Data/hora: 25/06/2024 11:32:13

Biblioteca(s): 	Embrapa Acre.	
Data corrente: 	10/06/2020	
Data da última atualização: 	28/06/2021	
Autoria: 	MATUK, F. A.; TURNHOUT, E.; FLESKENS, L.; AMARAL, E. F. do; HAVERROTH, M.; BEHAGEL, J. H.	
Afiliação: 	Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk, Wageningen University; Esther Turnhout, Wageningen University; Luuk Fleskens, Wageningen University; EUFRAN FERREIRA DO AMARAL, CPAF-AC; MOACIR HAVERROTH, CPAF-AC; Jelle Hendrik Behagel, Wageningen University.	
Título: 	Allying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability: The Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá Indigenous people case.	
Ano de publicação: 	2020	
Fonte/Imprenta: 	Environmental Science and Policy, v. 112, p. 1-9, 2020.	
ISSN: 	1462-9011	
DOI: 	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.018	
Idioma: 	Inglês	
Conteúdo: 	Environmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD+policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, thereby ensuring both the legitimacy and the usability of the outcomes of knowledge integration and co-production.	
Palavras-Chave: 	Acre; Amazonia Occidental; Amazônia Ocidental; Conhecimento tradicional; Feijó (AC); Gestão participativa; Método participativo; Participative management; Povos indígenas; Pueblos indigenas; REDD+; Servicios ecosistémicos; Serviços ecossistêmicos; SISA; Terra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO); Western Amazon.	
Thesagro: 	Planejamento Participativo.	
Thesaurus Nal: 	Ecosystem services; Environmental policy; Indigenous knowledge; Indigenous peoples.	
Categoria do assunto: 	--	
URL: 	http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/213936/1/27006.pdf	
Registro original: 	Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC)	
Exemplares: 	CPAF-AC - (27006-1) - UPC - AP - DD -  -  -  - DIS