| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 45.523 | |
| 64. |  | PACHECO, C. A. O.; CARVALHO, H. W. L. de; GUIMARÃES, L. J. M.; GUIMARÃES, P. E. de O.; MEIRELLES, W. F.; SILVA, A. R. da; PARENTONI, S. N. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de produção e estratificação de ambientes com base na classificação de variedades de milho em trinta e um locais. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE MILHO E SORGO, 27.; SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO SOBRE A LAGARTA-DO-CARTUCHO, SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA, 3.; WORKSHOP SOBRE MANEJO E ETIOLOGIA DA MANCHA BRANCA DO MILHO, 2008, Londrina. Agroenergia, produção de alimentos e mudanças climáticas: desafios para milho e sorgo: trabalhos e palestras. [Londrina]: IAPAR; [Sete Lagoas]: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, 2008. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
|   |
| 80. | | PORTO, R. M.; CHAGA, D. T. da; BORGES, J. D.; LEANDRO, W. M.; FERREIRA, E. P. de B.; DIDONET, A. D. Avaliações preliminares de sistemas agroflorestais voltados para produção de grãos e bioenergia. In: SEMINÁRIO JOVENS TALENTOS, 5., 2011, Santo Antônio de Goiás. Resumos apresentados. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 2011. p. 21. (Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Documentos, 270).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 45.523 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/09/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, R. F. B. da; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; VIÑA, A.; DOU, Y.; MORAN, E.; BATISTELLA, M.; LAPOLA, D. M.; LIU, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAMON FELIPE BICUDO DA SILVA, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; JAMES D. A. MILLINGTON, KING’S COLLEGE LONDON; ANDRÉS VIÑA, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA; YUE DOU, UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE; EMILIO MORAN, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; MATEUS BATISTELLA, CNPTIA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; DAVID M. LAPOLA, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; JIANGUO LIU, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. |
|
Título: |
Balancing food production with climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Science of The Total Environment, v. 904, 166681, Dec. 2023. |
|
ISSN: |
0048-9697 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166681 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract. Climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation are two major environmental actions that need to be effectively performed this century, alongside ensuring food supply for a growing global human population. These three issues are highly interlinked through land management systems. Thus, major global food production regions located in biodiversity hotpots and with potential for carbon sequestration face trade-offs between these valuable land-based ecosystem services. The state of Mato Grosso in Brazil is one such region, where private lands that have been illegally used for agriculture could be restored to natural vegetation - with potential benefits for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation, although with potentially negative effects on food production. To address this challenge, in this study we used a multicriteria nexus modeling approach that considers carbon stocks, priority areas for biodiversity conservation, and the opportunity for food production, to develop scenarios of land allocation that aim to balance the benefits and drawbacks of ecosystem restoration. Results show that forcing landowners to restore their individual lands compromises the potential for a "green land market" throughout the Amazon biome in which private landowners with lower food production capacities (e.g., less connected to markets and infrastructure) would benefit from restoration programs that compensate them for the inclusion of environmental restoration among their economic activities, instead of taking large economic risks to produce more food. We additionally highlight that strategic ecosystem restoration can achieve higher gains in biodiversity and carbon with lower costs of restoration actions and with minimal impacts on agriculture. Analyses like ours demonstrate how scenarios of land allocation that simultaneously address climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation through ecosystem restoration, while also minimizing possible impacts on food production, can be sought to move the world towards a sustainable future. MenosAbstract. Climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation are two major environmental actions that need to be effectively performed this century, alongside ensuring food supply for a growing global human population. These three issues are highly interlinked through land management systems. Thus, major global food production regions located in biodiversity hotpots and with potential for carbon sequestration face trade-offs between these valuable land-based ecosystem services. The state of Mato Grosso in Brazil is one such region, where private lands that have been illegally used for agriculture could be restored to natural vegetation - with potential benefits for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation, although with potentially negative effects on food production. To address this challenge, in this study we used a multicriteria nexus modeling approach that considers carbon stocks, priority areas for biodiversity conservation, and the opportunity for food production, to develop scenarios of land allocation that aim to balance the benefits and drawbacks of ecosystem restoration. Results show that forcing landowners to restore their individual lands compromises the potential for a "green land market" throughout the Amazon biome in which private landowners with lower food production capacities (e.g., less connected to markets and infrastructure) would benefit from restoration programs that compensate them for the inclusion of environmental restoration amo... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bioma Amazônia; Conservação da biodiversidade; Mitigação de mudanças climáticas; Sequestro de carbono. |
|
Thesagro: |
Produção de Alimentos. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biodiversity; Carbon sequestration; Climate change; Food production. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03133naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2156523
005 2023-09-08
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0048-9697
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166681$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVA, R. F. B. da
245 $aBalancing food production with climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aAbstract. Climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation are two major environmental actions that need to be effectively performed this century, alongside ensuring food supply for a growing global human population. These three issues are highly interlinked through land management systems. Thus, major global food production regions located in biodiversity hotpots and with potential for carbon sequestration face trade-offs between these valuable land-based ecosystem services. The state of Mato Grosso in Brazil is one such region, where private lands that have been illegally used for agriculture could be restored to natural vegetation - with potential benefits for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation, although with potentially negative effects on food production. To address this challenge, in this study we used a multicriteria nexus modeling approach that considers carbon stocks, priority areas for biodiversity conservation, and the opportunity for food production, to develop scenarios of land allocation that aim to balance the benefits and drawbacks of ecosystem restoration. Results show that forcing landowners to restore their individual lands compromises the potential for a "green land market" throughout the Amazon biome in which private landowners with lower food production capacities (e.g., less connected to markets and infrastructure) would benefit from restoration programs that compensate them for the inclusion of environmental restoration among their economic activities, instead of taking large economic risks to produce more food. We additionally highlight that strategic ecosystem restoration can achieve higher gains in biodiversity and carbon with lower costs of restoration actions and with minimal impacts on agriculture. Analyses like ours demonstrate how scenarios of land allocation that simultaneously address climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation through ecosystem restoration, while also minimizing possible impacts on food production, can be sought to move the world towards a sustainable future.
650 $aBiodiversity
650 $aCarbon sequestration
650 $aClimate change
650 $aFood production
650 $aProdução de Alimentos
653 $aBioma Amazônia
653 $aConservação da biodiversidade
653 $aMitigação de mudanças climáticas
653 $aSequestro de carbono
700 1 $aMILLINGTON, J. D. A.
700 1 $aVIÑA, A.
700 1 $aDOU, Y.
700 1 $aMORAN, E.
700 1 $aBATISTELLA, M.
700 1 $aLAPOLA, D. M.
700 1 $aLIU, J.
773 $tScience of The Total Environment$gv. 904, 166681, Dec. 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
