|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
Data corrente: |
28/09/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
23/01/2024 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
GÓMEZ, J. F. M.; CÔNSOLO, N. R. B.; ANTONELO, D. S.; BELINE, M.; GAGAOUA, M.; HIGUERA-PADILLA, A.; COLNAGO, L. A.; GERRARD, D. E.; SILVA, S. L. |
Afiliação: |
LUIZ ALBERTO COLNAGO, CNPDIA. |
Título: |
Impact of cattle feeding strategy on the beef metabolome. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Metabolites, v. 12, 640, 2022. |
Páginas: |
14 p. |
ISSN: |
2218-1989 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12070640 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The present study explored changes in the meat metabolome of animals subjected to Different finishing systems and growth rates. Thirty-six Angus × Nellore crossbred steers were used in a completely randomized design with four treatments: (1) feedlot system with high average daily gain (ADG; FH); (2) feedlot system with low ADG (FL); (3) pasture system with high ADG (PH); and (4) pasture system with low ADG (PL). After harvest and chilling, Longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle samples were taken for metabolite profile analysis using nuclear magnetic resonance. Spectrum was analyzed using chenomx software, and multi- and mega-variate data analyses were performed. The PLS-DA showed clear separation between FH and PL groups and overlap among treatments with different finishing systems but similar for matching ADG (FL and PH) treatments. Using a VIP cut-off of around 1.0, ATP and fumarate were shown to be greater in meat from PL cattle, while succinate, leucine, AMP, glutamate, carnosine, inosine, methionine, G1P, and choline were greater in meat from FH. Comparing FL and PH treatments, glutamine, carnosine, urea, NAD+, malonate,lactate, isoleucine, and alanine were greater in the meat of PH cattle, while G6P and betaine were elevated in that of FL cattle. Relevant pathways were also identified by differences in growth rate (FH versus PL) and finishing system were also noted. Growth rate caused a clear difference in meat metabolism that was highlighted by energy metabolism and associated pathways, while the feeding system tended to alter protein and lipid metabolism. MenosThe present study explored changes in the meat metabolome of animals subjected to Different finishing systems and growth rates. Thirty-six Angus × Nellore crossbred steers were used in a completely randomized design with four treatments: (1) feedlot system with high average daily gain (ADG; FH); (2) feedlot system with low ADG (FL); (3) pasture system with high ADG (PH); and (4) pasture system with low ADG (PL). After harvest and chilling, Longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle samples were taken for metabolite profile analysis using nuclear magnetic resonance. Spectrum was analyzed using chenomx software, and multi- and mega-variate data analyses were performed. The PLS-DA showed clear separation between FH and PL groups and overlap among treatments with different finishing systems but similar for matching ADG (FL and PH) treatments. Using a VIP cut-off of around 1.0, ATP and fumarate were shown to be greater in meat from PL cattle, while succinate, leucine, AMP, glutamate, carnosine, inosine, methionine, G1P, and choline were greater in meat from FH. Comparing FL and PH treatments, glutamine, carnosine, urea, NAD+, malonate,lactate, isoleucine, and alanine were greater in the meat of PH cattle, while G6P and betaine were elevated in that of FL cattle. Relevant pathways were also identified by differences in growth rate (FH versus PL) and finishing system were also noted. Growth rate caused a clear difference in meat metabolism that was highlighted by energy metabolism and associ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Feeding system; Growth rate. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1146903/1/P-Impact-of-Cattle-Feeding-Strategy-on-the-Beef-Metabolome.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02338naa a2200277 a 4500 001 2146903 005 2024-01-23 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2218-1989 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12070640$2DOI 100 1 $aGÓMEZ, J. F. M. 245 $aImpact of cattle feeding strategy on the beef metabolome.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 300 $a14 p. 520 $aThe present study explored changes in the meat metabolome of animals subjected to Different finishing systems and growth rates. Thirty-six Angus × Nellore crossbred steers were used in a completely randomized design with four treatments: (1) feedlot system with high average daily gain (ADG; FH); (2) feedlot system with low ADG (FL); (3) pasture system with high ADG (PH); and (4) pasture system with low ADG (PL). After harvest and chilling, Longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle samples were taken for metabolite profile analysis using nuclear magnetic resonance. Spectrum was analyzed using chenomx software, and multi- and mega-variate data analyses were performed. The PLS-DA showed clear separation between FH and PL groups and overlap among treatments with different finishing systems but similar for matching ADG (FL and PH) treatments. Using a VIP cut-off of around 1.0, ATP and fumarate were shown to be greater in meat from PL cattle, while succinate, leucine, AMP, glutamate, carnosine, inosine, methionine, G1P, and choline were greater in meat from FH. Comparing FL and PH treatments, glutamine, carnosine, urea, NAD+, malonate,lactate, isoleucine, and alanine were greater in the meat of PH cattle, while G6P and betaine were elevated in that of FL cattle. Relevant pathways were also identified by differences in growth rate (FH versus PL) and finishing system were also noted. Growth rate caused a clear difference in meat metabolism that was highlighted by energy metabolism and associated pathways, while the feeding system tended to alter protein and lipid metabolism. 653 $aFeeding system 653 $aGrowth rate 700 1 $aCÔNSOLO, N. R. B. 700 1 $aANTONELO, D. S. 700 1 $aBELINE, M. 700 1 $aGAGAOUA, M. 700 1 $aHIGUERA-PADILLA, A. 700 1 $aCOLNAGO, L. A. 700 1 $aGERRARD, D. E. 700 1 $aSILVA, S. L. 773 $tMetabolites$gv. 12, 640, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Unidades Centrais. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
21/07/1995 |
Data da última atualização: |
29/09/2014 |
Autoria: |
CRUZ, J. C.; MONTEIRO, J. de A.; SANTANA, D. P.; GARCIA, J. C.; BAHIA, F. G. F. T. de C.; SANS, L. M. A.; PEREIRA FILHO, A. F. C. |
Título: |
Recomendações técnicas para o cultivo do milho. |
Edição: |
2. ed. |
Ano de publicação: |
1996 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: EMBRAPA-SPI; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, 1996. |
Páginas: |
204 p. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
O zoneamento macroagroecológico; Práticas de manejo e conservação do solo; Manejo da fertilidade do solo; Fisiologia da produção; Cultivares de milho; Mecanização do plantio; Práticas culturais; Controle de plantas daninhas; Principais pragas e seu controle; Principais doenças; Mecanização da colheita; Secagem e armazenamento do milho; Controle de insetos no armazenamento em propriedades agrícolas; Milho irrigado. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Control; Controle; Cultivation; Cultivo; Disease; Maize; Pest; Postharvest; Recomendacao tecnica. |
Thesagro: |
Armazenamento; Doença; Irrigação; Milho; Pós-Colheita; Praga; Secagem. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Corn; drying; irrigation; storage. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- A Sistemas de Cultivo |
Marc: |
LEADER 01498nam a2200445 a 4500 001 1097128 005 2014-09-29 008 1996 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCRUZ, J. C. 245 $aRecomendações técnicas para o cultivo do milho. 250 $a2. ed. 260 $aBrasília, DF: EMBRAPA-SPI; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo$c1996 300 $a204 p. 520 $aO zoneamento macroagroecológico; Práticas de manejo e conservação do solo; Manejo da fertilidade do solo; Fisiologia da produção; Cultivares de milho; Mecanização do plantio; Práticas culturais; Controle de plantas daninhas; Principais pragas e seu controle; Principais doenças; Mecanização da colheita; Secagem e armazenamento do milho; Controle de insetos no armazenamento em propriedades agrícolas; Milho irrigado. 650 $aCorn 650 $adrying 650 $airrigation 650 $astorage 650 $aArmazenamento 650 $aDoença 650 $aIrrigação 650 $aMilho 650 $aPós-Colheita 650 $aPraga 650 $aSecagem 653 $aControl 653 $aControle 653 $aCultivation 653 $aCultivo 653 $aDisease 653 $aMaize 653 $aPest 653 $aPostharvest 653 $aRecomendacao tecnica 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, J. de A. 700 1 $aSANTANA, D. P. 700 1 $aGARCIA, J. C. 700 1 $aBAHIA, F. G. F. T. de C. 700 1 $aSANS, L. M. A. 700 1 $aPEREIRA FILHO, A. F. C.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|