|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
12/08/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/02/2025 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BARLOW, J.; LENNOX, G. D.; FERREIRA, J.; BERENGUER, E.; LEES, A. C.; NALLY, R. M.; THOMSON, J. R.; FERRAZ, S. F. de B.; LOUZADA, J.; OLIVEIRA, V. H. F.; PARRY, L.; SOLAR, R. R. de C.; VIEIRA, I. C. G.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; BEGOTTI, R. A.; BRAGA, R. F.; CARDOSO, T. M.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de; SOUZA JUNIOR, C. M.; MOURA, N. G.; NUNES, S. S.; SIQUEIRA, J. V.; PARDINI, R.; SILVEIRA, J. M.; VAZ-DE-MELLO, F. Z.; VEIGA, R. C. S.; VENTURIERI, A.; GARDNER, T. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOS BARLOW, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; GARETH D. LENNOX, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; ERIKA BERENGUER, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; ALEXANDER C. LEES, MUSEU PARAENSE EMILIO GOELDI; RALPH MAC NALLY, UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA; JAMES R. THOMSON, UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA; SILVIO FROSINI DE BARROS FERRAZ, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; JULIO LOUZADA, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; VICTOR HUGO FONSECA OLIVEIRA, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; LUKE PARRY, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; RICARDO RIBEIRO DE CASTRO SOLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; IMA C. G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMILIO GOELDI; LUIZ E. O. C. ARAGÃO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; RODRIGO ANZOLIN BEGOTTI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RODRIGO F. BRAGA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; THIAGO MOREIRA CARDOSO; RAIMUNDO COSME DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPATU; CARLOS M. SOUZA JUNIOR, INSTITUTO DO HOMEM E MEIO AMBIENTE DA AMAZÔNIA; NÁRGILA G. MOURA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMILIO GOELDI; SÂMIA SERRA NUNES, INSTITUTO DO HOMEM E MEIO AMBIENTE DA AMAZÔNIA; JOÃO VICTOR SIQUEIRA, INSTITUTO DO HOMEM E MEIO AMBIENTE DA AMAZÔNIA; RENATA PARDINI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; JULIANA M. SILVEIRA, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; FERNANDO Z. VAZ-DE-MELLO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MATO GROSSO; RUAN CARLO STULPEN VEIGA, INSTITUTO SOCIO AMBIENTAL SERRA DO MAR; ADRIANO VENTURIERI, CPATU; TOBY A. GARDNER, STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE. |
|
Título: |
Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature, v. 535, n. 7610, p. 144-147, July 2016. |
|
DOI: |
10.1038/nature18326 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Concerted political attention has focused on reducing deforestation1, 2, 3, and this remains the cornerstone of most biodiversity conservation strategies4, 5, 6. However, maintaining forest cover may not reduce anthropogenic forest disturbances, which are rarely considered in conservation programmes6. These disturbances occur both within forests, including selective logging and wildfires7, 8, and at the landscape level, through edge, area and isolation effects9. Until now, the combined effect of anthropogenic disturbance on the conservation value of remnant primary forests has remained unknown, making it impossible to assess the relative importance of forest disturbance and forest loss. Here we address these knowledge gaps using a large data set of plants, birds and dung beetles (1,538, 460 and 156 species, respectively) sampled in 36 catchments in the Brazilian state of Pará. Catchments retaining more than 69?80% forest cover lost more conservation value from disturbance than from forest loss. For example, a 20% loss of primary forest, the maximum level of deforestation allowed on Amazonian properties under Brazil?s Forest Code5, resulted in a 39?54% loss of conservation value: 96?171% more than expected without considering disturbance effects. We extrapolated the disturbance-mediated loss of conservation value throughout Pará, which covers 25% of the Brazilian Amazon. Although disturbed forests retained considerable conservation value compared with deforested areas, the toll of disturbance outside Pará?s strictly protected areas is equivalent to the loss of 92,000?139,000 km2 of primary forest. Even this lowest estimate is greater than the area deforested across the entire Brazilian Amazon between 2006 and 2015 (ref. 10). Species distribution models showed that both landscape and within-forest disturbances contributed to biodiversity loss, with the greatest negative effects on species of high conservation and functional value. These results demonstrate an urgent need for policy interventions that go beyond the maintenance of forest cover to safeguard the hyper-diversity of tropical forest ecosystems. MenosConcerted political attention has focused on reducing deforestation1, 2, 3, and this remains the cornerstone of most biodiversity conservation strategies4, 5, 6. However, maintaining forest cover may not reduce anthropogenic forest disturbances, which are rarely considered in conservation programmes6. These disturbances occur both within forests, including selective logging and wildfires7, 8, and at the landscape level, through edge, area and isolation effects9. Until now, the combined effect of anthropogenic disturbance on the conservation value of remnant primary forests has remained unknown, making it impossible to assess the relative importance of forest disturbance and forest loss. Here we address these knowledge gaps using a large data set of plants, birds and dung beetles (1,538, 460 and 156 species, respectively) sampled in 36 catchments in the Brazilian state of Pará. Catchments retaining more than 69?80% forest cover lost more conservation value from disturbance than from forest loss. For example, a 20% loss of primary forest, the maximum level of deforestation allowed on Amazonian properties under Brazil?s Forest Code5, resulted in a 39?54% loss of conservation value: 96?171% more than expected without considering disturbance effects. We extrapolated the disturbance-mediated loss of conservation value throughout Pará, which covers 25% of the Brazilian Amazon. Although disturbed forests retained considerable conservation value compared with deforested areas, the to... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Biologia da conservação; Ecologia tropical. |
|
Thesagro: |
Ecologia Florestal; Floresta Tropical. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03575naa a2200505 a 4500
001 2050817
005 2025-02-27
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1038/nature18326$2DOI
100 1 $aBARLOW, J.
245 $aAnthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aConcerted political attention has focused on reducing deforestation1, 2, 3, and this remains the cornerstone of most biodiversity conservation strategies4, 5, 6. However, maintaining forest cover may not reduce anthropogenic forest disturbances, which are rarely considered in conservation programmes6. These disturbances occur both within forests, including selective logging and wildfires7, 8, and at the landscape level, through edge, area and isolation effects9. Until now, the combined effect of anthropogenic disturbance on the conservation value of remnant primary forests has remained unknown, making it impossible to assess the relative importance of forest disturbance and forest loss. Here we address these knowledge gaps using a large data set of plants, birds and dung beetles (1,538, 460 and 156 species, respectively) sampled in 36 catchments in the Brazilian state of Pará. Catchments retaining more than 69?80% forest cover lost more conservation value from disturbance than from forest loss. For example, a 20% loss of primary forest, the maximum level of deforestation allowed on Amazonian properties under Brazil?s Forest Code5, resulted in a 39?54% loss of conservation value: 96?171% more than expected without considering disturbance effects. We extrapolated the disturbance-mediated loss of conservation value throughout Pará, which covers 25% of the Brazilian Amazon. Although disturbed forests retained considerable conservation value compared with deforested areas, the toll of disturbance outside Pará?s strictly protected areas is equivalent to the loss of 92,000?139,000 km2 of primary forest. Even this lowest estimate is greater than the area deforested across the entire Brazilian Amazon between 2006 and 2015 (ref. 10). Species distribution models showed that both landscape and within-forest disturbances contributed to biodiversity loss, with the greatest negative effects on species of high conservation and functional value. These results demonstrate an urgent need for policy interventions that go beyond the maintenance of forest cover to safeguard the hyper-diversity of tropical forest ecosystems.
650 $aEcologia Florestal
650 $aFloresta Tropical
653 $aBiologia da conservação
653 $aEcologia tropical
700 1 $aLENNOX, G. D.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, J.
700 1 $aBERENGUER, E.
700 1 $aLEES, A. C.
700 1 $aNALLY, R. M.
700 1 $aTHOMSON, J. R.
700 1 $aFERRAZ, S. F. de B.
700 1 $aLOUZADA, J.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, V. H. F.
700 1 $aPARRY, L.
700 1 $aSOLAR, R. R. de C.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I. C. G.
700 1 $aARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.
700 1 $aBEGOTTI, R. A.
700 1 $aBRAGA, R. F.
700 1 $aCARDOSO, T. M.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de
700 1 $aSOUZA JUNIOR, C. M.
700 1 $aMOURA, N. G.
700 1 $aNUNES, S. S.
700 1 $aSIQUEIRA, J. V.
700 1 $aPARDINI, R.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, J. M.
700 1 $aVAZ-DE-MELLO, F. Z.
700 1 $aVEIGA, R. C. S.
700 1 $aVENTURIERI, A.
700 1 $aGARDNER, T. A.
773 $tNature$gv. 535, n. 7610, p. 144-147, July 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
