|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
Data corrente: |
25/01/2010 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/04/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
CAMPECHE, D. F. B.; PEREIRA, L. A.; FIGUEIREDO, R. A. C. R.; PAULINO, R. V.; ALVES, M. A.; NOVA, L. L. M. V.; GUEDES, E. A. C. |
Afiliação: |
DANIELA FERRAZ BACCONI CAMPECHE, CPATSA; LUCIO ALBERTO PEREIRA, CPATSA; R. A. C. R. FIGUEIREDO; R. V. PAULINO; M. A. ALVES; L. L. M. V. NOVA; E. A. C. GUEDES. |
Título: |
Limnological parameters and phytoplakton in fishponds with tambaqui, Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1816) in the semi-arid region. |
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, Rio Claro, v. 21, n. 3, p. 333-341, 2009. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
It was evaluated the limnological parameters in rain fed ponds. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Parametros limnológicos. |
Thesagro: |
Açude; Peixe; Viveiro. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Fish. |
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/17297/1/Daniela.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00822naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1630982 005 2017-04-12 008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCAMPECHE, D. F. B. 245 $aLimnological parameters and phytoplakton in fishponds with tambaqui, Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1816) in the semi-arid region. 260 $c2009 520 $aIt was evaluated the limnological parameters in rain fed ponds. 650 $aFish 650 $aAçude 650 $aPeixe 650 $aViveiro 653 $aParametros limnológicos 700 1 $aPEREIRA, L. A. 700 1 $aFIGUEIREDO, R. A. C. R. 700 1 $aPAULINO, R. V. 700 1 $aALVES, M. A. 700 1 $aNOVA, L. L. M. V. 700 1 $aGUEDES, E. A. C. 773 $tActa Limnologica Brasiliensia, Rio Claro$gv. 21, n. 3, p. 333-341, 2009.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
18/01/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
18/01/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
Autoria: |
GLÓRIA, L. S.; CRUZ, C. D.; VIEIRA, R. A. M.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; LOPES, P. S.; SIQUEIRA, O. H. G. B. D. de; SILVA, F. F. e. |
Afiliação: |
Leonardo Siqueira Glória, UFV; Cosme Damião Cruz, UFV; Ricardo Augusto Mendonça Vieira, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; Paulo Sávio Lopes, UFV; Otávio H. G. B. Dias de Siqueira, UFV; Fabyano Fonseca e Silva, UFV. |
Título: |
Accessing marker effects and heritability estimates from genome prediction by Bayesian regularized neural networks. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Livestock Science, v. 191, p. 91-96, Sept. 2016. |
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.015 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Recently, there is an increasing interest on semi- and non-parametric methods for genome-enabled prediction, among which the Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks (BRANN) stand. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of BRANN and to exploit SNP effects and heritability estimates using two different approaches (relative importance-RI, and relative contribution-RC). Additionally, we aimed also to compare BRANN with the traditional RR-BLUP and BLASSO by using simulated datasets. The simplest BRANN (net1), RR-BLUP and BLASSO methods outperformed other more parameterized BRANN (net2, net3, ? net6) in terms of predictive ability. For both simulated traits (Y1 and Y2) the net1 provided the best h2 estimates (0.33 for both, being the true h2=0.35), whereas RR-BLUP (0.18 and 0.22 for Y1 and Y2, respectively) and BLASSO (0.20 and 0.26 for Y1 and Y2, respectively) underestimated h2. The marker effects estimated from net1 (using RI and RC approaches) and RR-BLUP were similar, but the shrinkage strength was remarkable for BLASSO on both traits. For Y1, the correlation between the true fifty QTL effects and the effects estimated for the SNPs located in the same QTL positions were 0.61, 0.60, 0.60 and 0.55, for RI, RC, RR-BLUP and BLASSO; and for Y2, these correlations were 0.81, 0.81, 0.81 and 0.71, respectively. In summary, we believe that estimates of SNP effects are promising quantitative tools to bring discussions on chromosome regions contributing most effectively to the phenotype expression when using ANN for genomic predictions. MenosRecently, there is an increasing interest on semi- and non-parametric methods for genome-enabled prediction, among which the Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks (BRANN) stand. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of BRANN and to exploit SNP effects and heritability estimates using two different approaches (relative importance-RI, and relative contribution-RC). Additionally, we aimed also to compare BRANN with the traditional RR-BLUP and BLASSO by using simulated datasets. The simplest BRANN (net1), RR-BLUP and BLASSO methods outperformed other more parameterized BRANN (net2, net3, ? net6) in terms of predictive ability. For both simulated traits (Y1 and Y2) the net1 provided the best h2 estimates (0.33 for both, being the true h2=0.35), whereas RR-BLUP (0.18 and 0.22 for Y1 and Y2, respectively) and BLASSO (0.20 and 0.26 for Y1 and Y2, respectively) underestimated h2. The marker effects estimated from net1 (using RI and RC approaches) and RR-BLUP were similar, but the shrinkage strength was remarkable for BLASSO on both traits. For Y1, the correlation between the true fifty QTL effects and the effects estimated for the SNPs located in the same QTL positions were 0.61, 0.60, 0.60 and 0.55, for RI, RC, RR-BLUP and BLASSO; and for Y2, these correlations were 0.81, 0.81, 0.81 and 0.71, respectively. In summary, we believe that estimates of SNP effects are promising quantitative tools to bring discussions on chromosome regions contributing most effectively ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Genetic parameters; QTL; Redes neurais. |
Thesagro: |
Parâmetro Genético. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Marker-assisted selection; Neural networks. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
Marc: |
LEADER 02443naa a2200277 a 4500 001 2061138 005 2017-01-18 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.015$2DOI 100 1 $aGLÓRIA, L. S. 245 $aAccessing marker effects and heritability estimates from genome prediction by Bayesian regularized neural networks.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aRecently, there is an increasing interest on semi- and non-parametric methods for genome-enabled prediction, among which the Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks (BRANN) stand. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of BRANN and to exploit SNP effects and heritability estimates using two different approaches (relative importance-RI, and relative contribution-RC). Additionally, we aimed also to compare BRANN with the traditional RR-BLUP and BLASSO by using simulated datasets. The simplest BRANN (net1), RR-BLUP and BLASSO methods outperformed other more parameterized BRANN (net2, net3, ? net6) in terms of predictive ability. For both simulated traits (Y1 and Y2) the net1 provided the best h2 estimates (0.33 for both, being the true h2=0.35), whereas RR-BLUP (0.18 and 0.22 for Y1 and Y2, respectively) and BLASSO (0.20 and 0.26 for Y1 and Y2, respectively) underestimated h2. The marker effects estimated from net1 (using RI and RC approaches) and RR-BLUP were similar, but the shrinkage strength was remarkable for BLASSO on both traits. For Y1, the correlation between the true fifty QTL effects and the effects estimated for the SNPs located in the same QTL positions were 0.61, 0.60, 0.60 and 0.55, for RI, RC, RR-BLUP and BLASSO; and for Y2, these correlations were 0.81, 0.81, 0.81 and 0.71, respectively. In summary, we believe that estimates of SNP effects are promising quantitative tools to bring discussions on chromosome regions contributing most effectively to the phenotype expression when using ANN for genomic predictions. 650 $aMarker-assisted selection 650 $aNeural networks 650 $aParâmetro Genético 653 $aGenetic parameters 653 $aQTL 653 $aRedes neurais 700 1 $aCRUZ, C. D. 700 1 $aVIEIRA, R. A. M. 700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de 700 1 $aLOPES, P. S. 700 1 $aSIQUEIRA, O. H. G. B. D. de 700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. e 773 $tLivestock Science$gv. 191, p. 91-96, Sept. 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|