| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 74 | |
| 16. |  | LACERDA, A. E. B. de; KUNIYOSHI, Y. S.; GALVÃO, F. Estudo fitossociológico de vegetação secundária em área de contato entre a Floresta Ombrófila Densa e Mista - Mananciais da Serra - Piraquara - PR. In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS AND EXHIBITION ON FOREST, 5., 1999, Curitiba. Forest 99: [resumos]. Rio de Janeiro: BIOSFERA, 1999. 1 CD-ROM. Autoria bilíngue: CONGRESSO E EXPOSICAO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE FLORESTAS, 5., 1999, Curitiba.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|   |
| Registros recuperados : 74 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/02/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/02/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GARRASTAZU, M. C.; MENDONÇA, S. D.; HOROKOSKIA, T. T.; CARDOSO, D. J.; ROSOT, M. A. D.; NIMMO, E. R.; LACERDA, A. E. B. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARILICE CORDEIRO GARRASTAZU, CNPF; Sabina D. Mendonça, Bolsista da Embrapa Florestas; Teçá T. Horokoskia, Bolsista da Embrapa Florestas; DENISE JETON CARDOSO, CNPF; MARIA AUGUSTA DOETZER ROSOT, CNPF; Evelyn R. Nimmo, ER Nimmo Consulting; ANDRE EDUARDO BISCAIA DE LACERDA, CNPF. |
|
Título: |
Carbon sequestration and riparian zones: assessing the impacts ofchanging regulatory practices in Southern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Land Use Policy, v. 42, p. 329-339, 2015. |
|
DOI: |
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.003 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Despite the consensus that riparian zones are important for the conservation of biological diversity andmany other ecosystem services, there are no consistent regulations for how, or if, riparian areas shouldbe used and the size of buffer zones required. Recently, controversial revisions to the Forest Code inBrazil have been implemented which include a reduction in the width of protected riparian buffer zonesrequired along rivers. In order to model the impact of legislative changes on ecosystem services, weused the integrated valuation of environmental services and tradeoffs (InVEST) tool to assess a 30,000 hawatershed in southern Brazil and carbon sequestration as an indicator for ecosystem services. The resultsdemonstrate that the adoption of improved agriculture practices, development of secondary forests andespecially the conversion of land into more restrictive types of land-use has a significant and positiveimpact on the levels of carbon sequestered. On the other hand, the easing of riparian zone requirementsshows an important potential loss in carbon sequestration. More importantly, reducing the size of thebuffer zone might result in land-conversion into agriculture or pasture, impacting both carbon seques-tration and other ecosystem services. However, the easing of restrictions on riparian areas under therevised Forest Code might be overshadowed by changes to Legal Forest Reserve provisions which couldhave a much greater impact on carbon sequestration. Despite the restrictions imposed by various piecesof legislation, the loss of ecosystem services due to a reduction in the protected riparian area, as well aspossible land conversion due to changes in Legal Forest Reserves, are possible unless efforts involvingnarrowing the gap between research and policy, effective law enforcement, and implementing attrac-tive payment for ecosystem services programs, are put in place. We believe that introducing incentivesto farmers to maintain the protection of riparian areas by implementing agroforestry systems, such aserva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis), would be beneficial socioeconomically and ecologically and should beintegrated into the Forest Code. MenosDespite the consensus that riparian zones are important for the conservation of biological diversity andmany other ecosystem services, there are no consistent regulations for how, or if, riparian areas shouldbe used and the size of buffer zones required. Recently, controversial revisions to the Forest Code inBrazil have been implemented which include a reduction in the width of protected riparian buffer zonesrequired along rivers. In order to model the impact of legislative changes on ecosystem services, weused the integrated valuation of environmental services and tradeoffs (InVEST) tool to assess a 30,000 hawatershed in southern Brazil and carbon sequestration as an indicator for ecosystem services. The resultsdemonstrate that the adoption of improved agriculture practices, development of secondary forests andespecially the conversion of land into more restrictive types of land-use has a significant and positiveimpact on the levels of carbon sequestered. On the other hand, the easing of riparian zone requirementsshows an important potential loss in carbon sequestration. More importantly, reducing the size of thebuffer zone might result in land-conversion into agriculture or pasture, impacting both carbon seques-tration and other ecosystem services. However, the easing of restrictions on riparian areas under therevised Forest Code might be overshadowed by changes to Legal Forest Reserve provisions which couldhave a much greater impact on carbon sequestration. Despite the re... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural incentives; Incentivo agrícola; InVEST; Manejo florestal; Prática regulatória; Riparian zones; Sequestro de carbono; Zona ripária. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
carbon sequestration; ecosystem services; forest management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03221naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2008103
005 2016-02-15
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $adx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.003$2DOI
100 1 $aGARRASTAZU, M. C.
245 $aCarbon sequestration and riparian zones$bassessing the impacts ofchanging regulatory practices in Southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
520 $aDespite the consensus that riparian zones are important for the conservation of biological diversity andmany other ecosystem services, there are no consistent regulations for how, or if, riparian areas shouldbe used and the size of buffer zones required. Recently, controversial revisions to the Forest Code inBrazil have been implemented which include a reduction in the width of protected riparian buffer zonesrequired along rivers. In order to model the impact of legislative changes on ecosystem services, weused the integrated valuation of environmental services and tradeoffs (InVEST) tool to assess a 30,000 hawatershed in southern Brazil and carbon sequestration as an indicator for ecosystem services. The resultsdemonstrate that the adoption of improved agriculture practices, development of secondary forests andespecially the conversion of land into more restrictive types of land-use has a significant and positiveimpact on the levels of carbon sequestered. On the other hand, the easing of riparian zone requirementsshows an important potential loss in carbon sequestration. More importantly, reducing the size of thebuffer zone might result in land-conversion into agriculture or pasture, impacting both carbon seques-tration and other ecosystem services. However, the easing of restrictions on riparian areas under therevised Forest Code might be overshadowed by changes to Legal Forest Reserve provisions which couldhave a much greater impact on carbon sequestration. Despite the restrictions imposed by various piecesof legislation, the loss of ecosystem services due to a reduction in the protected riparian area, as well aspossible land conversion due to changes in Legal Forest Reserves, are possible unless efforts involvingnarrowing the gap between research and policy, effective law enforcement, and implementing attrac-tive payment for ecosystem services programs, are put in place. We believe that introducing incentivesto farmers to maintain the protection of riparian areas by implementing agroforestry systems, such aserva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis), would be beneficial socioeconomically and ecologically and should beintegrated into the Forest Code.
650 $acarbon sequestration
650 $aecosystem services
650 $aforest management
653 $aAgricultural incentives
653 $aIncentivo agrícola
653 $aInVEST
653 $aManejo florestal
653 $aPrática regulatória
653 $aRiparian zones
653 $aSequestro de carbono
653 $aZona ripária
700 1 $aMENDONÇA, S. D.
700 1 $aHOROKOSKIA, T. T.
700 1 $aCARDOSO, D. J.
700 1 $aROSOT, M. A. D.
700 1 $aNIMMO, E. R.
700 1 $aLACERDA, A. E. B. de
773 $tLand Use Policy$gv. 42, p. 329-339, 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
