Brazil$bthe case of the Brazilian agricultural research corporation: Embrapa.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $aThis article investigates the process of technology transfer in the Embrapa - Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, one of the most important center for tropical agricultural technology in the world. Our research is survey-based, and a questionnaire was applied to the employees working at strategic and operational level of a research unit of Embrapa. The results demonstrate that the technology transfer from Embrapa needs instruments, standards and standardized strategies. The lack of standardization of the can lead to disjointed actions among professionals and researchers, and may to make the Embrapa is seen in a fragmented form. Is important to explore new alternatives to treat simultaneously the issues of planning, research and development, transfer and communication in order to reset the current model, such as the use of Dual - use of technology transfer, characterized by a strong interaction between the chain production and potential users of the technology.
650 $aInstituição de pesquisa
650 $aModernização
650 $aTransferência de tecnologia
700 1 $aSILVA, C. DA S.
700 1 $aSCHNEIDER, A. H.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, H. G. de
773 $tJournal of Technology Management & Innovation$gv. 9, issue 3, p. 182-195, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
