| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 125 | |
| 84. |  | HOEFLICH, V. A.; MEDRADO, M, J S.; ALVES, M. V. G.; KOEHLER, H. S. The Brazilian forest sector: challenges and strategies for its development. In: IUFRO World Congress, 22., 2005, Brisbane. Forests in the balance: linking tradition and technology: program & abstracts. [Vienna]: IUFRO, 2005. 1 CD-ROM. Também publicado no The International Forestry Review, Oxford, v. 7, n. 5, p.112, Aug. 2005. Resumo.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| 85. | | HOEFLICH, V. A.; CONTO, A. J. de; BITTENCOURT, S. M.; WORHL, J. H. O consumo de lenha na industrializacao da erva-mate. In: CONGRESSO SUL-AMERICANO DA ERVA-MATE, 1.; REUNIAO TECNICA DO CONE SUL SOBRE A CULTURA DA ERVA-MATE, 2., 1997, Curitiba. Anais. Colombo: EMBRAPA-CNPF, 1997. p. 405. (EMBRAPA-CNPF. Documentos, 33).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 88. | | FERNANDES, A. P. D.; GUIMARÃES, P. P.; BRAZ, E. M.; HOEFLICH, V. A.; ARCE, J. E. Alternativas de planejamento para a exploração florestal. Floresta, Curitiba, v. 43, n. 3, p. 339-350, jul./set. 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 99. | | HOEFLICH, V. A.; CRUZ, E. R. da; PEREIRA, J.; DUQUE, F. F.; TOLLINI, H. Sistema de produção agrícola no cerrado. Brasília, DF: EMBRAPA-DDM, 1976. 32 p. Trabalho apresentado no IV Simpósio sobre o Cerrado, Brasília, DF, 1976.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 100. | | HOEFLICH, V. A.; CRUZ, E. R.; PEREIRA, J.; DUQUE, F. F. TOLLINI, H. Sistema de produção agricola no Cerrado. In: SIMPÓSIO SOBRE O CERRADO, 4., 1976, Brasília, DF. Bases para utilização agropecuária. São Paulo: EDUSP; Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia, 1977. p. 37-58. (Coleção reconquista do Brasil, 38).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 125 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/10/2007 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
Internacional - A |
|
Autoria: |
CUBBAGE, F.; MAC DONAGH, P.; SAWINSKI JÚNIOR, J.; RUBILAR, P. D.; DONOSO, P.; FERREIRA, A.; HOEFLICH, V. A.; OLMOS, V. M.; FERREIRA, G.; BALMELLI, G.; SIRY, J.; BÁEZ, M. N.; ALVAREZ, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
Frederick Cubbage, North Carolina State University; Patricio Mac Donagh, Universidad Nacional de Misiones; José Sawinski Júnior, Universidade do Contestado; Rafael Rubilar, Universidad de Concepción; Pablo Donoso, Universidad Austral de Chile; Arnaldo Ferreira, Forest Genetic; Vitor Hoeflich, Embrapa Florestas; Virginia Morales Olmos, University of Georgia; Gustavo Ferreira, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria; Gustavo Balmelli, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria; Jacek Siry, University of Georgia; Mirta Noemi Báez, Universidad Nacional de Misiones; José Alvarez, CMPC Forestry. |
|
Título: |
Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and Southern United States. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
News Forests, v. 33, p. 237-255, 2007. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Timber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns. Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only holding the land. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
América Latina; Financial analyses; Native forests; Plantação florestal. |
|
Thesagro: |
Análise Econômica; Floresta Nativa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
forest plantations; Latin America. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02340naa a2200361 a 4500
001 1313456
005 2015-02-25
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.
245 $aTimber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and Southern United States.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2007
520 $aTimber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns. Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only holding the land.
650 $aforest plantations
650 $aLatin America
650 $aAnálise Econômica
650 $aFloresta Nativa
653 $aAmérica Latina
653 $aFinancial analyses
653 $aNative forests
653 $aPlantação florestal
700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P.
700 1 $aSAWINSKI JÚNIOR, J.
700 1 $aRUBILAR, P. D.
700 1 $aDONOSO, P.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, A.
700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V. A.
700 1 $aOLMOS, V. M.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, G.
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aSIRY, J.
700 1 $aBÁEZ, M. N.
700 1 $aALVAREZ, J.
773 $tNews Forests$gv. 33, p. 237-255, 2007.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
