| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/10/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/01/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
ALVES, C. P.; JARDIM, A. M. da Ro F.; ARAÚJO JÚNIOR, C. do N.; SOUZA, L. S. B. de; ARAUJO, G. G. L. de; SOUZA, C. A. A. de; SALVADOR, K. R. da S.; LEITE, R. M. C.; PINHEIRO, A. G.; SILVA, T. G. F. da. |
|
Afiliação: |
CLEBER PEREIRA ALVES, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada, PE; ALEXANDRE MANIÇOBA DA ROSA FERRAZ JARDIM, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife; GEORGE DO NASCIMENTO ARAÚJO JÚNIOR, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife; LUCIANA SANDRA BASTOS DE SOUZA, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada; GHERMAN GARCIA LEAL DE ARAUJO, CPATSA; CARLOS ANDRÉ ALVES DE SOUZA, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife; KAIQUE RENAN DA SILVA SALVADOR, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada; RENAN MATHEUS CORDEIRO LEITE, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada; ANTONIO GEBSON PINHEIRO, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife; THIERES GEORGE FREIRE DA SILVA, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada. |
|
Título: |
How to enhance the agronomic performance of cactus-sorghum intercropped system: planting configurations, density and orientation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Industrial Crops and Products, v. 184, 115059, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115059 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Clarifying cultivation techniques and making production systems more efficient are practices that have been much sought after in agricultural systems in recent decades. In this context, the forage yield, biological efficiency, and competitive ability, of different cultivation strategies for intercropping forage cactus and sorghum were determined in biosaline production systems from 2018 to 2020 in Brazil. Four experiments were carried out, comprising: 1) cropping configurations for the forage cactus-sorghum intercropping system; 2 and 3) planting densities for the forage cactus intercropped with sorghum with an east-west and north-south row orientation, respectively; and 4) planting densities for the forage cactus and sorghum. Each experiment used a randomised block design with four replications. The intercropped forage cactus and sorghum showed higher productivity than the monocropped systems. The indices of biological efficiency (LER, ATER, LEC and SPI with mean values equal to 1.6, 1.8, 0.6 and 29.0, respectively) and competitive ability (ALGY in average 870.6) show better performance under the intercropped system compared to the single crops. The increased planting density resulted in an increase in productivity under the intercropped forage cactus-sorghum system (on average an increase of 69.4% dry matter). In turn, the orientation had no influence on the productivity of the intercropping system but offered better conditions for the forage cactus when cultivation was in an east-west direction (21.7 Mg ha 1 of dry matter) compared to north-south (17.5 Mg ha 1 of dry matter). Intercropping forage cactus and sorghum using biosaline agriculture is an excellent alternative for a production system in semi-arid environments, especially at higher planting densities (50,000 and 100,000 plants ha 1). MenosClarifying cultivation techniques and making production systems more efficient are practices that have been much sought after in agricultural systems in recent decades. In this context, the forage yield, biological efficiency, and competitive ability, of different cultivation strategies for intercropping forage cactus and sorghum were determined in biosaline production systems from 2018 to 2020 in Brazil. Four experiments were carried out, comprising: 1) cropping configurations for the forage cactus-sorghum intercropping system; 2 and 3) planting densities for the forage cactus intercropped with sorghum with an east-west and north-south row orientation, respectively; and 4) planting densities for the forage cactus and sorghum. Each experiment used a randomised block design with four replications. The intercropped forage cactus and sorghum showed higher productivity than the monocropped systems. The indices of biological efficiency (LER, ATER, LEC and SPI with mean values equal to 1.6, 1.8, 0.6 and 29.0, respectively) and competitive ability (ALGY in average 870.6) show better performance under the intercropped system compared to the single crops. The increased planting density resulted in an increase in productivity under the intercropped forage cactus-sorghum system (on average an increase of 69.4% dry matter). In turn, the orientation had no influence on the productivity of the intercropping system but offered better conditions for the forage cactus when cultivation was in... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Rendimento da colheita; Resiliência agrícola. |
|
Thesagro: |
Nopalea Cochenillifera; Palma Forrageira; Pastagem; Pastagem Consorciada; Sorgo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Crop yield; Opuntia stricta; Sorghum bicolor subsp. bicolor. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1147124/1/How-to-enhance-the-agronomic-performance-of-cactus-sorghum-2022.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03014naa a2200361 a 4500
001 2147124
005 2023-01-13
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115059$2DOI
100 1 $aALVES, C. P.
245 $aHow to enhance the agronomic performance of cactus-sorghum intercropped system$bplanting configurations, density and orientation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aClarifying cultivation techniques and making production systems more efficient are practices that have been much sought after in agricultural systems in recent decades. In this context, the forage yield, biological efficiency, and competitive ability, of different cultivation strategies for intercropping forage cactus and sorghum were determined in biosaline production systems from 2018 to 2020 in Brazil. Four experiments were carried out, comprising: 1) cropping configurations for the forage cactus-sorghum intercropping system; 2 and 3) planting densities for the forage cactus intercropped with sorghum with an east-west and north-south row orientation, respectively; and 4) planting densities for the forage cactus and sorghum. Each experiment used a randomised block design with four replications. The intercropped forage cactus and sorghum showed higher productivity than the monocropped systems. The indices of biological efficiency (LER, ATER, LEC and SPI with mean values equal to 1.6, 1.8, 0.6 and 29.0, respectively) and competitive ability (ALGY in average 870.6) show better performance under the intercropped system compared to the single crops. The increased planting density resulted in an increase in productivity under the intercropped forage cactus-sorghum system (on average an increase of 69.4% dry matter). In turn, the orientation had no influence on the productivity of the intercropping system but offered better conditions for the forage cactus when cultivation was in an east-west direction (21.7 Mg ha 1 of dry matter) compared to north-south (17.5 Mg ha 1 of dry matter). Intercropping forage cactus and sorghum using biosaline agriculture is an excellent alternative for a production system in semi-arid environments, especially at higher planting densities (50,000 and 100,000 plants ha 1).
650 $aCrop yield
650 $aOpuntia stricta
650 $aSorghum bicolor subsp. bicolor
650 $aNopalea Cochenillifera
650 $aPalma Forrageira
650 $aPastagem
650 $aPastagem Consorciada
650 $aSorgo
653 $aRendimento da colheita
653 $aResiliência agrícola
700 1 $aJARDIM, A. M. da Ro F.
700 1 $aARAÚJO JÚNIOR, C. do N.
700 1 $aSOUZA, L. S. B. de
700 1 $aARAUJO, G. G. L. de
700 1 $aSOUZA, C. A. A. de
700 1 $aSALVADOR, K. R. da S.
700 1 $aLEITE, R. M. C.
700 1 $aPINHEIRO, A. G.
700 1 $aSILVA, T. G. F. da
773 $tIndustrial Crops and Products$gv. 184, 115059, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/02/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
WIJAYAWARDENE, N. N.; HYDE, K. D.; DAI, D. Q.; SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, M; GOTO, B. T.; SAXENA, R. K.; ERDOGDU, M.; SELÇUK, F.; RAJESHKUMAR, K. C.; APTROOT, A.; BLASZKOWSKI, J.; BOONYUEN, N.; SILVA, G. A. da; SOUZA, F. A. de; DONG, W.; ERTZ, D.; HAELEWATERS, D.; JONES, E. B. G.; KARUNARATHNA, S. C.; KIRK, P. M.; KUKWA, M.; KUMLA, J.; LEONTYEV, D. V.; LUMBSCH, H. T.; MAHARACHCHIKUMBURA, S. S. N.; MARGUNO, F.; MARTÍNEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, P.; MESIC, A.; MONTEIRO, J. S.; OEHL, F.; PAWLOWSKA, J.; PEM, D.; PFLIEGLER, W. P.; PHILLIPS, A. J. L.; POSTA, A.; HE, M. Q.; LI, J. X.; RAZA, M.; SRUTHI, O. P.; SUETRONG, S.; SUWANNARACH, N.; EDERSOO, L.; THIYAGARAJA, V.; TIBPROMMA, S.; TKALCEC, Z.; TOKAREV, Y. S.; WANASINGHE, D. N.; WIJESUNDARA, D. S. A.; WIMALASEANA, S. D. M. K.; MADRID, H.; ZHANG, G. Q.; GAO, Y.; SÁNCHEZ-CASTRO, I.; TANG, L. Z.; STADLER, M.; YURKOV, A.; THINES, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
Qujing Normal University; Mae Fah Luang University; Qujing Normal University; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; University Road; Kirsehir Ahi Evran University; Kirsehir Ahi Evran University; National Fungal Culture Collection of India -NFCCI; Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul; West Pomeranian University of Technology; National Science and Technology Development Agency -NSTDA; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; FRANCISCO ADRIANO DE SOUZA, CNPMS; Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering; Botanic Garden Meise; University of South Bohemia; King Saud University; Kunming Institute of Botany; Royal Botanic Gardens; University of Gdansk; Chiang Mai University; Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University; The Field Museum; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; University of Silesia in Katowice; Universidad de Granada; Ruder Boskovic Institute; Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; Agroscope, Plant Protection Products - Impact and Assessment, Team Applied Ecotoxicology; University of Warsaw; Mae Fah Luang Universit; University of Debrecen; Universidade de Lisboa; Ruder Boskovic Institute; Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Fungal Culture Collection of India -NFCCI; National Science and Technology Development Agency -NSTDA; Chiang Mai University; University of Tartu; Mae Fah Luang University; Kunming Institute of Botany; Ruder Boskovic Institute; All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection; Kunming Institute of Botany; National Institute of Fundamental Studies; University of Ruhuna; University of Ruhuna; Qujing Normal University; Qujing Normal University; Estación Experimental del Zaidín; Jiangxi normal University; Technische Universitat Braunschweig; Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures; Goethe University. |
|
Título: |
Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa-2021. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Mycosphere, v. 13, n. 1, p. 53-453, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This paper provides an updated classification of the Kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi) and fungus-like taxa. Five-hundred and twenty-three (535) notes are provided for newly introduced taxa and for changes that have been made since the previous outline. In the discussion, the latest taxonomic changes in Basidiomycota are provided and the classification of Mycosphaerellales are broadly discussed. Genera listed in Mycosphaerellaceae have been confirmed by DNA sequence analyses, while doubtful genera (DNA sequences being unavailable but traditionally accommodated in Mycosphaerellaceae) are listed in the discussion. Problematic genera in Glomeromycota are also discussed based on phylogenetic results. |
|
Thesagro: |
Fungo. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amblyosporidae; Ascomycota; Basidiomycota; Microsporidia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/231907/1/Outline-fungi.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02938naa a2200865 a 4500
001 2140383
005 2022-12-05
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2$2DOI
100 1 $aWIJAYAWARDENE, N. N.
245 $aOutline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa-2021.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aThis paper provides an updated classification of the Kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi) and fungus-like taxa. Five-hundred and twenty-three (535) notes are provided for newly introduced taxa and for changes that have been made since the previous outline. In the discussion, the latest taxonomic changes in Basidiomycota are provided and the classification of Mycosphaerellales are broadly discussed. Genera listed in Mycosphaerellaceae have been confirmed by DNA sequence analyses, while doubtful genera (DNA sequences being unavailable but traditionally accommodated in Mycosphaerellaceae) are listed in the discussion. Problematic genera in Glomeromycota are also discussed based on phylogenetic results.
650 $aAmblyosporidae
650 $aAscomycota
650 $aBasidiomycota
650 $aMicrosporidia
650 $aFungo
700 1 $aHYDE, K. D.
700 1 $aDAI, D. Q.
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, M
700 1 $aGOTO, B. T.
700 1 $aSAXENA, R. K.
700 1 $aERDOGDU, M.
700 1 $aSELÇUK, F.
700 1 $aRAJESHKUMAR, K. C.
700 1 $aAPTROOT, A.
700 1 $aBLASZKOWSKI, J.
700 1 $aBOONYUEN, N.
700 1 $aSILVA, G. A. da
700 1 $aSOUZA, F. A. de
700 1 $aDONG, W.
700 1 $aERTZ, D.
700 1 $aHAELEWATERS, D.
700 1 $aJONES, E. B. G.
700 1 $aKARUNARATHNA, S. C.
700 1 $aKIRK, P. M.
700 1 $aKUKWA, M.
700 1 $aKUMLA, J.
700 1 $aLEONTYEV, D. V.
700 1 $aLUMBSCH, H. T.
700 1 $aMAHARACHCHIKUMBURA, S. S. N.
700 1 $aMARGUNO, F.
700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, P.
700 1 $aMESIC, A.
700 1 $aMONTEIRO, J. S.
700 1 $aOEHL, F.
700 1 $aPAWLOWSKA, J.
700 1 $aPEM, D.
700 1 $aPFLIEGLER, W. P.
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, A. J. L.
700 1 $aPOSTA, A.
700 1 $aHE, M. Q.
700 1 $aLI, J. X.
700 1 $aRAZA, M.
700 1 $aSRUTHI, O. P.
700 1 $aSUETRONG, S.
700 1 $aSUWANNARACH, N.
700 1 $aEDERSOO, L.
700 1 $aTHIYAGARAJA, V.
700 1 $aTIBPROMMA, S.
700 1 $aTKALCEC, Z.
700 1 $aTOKAREV, Y. S.
700 1 $aWANASINGHE, D. N.
700 1 $aWIJESUNDARA, D. S. A.
700 1 $aWIMALASEANA, S. D. M. K.
700 1 $aMADRID, H.
700 1 $aZHANG, G. Q.
700 1 $aGAO, Y.
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ-CASTRO, I.
700 1 $aTANG, L. Z.
700 1 $aSTADLER, M.
700 1 $aYURKOV, A.
700 1 $aTHINES, M.
773 $tMycosphere$gv. 13, n. 1, p. 53-453, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
