| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 13 | |
| 5. |  | TOFANGSAZI, N.; BUSS, E. A.; MEAGHER, R.; MASCARIN, G. M.; ARTHURS, S. P. Thermal requirements and development of Herpetogramma phaeopteralis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae). Journal of Economic Entomology, Lanham, v. 105, n. 5, p. 1573-1580, Oct. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|    |
| 8. | | MASCARIN, G. M.; PEREIRA-JUNIOR, R. A.; FERNANDES, E. K. K.; QUINTELA, E. D.; DUNLAP, C. A.; ARTHURS, S. P. Phenotype responses to abiotic stresses, asexual reproduction and virulence among isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus Cordyceps javanica (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae). Microbiological Research, v. 216, p. 12-22, Nov. 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 9. | | ARISTIZÁBAL, L. F.; SHRINER, S.; HOLLINGSWORTH, R.; MASCARIN, G. M.; CHAVES, B.; MATSUMOTO, T.; ARTHURS, S. P. Field sampling strategies for coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) infesting berries in coffee farms in Hawaii. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, v. 38, n. 4, p. 418?426, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 11. | | MORALES-REYES, C.; MASCARIN, G. M.; JACKSON, M. A.; HALL, D.; SANCHEZ-PENA, S. R.; ARTHURS, S. P. Comparison of aerial conidia and blastospores from two entomopathogenic fungi against Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Biocontrol Science and Technology, v. 28, n. 8, p. 737-749, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 12. | | MASCARIN, G. M.; GUARÍN-MOLINA, J. H.; ARTHURS, S. P.; HUMBER, R. A.; MORAL, R. de A.; DEMÉTRIO, C. G. B.; DELALIBERA JUNIOR, I. Seasonal prevalence of the insect pathogenic fungus Colletotrichum nymphaeae in Brazilian citrus groves under different chemical pesticide regimes. Fungal Ecology, v. 22, p. 43-51, Aug. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| 13. | | QUINTELA, E. D.; SOUZA, T. L. P. O. de; FARIA, J. C. de; ARAGÃO, F. J. L.; SILVA, J. F. A. e; DEL PELOSO, M. J.; ARTHURS, S. P. Comparison of Bemisia tabaci infestation, virus infection, and yield in conventional and transgenic Bean golden mosaic virus-resistant common bean elite lines. Florida Entomologist, v. 106, n. 1, p. 29-37, Mar. 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 13 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/10/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/08/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
HOLLINGSWORTH, R. G.; ARISTIZÁBAL, L. F.; SHRINER, S.; MASCARIN, G. M.; MORAL, R. de A.; ARTHURS, S. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
ROBERT G HOLLINGSWORTH, USDA-ARS; LUIS F ARISTIZÁBAL, Coffee Growers and Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council; SUZANNE SHRINER, Coffee Growers and Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council; GABRIEL MOURA MASCARIN, CNPMA; RAFAEL DE ALMEIDA MORAL, Maynooth University; STEVEN P ARTHURS, BioBee USA. |
|
Título: |
Incorporating Beauveria bassiana into an integrated pest management plan for coffee berry borer in Hawaii. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 4, article 22, March 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 1-10. |
|
ISSN: |
2571-581X |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00022 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Since its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka?u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4?5 vs. 7?11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged location of founder females in the outer berry endosperm favors its infection. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs; however, additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands. MenosSince its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka?u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4?5 vs. 7?11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged l... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Coffee farms; Mycoinsecticide. |
|
Thesagro: |
Beauveria Bassiana; Café; Controle Biológico; Fungo Para Controle Biológico; Hypothenemus Hampei; Praga de Planta. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biological control; Biological control agents; Coffea arabica var. arabica; Entomopathogenic fungi; Insect pests. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/216488/1/Mascarin-Incorporating-Beauveria-2020.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02968naa a2200373 a 4500
001 2125356
005 2021-08-25
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2571-581X
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00022$2DOI
100 1 $aHOLLINGSWORTH, R. G.
245 $aIncorporating Beauveria bassiana into an integrated pest management plan for coffee berry borer in Hawaii.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 1-10.
520 $aSince its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka?u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4?5 vs. 7?11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged location of founder females in the outer berry endosperm favors its infection. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs; however, additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands.
650 $aBiological control
650 $aBiological control agents
650 $aCoffea arabica var. arabica
650 $aEntomopathogenic fungi
650 $aInsect pests
650 $aBeauveria Bassiana
650 $aCafé
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aFungo Para Controle Biológico
650 $aHypothenemus Hampei
650 $aPraga de Planta
653 $aCoffee farms
653 $aMycoinsecticide
700 1 $aARISTIZÁBAL, L. F.
700 1 $aSHRINER, S.
700 1 $aMASCARIN, G. M.
700 1 $aMORAL, R. de A.
700 1 $aARTHURS, S. P.
773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems$gv. 4, article 22, March 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
