|
|
Registros recuperados : 12 | |
3. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | ZANATTA, J. A.; SALTON, J. C.; BAYER, C.; TOMAZI, M.; COLMAN, I.; LOPEZ, A. Emissões de gases de efeito estufa em sistemas de manejo do solo durante ciclo de produção da soja no Cerrado. In: REUNIÃO PARANAENSE DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 2., 2011, Curitiba. Resumos. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná; Sociedade Paranaense de Ciência do Solo, 2011. p. 24. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
5. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | SALTON, J. C.; TOMAZI, M.; COMUNELLO, E.; ZANATTA, J. A.; RABELLO, L. M. Condutividade elétrica e atributos físicos e químicos de um Latossolo após 15 anos sob sistemas de manejo em Mato Grosso do Sul. In: INAMASU, R. Y.; NAIME, J. de M.; RESENDE, A. V. de; BASSOI, L. H.; BERNARDI, A. C. de C. (Ed.). Agricultura de precisão: um novo olhar. São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação, 2011. p. 254-260. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
7. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | SALTON, J. C.; MERCANTE, F. M.; TOMAZI, M.; ZANATTA, J. A.; CONCENCO, G.; SILVA, W. M.; RETORE, M. Integrated crop-livestock system in Dourados, Brazil: a sustainable production system. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS, 2., 2012, Porto Alegre. Invited papers; Offered papers. [S.l.]: INRA, 2012. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Florestas. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
8. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | SALTON, J. C.; MERCANTE, F. M.; TOMAZI, M.; ZANATTA, J. A.; CONCENCO, G.; SILVA, W. M.; RETORE, M. Integrated crop-livestock system in tropical Brazil: toward a sustainable production system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Amsterdan, v. 190, p. 70-79, June 2014. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Florestas. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso restrito ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/lock.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
9. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | PIVA, J. T.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ZANATTA, J. A.; MORAES, A. de; PAULETTI, V.; TOMAZI, M.; PERGHER, M. No-till reduces global warming potential in a subtropical Ferralsol. Plant and Soil, v. 361, p. 359-373, 2012. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso restrito ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/lock.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
10. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | PIVA, J. T.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ZANATTA, J. A.; MORAES, A. de; TOMAZI, M.; PAULETTI, V.; BARTH, G.; PICCOLO, M. de C. Soil gaseous N2O and CH4 emissions and carbon pool due to integrated crop-livestock in a subtropical Ferralsol. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 87-93, 2014. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Florestas. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso restrito ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/lock.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
11. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | SORDI, A.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ALBUQUERQUE, M. A.; PIVA, J. T.; ZANATTA, J. A.; TOMAZI, M.; ROSA, C. M. da; MORAES, A. de. Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 94-103, 2014. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso restrito ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/lock.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
Registros recuperados : 12 | |
|
|
![](/consulta/web/img/deny.png) | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
10/11/2014 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2014 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
SORDI, A.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ALBUQUERQUE, M. A.; PIVA, J. T.; ZANATTA, J. A.; TOMAZI, M.; ROSA, C. M. da; MORAES, A. de. |
Afiliação: |
ANDRÉ SORDI, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; Jeferson Dieckow, UFPR; Cimélio Bayer, UFRGS; MÁRCIO AMARAL ALBUQUERQUE, Programa de pós-graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; JONATAS THIAGO PIVA, UFSC; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; Michely Tomazi, UFRGS; CARLA MACHADO DA ROSA, UFRGS; Anibal de Moraes, UFPR. |
Título: |
Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland. |
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 94-103, 2014. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
tCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil. MenostCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or d... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Fator de emissão; Óxido nitroso; Volume de urina. |
Thesagro: |
Gado; Nitrato; Pastagem. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 03383naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1999594 005 2014-11-10 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSORDI, A. 245 $aNitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2014 520 $atCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil. 650 $aGado 650 $aNitrato 650 $aPastagem 653 $aFator de emissão 653 $aÓxido nitroso 653 $aVolume de urina 700 1 $aDIECKOW, J. 700 1 $aBAYER, C. 700 1 $aALBUQUERQUE, M. A. 700 1 $aPIVA, J. T. 700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A. 700 1 $aTOMAZI, M. 700 1 $aROSA, C. M. da 700 1 $aMORAES, A. de 773 $tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment$gv. 190, p. 94-103, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|