| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com ctaa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
|
Data corrente: |
01/01/2025 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/08/2025 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
FRANÇA, C. G.; ALCANTARA, M. DE; DELIZA, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
G. G. FRANÇA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; MARCELA DE ALCÂNTARA, FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA. |
|
Título: |
Effect of nutrition warning, brand, and claims on the perception of product healthiness by Brazilian consumers. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2025 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Food Research International, v. 201, 115525, 2025. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115525 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In response to the rise of Non-communicable Diseases, public policies, such as Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling, have been implemented to clarify information on food labels and promote healthier eating habits. Brazil adopted black magnifier warning label in 2020, which consists of a black rectangle with a magnifier glass fol- lowed by the expression “High in” for three critical nutrients: added sugar, saturated fat and/or sodium. This study aims to evaluate the effect of black magnifier warning label, brand, and claims on Brazilian consumers’ perceived healthiness. To achieve this, four products were considered: chocolate flavored milk, granola, mate tea, and cookies. A total of 448 Brazilian consumers took part in an online survey. For each product category, a series of packages were designed considering the following 2-level factors: brand (familiar vs. unfamiliar), black magnifier warning label (presence vs. absence), visual claim (presence vs. absence) and textual claim (presence vs. absence). Participants were shown eight pairs of packages from two of four products and were asked to select the healthiest product in each pair. The data were analyzed using a mixed logit model with random parameters, and conjoint analysis was conducted to estimate the main effects, average coefficients, and standard errors. A significance level of 5 % was considered. For all product categories, the presence of the warnings reduced perceived healthiness of products. On the other hand, the presence of familiar brand and nutritional marketing claims had a greater effect on the perceived healthiness compared to black magnifier. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of warning labels, but the need to regulate claims for strengthening label policies in the Bra-zilian context. MenosIn response to the rise of Non-communicable Diseases, public policies, such as Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling, have been implemented to clarify information on food labels and promote healthier eating habits. Brazil adopted black magnifier warning label in 2020, which consists of a black rectangle with a magnifier glass fol- lowed by the expression “High in” for three critical nutrients: added sugar, saturated fat and/or sodium. This study aims to evaluate the effect of black magnifier warning label, brand, and claims on Brazilian consumers’ perceived healthiness. To achieve this, four products were considered: chocolate flavored milk, granola, mate tea, and cookies. A total of 448 Brazilian consumers took part in an online survey. For each product category, a series of packages were designed considering the following 2-level factors: brand (familiar vs. unfamiliar), black magnifier warning label (presence vs. absence), visual claim (presence vs. absence) and textual claim (presence vs. absence). Participants were shown eight pairs of packages from two of four products and were asked to select the healthiest product in each pair. The data were analyzed using a mixed logit model with random parameters, and conjoint analysis was conducted to estimate the main effects, average coefficients, and standard errors. A significance level of 5 % was considered. For all product categories, the presence of the warnings reduced perceived healthiness of products. On the other ha... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Conjoint analysis; Consumer study; Food brand; Marketing claim; Warning labels. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Food labeling. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02527naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2171062
005 2025-08-12
008 2025 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115525$2DOI
100 1 $aFRANÇA, C. G.
245 $aEffect of nutrition warning, brand, and claims on the perception of product healthiness by Brazilian consumers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2025
520 $aIn response to the rise of Non-communicable Diseases, public policies, such as Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling, have been implemented to clarify information on food labels and promote healthier eating habits. Brazil adopted black magnifier warning label in 2020, which consists of a black rectangle with a magnifier glass fol- lowed by the expression “High in” for three critical nutrients: added sugar, saturated fat and/or sodium. This study aims to evaluate the effect of black magnifier warning label, brand, and claims on Brazilian consumers’ perceived healthiness. To achieve this, four products were considered: chocolate flavored milk, granola, mate tea, and cookies. A total of 448 Brazilian consumers took part in an online survey. For each product category, a series of packages were designed considering the following 2-level factors: brand (familiar vs. unfamiliar), black magnifier warning label (presence vs. absence), visual claim (presence vs. absence) and textual claim (presence vs. absence). Participants were shown eight pairs of packages from two of four products and were asked to select the healthiest product in each pair. The data were analyzed using a mixed logit model with random parameters, and conjoint analysis was conducted to estimate the main effects, average coefficients, and standard errors. A significance level of 5 % was considered. For all product categories, the presence of the warnings reduced perceived healthiness of products. On the other hand, the presence of familiar brand and nutritional marketing claims had a greater effect on the perceived healthiness compared to black magnifier. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of warning labels, but the need to regulate claims for strengthening label policies in the Bra-zilian context.
650 $aFood labeling
653 $aConjoint analysis
653 $aConsumer study
653 $aFood brand
653 $aMarketing claim
653 $aWarning labels
700 1 $aALCANTARA, M. DE
700 1 $aDELIZA, R.
773 $tFood Research International$gv. 201, 115525, 2025.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (CTAA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | MILIOLI, A. S.; MEIRA, D.; PANHO, M. C.; MANDELLA, L. A.; WOYANN, L. G.; TODESCHINI, M. H.; ZDZIARSKI, A. D.; CAMPAGNOLLI, O. R.; MENEGAZZI, C. P.; COLONELLI, L. L.; FERNANDES, R. A. T.; MELO, C. L. P. de; OLIVEIRA, M. F. de; BERTAGNOLLI, P. F.; ARIAS, C. A. A.; GIASSON, N. F.; MATSUMOTO, M. N.; QUIROGA, M; SILVA, R. R.; BERTAN, I.; CAPELIN, M. A.; MATEI, G.; BENIN, G. Genetic improvement of soybeans in Brazil: South and Midwest regions. Crop Science, v. 62, n. 6, p. 2276-2293, 2022.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Trigo. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
