| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 296 | |
| 66. |  | COSTA, R. G. F.; OLIVEIRA, C. R. de; MATTOSO, L. H. C. Nanofibras de poli(&-caprolactona)/TIO2 preparadas pela técnica de fiação por sopro em solução. In: WORKSHOP DA REDE DE NANOTECNOLOGIA APLICADA AO AGRONEGÓCIO, 9., 2017, São Carlos. Anais ... São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação, 2017. p. 520-522. Editores: Caue Ribeiro de Oliveira, Elaine Cristina Paris, Luiz Henrique Capparelli Mattoso, Marcelo Porto Bemquerer, Maria Alice Martins, Odílio Benedito Garrido de Assis.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|    |
| 69. | | PERES, J. A.; COSTA, R. G. F.; OLIVEIRA, C. R. de; MATTOSO, L. H. C. Otimização dos parâmetros de eletrofiação para a preparação de nanocompósitos. In: JORNADA CIENTÍFICA - EMBRAPA SÃO CARLOS, 4., 2012, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 2012. p. 73. Editores técnicos: João de Mendonça Naime, Lucimara Aparecida Forato, Maria Alice Martins, Ladislau Marcelino Rabello, Rubens Bernardes Filho. (Embrapa Instrumentação. Documentos, 56)| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| 73. | | RAMOS, J. L. de F.; COSTA, R. G.; MEDEIROS, A. N. de. Desempenho produtivo de cabritos submetidos a diferentes períodos de aleitamento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, Viçosa, MG, v. 33, n. 3, p. 684-690, maio/jun., 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
| |
| 75. | | ANDRADE, A. P. de; COSTA, R. G. da; SANTOS, E. M.; SILVA, D. S. da. Produção animal no semiárido: o desafio de disponibilizar forragem, em quantidade e com qualidade, na estação seca. Tecnololgia & Ciência Agropecuária, João Pessoa, v. 4, n. 4, p. 1-14, dez. 2010. Trabalho apresentado no 3º Simpósio Internacional sobre Caprinos e Ovinos de Corte (SINCORTE), em João Pessoa, Paraíba, Novembro 2007.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
| |
| 77. | | COSTA, R. G. F.; PERES, J. A.; RIBEIRO, C.; MATTOSO, L. H. C. Estudo de nanocompósitos carregados com nanopartículas de dióxido de titânio (TiO2) e prata (Ag). In: WORKSHOP DA REDE DE NANOTECNOLOGIA APLICADA AO AGRONEGÓCIO, 7.; ESCOLA DE NANOTECNOLOGIA, 3., 2013, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos, SP: Embrapa Instrumentação, 2013. p. 309-311 Editores: Maria Alice Martins, Odílio Benedito Garrido de Assis, Caue Ribeiro, Luiz Henrique Capparelli Mattoso. CD-ROM. Editores: Maria Alice Martins, Odílio Benedito Garrido de Assis, Caue Ribeiro, Luiz Henrique Capparelli Mattoso.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| 78. | | PERES, J. A.; COSTA, R. G. F.; OLIVEIRA, C. R. de; MATTOSO, L. H. C. Estudo de nanocompósitos contendo nanopartículas inorgânicas. In: JORNADA CIENTÍFICA - EMBRAPA SÃO CARLOS, 4., 2012, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 2012. p. 72. Editores técnicos: João de Mendonça Naime, Lucimara Aparecida Forato, Maria Alice Martins, Ladislau Marcelino Rabello, Rubens Bernardes Filho. (Embrapa Instrumentação. Documentos, 56)| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 296 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Leite. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgl.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/11/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/08/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Nota Técnica/Nota Científica |
|
Autoria: |
FERNANDES, C. A. C.; PEREIRA, G. H. S.; SIQUEIRA, L. G. B.; NERI, H. L. D. H.; VIANA, J. H. M.; PALHAO, M. P.; TEODORO, R. A. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
C. A. C. FERNANDES, UNIFENAS; G. H. S. PEREIRA, UNIFENAS; LUIZ GUSTAVO BRUNO SIQUEIRA, CNPGL; H. L. D. H. NERI, BIOTRAN BIOTECNOLOGIA; JOAO HENRIQUE MOREIRA VIANA, Cenargen; M. P. PALHAO, UNIFENAS; R. A. S. TEODORO, UNIFENAS. |
|
Título: |
Short communication: does previous superovulation affect fertility in dairy heifers? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Dairy Science, v. 103, n. 11, p. 10862-10866, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18386 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential negative effects of superovulation on subsequent fertility of dairy heifers. Holstein heifers (n = 1,783), 312 to 387 d of age, and 273 to 307 kg of body weight (BW) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. These animals were first selected to be donors (446) or nondonors (CON, n = 1,327) according to their genomic values. Nondonor heifers (CON) were artificially inseminated (AI) according to standard procedures of each farm after reaching 320 kg of BW. Donor heifers were superovulated using a fixed FSH dose (180 mg NIH-FSH-P1; Folltropin-V, Vetoquinol Brasil, Mairiporã, SP, Brazil) and embryos were collected following standard procedures. Heifers that produced fewer than 8 viable embryos after first superovulation (SOV1, n = 337) were no longer used as donors, whereas the remaining heifers (SOV2, n = 109) were superovulated a second time within an interval of 48 to 54 d. Donor heifers (SOV1 and SOV2) were AI once they reached 320 kg of BW, at least 15 d after the last embryo collection. Data on age at first AI, at conception, and at parturition, as well as the number of services per conception, were analyzed by ANOVA, using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) procedure. Binomial variables (pregnancy per AI, overall pregnancy rate, open heifers at 500 d age, and late pregnancy loss) were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. The heifers selected to undergo superovulation twice (SOV2) yielded more total (12.6 ± 5.3 vs. 6.8 ± 4.6; respectively) and viable embryos (8.5 ± 3.8 vs. 3.9 ± 2.8; respectively) than those superovulated only once (SOV1). Age at first AI, conception, and at parturition was greater in SOV2, but not in SOV1 compared with nondonor controls. In addition, pregnancy per first AI, overall pregnancy rate, services per conception, open heifers at 500 d of age, and occurrence of pregnancy losses after 60 d of gestation were similar among CON, SOV1, and SOV2 heifers. In summary, a single superovulation performed before heifers reach a minimum weight for breeding did not affect age at conception, calving or other indicators of reproductive efficiency. On the other hand, heifers superovulated twice were first inseminated at a later age than their birth cohorts, but had similar reproductive performance. MenosThe aim of this study was to evaluate the potential negative effects of superovulation on subsequent fertility of dairy heifers. Holstein heifers (n = 1,783), 312 to 387 d of age, and 273 to 307 kg of body weight (BW) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. These animals were first selected to be donors (446) or nondonors (CON, n = 1,327) according to their genomic values. Nondonor heifers (CON) were artificially inseminated (AI) according to standard procedures of each farm after reaching 320 kg of BW. Donor heifers were superovulated using a fixed FSH dose (180 mg NIH-FSH-P1; Folltropin-V, Vetoquinol Brasil, Mairiporã, SP, Brazil) and embryos were collected following standard procedures. Heifers that produced fewer than 8 viable embryos after first superovulation (SOV1, n = 337) were no longer used as donors, whereas the remaining heifers (SOV2, n = 109) were superovulated a second time within an interval of 48 to 54 d. Donor heifers (SOV1 and SOV2) were AI once they reached 320 kg of BW, at least 15 d after the last embryo collection. Data on age at first AI, at conception, and at parturition, as well as the number of services per conception, were analyzed by ANOVA, using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) procedure. Binomial variables (pregnancy per AI, overall pregnancy rate, open heifers at 500 d age, and late pregnancy loss) were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. The heifers selected to undergo superovulation twice (SOV2) yielded ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bovine. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biotecnologia; Bovino; Fertilidade Animal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biotechnology; Reproductive efficiency. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03177naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2133326
005 2021-08-11
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18386$2DOI
100 1 $aFERNANDES, C. A. C.
245 $aShort communication$bdoes previous superovulation affect fertility in dairy heifers?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThe aim of this study was to evaluate the potential negative effects of superovulation on subsequent fertility of dairy heifers. Holstein heifers (n = 1,783), 312 to 387 d of age, and 273 to 307 kg of body weight (BW) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. These animals were first selected to be donors (446) or nondonors (CON, n = 1,327) according to their genomic values. Nondonor heifers (CON) were artificially inseminated (AI) according to standard procedures of each farm after reaching 320 kg of BW. Donor heifers were superovulated using a fixed FSH dose (180 mg NIH-FSH-P1; Folltropin-V, Vetoquinol Brasil, Mairiporã, SP, Brazil) and embryos were collected following standard procedures. Heifers that produced fewer than 8 viable embryos after first superovulation (SOV1, n = 337) were no longer used as donors, whereas the remaining heifers (SOV2, n = 109) were superovulated a second time within an interval of 48 to 54 d. Donor heifers (SOV1 and SOV2) were AI once they reached 320 kg of BW, at least 15 d after the last embryo collection. Data on age at first AI, at conception, and at parturition, as well as the number of services per conception, were analyzed by ANOVA, using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) procedure. Binomial variables (pregnancy per AI, overall pregnancy rate, open heifers at 500 d age, and late pregnancy loss) were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. The heifers selected to undergo superovulation twice (SOV2) yielded more total (12.6 ± 5.3 vs. 6.8 ± 4.6; respectively) and viable embryos (8.5 ± 3.8 vs. 3.9 ± 2.8; respectively) than those superovulated only once (SOV1). Age at first AI, conception, and at parturition was greater in SOV2, but not in SOV1 compared with nondonor controls. In addition, pregnancy per first AI, overall pregnancy rate, services per conception, open heifers at 500 d of age, and occurrence of pregnancy losses after 60 d of gestation were similar among CON, SOV1, and SOV2 heifers. In summary, a single superovulation performed before heifers reach a minimum weight for breeding did not affect age at conception, calving or other indicators of reproductive efficiency. On the other hand, heifers superovulated twice were first inseminated at a later age than their birth cohorts, but had similar reproductive performance.
650 $aBiotechnology
650 $aReproductive efficiency
650 $aBiotecnologia
650 $aBovino
650 $aFertilidade Animal
653 $aBovine
700 1 $aPEREIRA, G. H. S.
700 1 $aSIQUEIRA, L. G. B.
700 1 $aNERI, H. L. D. H.
700 1 $aVIANA, J. H. M.
700 1 $aPALHAO, M. P.
700 1 $aTEODORO, R. A. S.
773 $tJournal of Dairy Science$gv. 103, n. 11, p. 10862-10866, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
