|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
Data corrente: |
14/06/1995 |
Data da última atualização: |
14/06/1995 |
Autoria: |
COOK, C. W.; HARRIS, L. E.; YOUNG, M. C. |
Título: |
Botanical and nutritive content of diets of cattle and sheep under single and common use on mountain range. |
Ano de publicação: |
1967 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Animal Science, v.26, p.1169-1174, 1967. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
A study to determine differences in the botanical composition, nutritive content and digestibility of diets of cattle and sheep grazing singly and in common on sagebrush-grass and aspen ranges was conducted on northern Utah mountain ranges the summers of 1963 and 1964. Six study areas of each vegetation type were selected and fenced into three enclosures, allowing proportionate amounts of herbage per animal-unit-day grazing to obtain comparable use of preferred forage classes by cattle and sheep. Two of the enclosures were grazed singly by cattle and sheep, and third enclosure of combined size of the other two was grazed by the animals in common. Experimental animals were equipped with esophageal-fistula cannulae. A 5- to 6-day digestion trial was conducted during each grazing period. Digestibility was determined by the lignin-ratio technique. Cattle preferred grasses, while sheep preferred forbs and browse. Utilization of grasses by both cattle and sheep decreased and preference for browse increased as the season advanced. Utilization of the primary herbage species under common use was found to be, in most instances, intermediate to the single-use values for cattle and sheep. Threfore, it was concluded that if utilization of the primary forage species were allowed to reach the equivalent under single use, additional animal-days of grazing per acre would be realized under common use as compared to single use by either kind of animal. Cattle diets were higher in cellulose, but sheep diets contained more total protein, lignin, other carbohydrated and phosphorus. Sagebrush-grass range yielded diets higher in total protein, lignin and gross energy, but lower in ether extract and the other carbohydrates compared to aspen range. Cattle digested, cellulose, ether extract and gross energy better than sheep and had more DE and TDN in their diets. Digestion coefficients fopr ether extracts, other carbohydrates and gross energy were higher for diets on aspen range. These diets also contained more DE and TDN than diets on sagebrush-grass range. Grazing systems did not significantly influence the digestibility of any nutrient studied, nor did they influence the level of any digestible nutrient. MenosA study to determine differences in the botanical composition, nutritive content and digestibility of diets of cattle and sheep grazing singly and in common on sagebrush-grass and aspen ranges was conducted on northern Utah mountain ranges the summers of 1963 and 1964. Six study areas of each vegetation type were selected and fenced into three enclosures, allowing proportionate amounts of herbage per animal-unit-day grazing to obtain comparable use of preferred forage classes by cattle and sheep. Two of the enclosures were grazed singly by cattle and sheep, and third enclosure of combined size of the other two was grazed by the animals in common. Experimental animals were equipped with esophageal-fistula cannulae. A 5- to 6-day digestion trial was conducted during each grazing period. Digestibility was determined by the lignin-ratio technique. Cattle preferred grasses, while sheep preferred forbs and browse. Utilization of grasses by both cattle and sheep decreased and preference for browse increased as the season advanced. Utilization of the primary herbage species under common use was found to be, in most instances, intermediate to the single-use values for cattle and sheep. Threfore, it was concluded that if utilization of the primary forage species were allowed to reach the equivalent under single use, additional animal-days of grazing per acre would be realized under common use as compared to single use by either kind of animal. Cattle diets were higher in cellulose, bu... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Bovine; Mountain range. |
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Carneiro; Dieta; Nutrição. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
diet; nutrition; sheep. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02879naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1784561 005 1995-06-14 008 1967 bl --- 0-- u #d 100 1 $aCOOK, C. W. 245 $aBotanical and nutritive content of diets of cattle and sheep under single and common use on mountain range. 260 $c1967 520 $aA study to determine differences in the botanical composition, nutritive content and digestibility of diets of cattle and sheep grazing singly and in common on sagebrush-grass and aspen ranges was conducted on northern Utah mountain ranges the summers of 1963 and 1964. Six study areas of each vegetation type were selected and fenced into three enclosures, allowing proportionate amounts of herbage per animal-unit-day grazing to obtain comparable use of preferred forage classes by cattle and sheep. Two of the enclosures were grazed singly by cattle and sheep, and third enclosure of combined size of the other two was grazed by the animals in common. Experimental animals were equipped with esophageal-fistula cannulae. A 5- to 6-day digestion trial was conducted during each grazing period. Digestibility was determined by the lignin-ratio technique. Cattle preferred grasses, while sheep preferred forbs and browse. Utilization of grasses by both cattle and sheep decreased and preference for browse increased as the season advanced. Utilization of the primary herbage species under common use was found to be, in most instances, intermediate to the single-use values for cattle and sheep. Threfore, it was concluded that if utilization of the primary forage species were allowed to reach the equivalent under single use, additional animal-days of grazing per acre would be realized under common use as compared to single use by either kind of animal. Cattle diets were higher in cellulose, but sheep diets contained more total protein, lignin, other carbohydrated and phosphorus. Sagebrush-grass range yielded diets higher in total protein, lignin and gross energy, but lower in ether extract and the other carbohydrates compared to aspen range. Cattle digested, cellulose, ether extract and gross energy better than sheep and had more DE and TDN in their diets. Digestion coefficients fopr ether extracts, other carbohydrates and gross energy were higher for diets on aspen range. These diets also contained more DE and TDN than diets on sagebrush-grass range. Grazing systems did not significantly influence the digestibility of any nutrient studied, nor did they influence the level of any digestible nutrient. 650 $adiet 650 $anutrition 650 $asheep 650 $aBovino 650 $aCarneiro 650 $aDieta 650 $aNutrição 653 $aBovine 653 $aMountain range 700 1 $aHARRIS, L. E. 700 1 $aYOUNG, M. C. 773 $tJournal of Animal Science$gv.26, p.1169-1174, 1967.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
08/10/2014 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/01/2015 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
ASSIS, D. P.; OLIVEIRA, I. S.; NASCIMENTO, A. S. do; AZEVEDO FILHO, W. S. de. |
Afiliação: |
DANIEL PASSOS ASSIS, UFRB; INGRID SANTIAGO OLIVEIRA, UFRB; ANTONIO SOUZA DO NASCIMENTO, CNPMF; WILSON SAMPAIO DE AZEVEDO FILHO, UCS. |
Título: |
Atratividade de cigarrinhas de xilema (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae e Cercopidae) pelo Boldo, Vernonia Condensata Becker em pomar de laranja pera: resultados preliminares. |
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FRUTICULTURA, 23., 2014, Cuiabá. Fruticultura: oportunidades e desafios para o Brasil. [S.l.]: SBF, 2014. 1 CD-ROM. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
A Clorose Variegada do Citros (CVC), também conhecida como amarelinho, é causada pela bactéria Xylella fastidiosa e foi relatada pela primeira vez em São Paulo (1987), chegando à Bahia em 1997 (SANTOS FILHO et al, 2010; NEGRI, 1990). É uma das doenças mais importantes para citricultura brasileira devido aos prejuízos causados, em especial, aos pomares de laranjas-doce, além de outras utilizadas como porta-enxerto (DONADIO, 2001). |
Palavras-Chave: |
Clorose Variegada do Citros. |
Thesagro: |
Cigarrinha; Fruta cítrica; Praga de planta; Xilema. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Citrus variegated chlorosis. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 01270nam a2200217 a 4500 001 1996907 005 2015-01-09 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aASSIS, D. P. 245 $aAtratividade de cigarrinhas de xilema (Hemiptera$bCicadellidae e Cercopidae) pelo Boldo, Vernonia Condensata Becker em pomar de laranja pera: resultados preliminares. 260 $aIn: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FRUTICULTURA, 23., 2014, Cuiabá. Fruticultura: oportunidades e desafios para o Brasil. [S.l.]: SBF, 2014. 1 CD-ROM.$c2014 520 $aA Clorose Variegada do Citros (CVC), também conhecida como amarelinho, é causada pela bactéria Xylella fastidiosa e foi relatada pela primeira vez em São Paulo (1987), chegando à Bahia em 1997 (SANTOS FILHO et al, 2010; NEGRI, 1990). É uma das doenças mais importantes para citricultura brasileira devido aos prejuízos causados, em especial, aos pomares de laranjas-doce, além de outras utilizadas como porta-enxerto (DONADIO, 2001). 650 $aCitrus variegated chlorosis 650 $aCigarrinha 650 $aFruta cítrica 650 $aPraga de planta 650 $aXilema 653 $aClorose Variegada do Citros 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, I. S. 700 1 $aNASCIMENTO, A. S. do 700 1 $aAZEVEDO FILHO, W. S. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|